HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-07-17 Min - Board REGULAR MEETING
. July 17, 1989
The regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District was called to order at 7 : 05 P.M. by
President Maass in the TDPUD Board Room.
ROLL CALL: Directors Aguera, Corbett, Sutton, White and Maass were
present.
EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Debi Black, Mary Chapman, Sue Felce, Peter
Holzmeister, Andy Hyde and Susan Craig.
CONSULTANTS PRESENT: Counsel John Phelps.
OTHERS PRESENT: Among those present in the audience were Ron and
Virginia Legg, Charlie White, Bob and Christina Mortensen, Tony and
Mary Rivara, John Minnis, Terry Garcia, Mr. and Mrs. Greg Lamb,
Mike Garcia, Gary Tompkins, Lorraine Curtis and Mr. Blakely.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Counsel Phelps suggested changes to the draft minutes of June 5,
1989 . Thereafter, Director White moved, and Director Corbett
seconded, that the Secretary be directed to prepare the minutes of
June 5 in final form as corrected. All Directors, aye, by voice
vote. SO MOVED.
Director White moved that the Secretary be directed to prepare the
minutes of June 19, 1989 in final form as written; seconded by
Director Corbett. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND AND BILLS FOR APPROVAL
Director White noted that two items, the bills from Big D
International and from Dinter Engineering, are listed as specific
agenda items and should not have been included with the other bills
on the list for consideration.
After several questions were answered, Director Corbett moved that
the bills be approved with the exclusion of the Big D and Dinter
bills, which will be considered later in the meeting; seconded by
Director White. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
MANAGERIS REPORT - POSSIBLE DIRECTION
Water quality report
Manager Holzmeister reported that the District has experienced no
bacterial problems through the month of June. In addition to the
routine coliform testing, the State Department of Health Services
took the first quarter sample from the new Hirschdale Well in May.
® The results were negative, no organics were detected in the water.
Discussion of billing error
1
An error in the bills sent to 24 commercial accounts during the
past year was recently discovered. Large power customers were
underbilled in the amount of $183,481.52 . The problem occurred
last July when the demand charge in the rate file was changed on
the computer from $10. 61 per kilowatt of demand to $ . 61 per
kilowatt of demand on readings over the minimum demand.
Staff has not been able to determine exactly how the error
occurred, but has concluded it happened sometime between July 13
and July 27, 1988. Since the discovery, the file has been secured
and several monthly procedures have been implemented to prevent an
error like this from going undetected.
Counsel Phelps noted that the affected customers, in his opinion,
have a legal obligation to pay as long as the District can
establish that $10. 61 per kilowatt of demand on readings over the
minimum demand is the correct rate.
The Office Supervisor has prepared a letter of apology to each of
the customers which she will send along with a bill for the amount
due. An optional payment schedule has been arranged for the
customers' convenience.
Financial statements
Mr. Holzmeister advised that financial statements for the District
through the month of May 1989 were provided in the Board meeting
packets.
Soil contamination clean-up
The Manager noted that he has received a proposal from SEA to help
resolve the soil contamination clean-up at a cost of $27, 285. He
suggested staying with SEA through the submission of the plan to
Lahontan for their approval, then securing a proposal from
HydroSearch to see if the work can be done at a lessor expense.
Director Sutton said that what the Board authorized last December
was a letter to Lahontan saying the District would monitor the
situation but wouldn't assume any liability for any alleged
contamination. Regarding other proposals to see if the work can
be done at a lessor expense, she said she didn't think it would be
fair to only approach HydroSearch; that Roy Hampson and perhaps
Terry Lowell should be contacted as well.
Director Maass questioned whether the District would be liable for
contamination clean-up since the State of California, Department
of Agriculture owned the land originally and installed the tank.
It was mentioned that there was previously a gas station where Fire
House #2 is now (across the street at the east end of the District
complex) , and that the tanks were not properly abandoned. Director
Sutton suggested that the District do nothing until Lahontan
provides a response to the District' s February 7 , 1989 letter
wherein it was stated that the PUD believes it has corrected the
2
problem that occurred on its property and mentions that other
® properties could now be the source of contamination.
After some discussion, the Board, by consensus, directed the
Manager to request written response from the Water Quality Control
Board, Lahontan Region, concerning the District' s advice of
February 7, 1989 that other sources may be responsible for the
alleged contamination.
PUBLIC HEARING - HIRSCHDALE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - DISCUSSION
OF COST ALLOCATION AMONG BENEFITTING PROPERTIES AND POSSIBLE
DIRECTION - REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR SERVICE FORM -
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISTRICT TO FILE LIENS WITH COUNTY OF
NEVADA - CONSIDERATION OF COOK ASSOCIATES' BILLING
The Chairman advised that the residents of Hirschdale each received
a detailed packet presenting the water system project history and
the allocation options. A copy of that material has been attached
to these minutes for reference.
Civil Engineer Hyde explained that, traditionally, benefitting
property owners pay for the public facility improvements that
benefit their properties. The legal basis for assessing costs to
benefitting properties is found in the Improvement Act of 1911 and
the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 . He said the PUD is
proposing to assess the project costs in excess of the grant, a
total of $92 , 519 . 97, to benefitting properties. The parcels to be
included in the assessment are shown on Exhibit 2 of the attached
material. Two different methods are presented on Exhibits 3 and
4 .
The standard District formula of allocating costs is shown in
Exhibit 3 . This method divides the total project cost into two
portions, domestic use and fire protection. The cost of the
facilities that serve domestic needs is 1/3 of the total cost and
the remainder of the cost, 2/3 of the whole, is the cost associated
with fire protection. The domestic costs are allocated to each
parcel on the basis of front footage to the water mains installed
adjacent to each parcel. The fire protection costs are allocated
to each parcel on the basis of area of each parcel. In either
case, the total frontage or acreage of all the parcels is
calculated and percentage of cost paid by each parcel is equal to
the percentage of frontage or acreage that each parcel bears on the
total. The total assessment for each parcel is the sum of the
domestic and fire protection costs.
The dwelling unit/zoning method of allocating costs is shown in
Exhibit 4. This method allocates costs based upon the number of
dwelling units that could be constructed upon each parcel according
to the zoning established by Nevada County. Most parcels in
Hirschdale are zoned FR-40, Forest and Recreation, one dwelling per
40 acres, which means that all existing parcels zoned FR-40 can
support a maximum of one unit. A few parcels in Hirschdale are
zoned R2 - 15, 500. This zoning allows one dwelling unit per 15, 500
square feet of gross area.
3
® Mr. Hyde summarized the construction costs and amount to be
assessed and went over the map of the Hirschdale area as defined
by the County Assessor.
President Maass opened the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. He noted
the District received written comment from R. H. Fehrt, owner of
AP#48-120-16, stating that he would prefer the District allocate
costs per the standard formula as shown on Exhibit 3 .
Greg Lamb, AP#48-110-13, said he would like the allocation to be
made per dwelling unit/zoning. He also advised that his lot cannot
. He said it
be divided into four lots according
to the County.
should have been re-zoned to R-1 at the time he purchased it.
Mike Garcia, AP#48-110-10, said he prefers the cost allocation
shown in Exhibit 4 . He said he would be in favor of all residents
paying an equal amount if there was agreement that only one
dwelling be built on each parcel. . . .Mr. Garcia stated he would be
willing to pay more for preserving the quality of the area and
limiting growth.
Mr. Blakely, AP#48-100-06, said he prefers the allocation shown on
Exhibit 4 . Lorraine Curtis, AP#48-110-03 , stated she is in favor
of the allocation set forth on Exhibit 3 . Bruce Waltrip, AP#48-
100-07, spoke with Mr. Hyde earlier and advised he is in favor of
. Exhibit 4 .
John Minnis, AP#48-120-17, said he is very disappointed in how the
District is handling the $92, 000 cost over-run and thought the
project could have been managed much more efficiently. He stated
he is in favor of all residents paying an equal allocation.
Gary Thompkins, AP#48-100-03 , said he agrees with Mr. Minnis. He
said he feels the District mismanaged the project which resulted
in cost over-runs. Mr. Thompkins works for a well driller and said
he thinks some money could have been saved if the project was
handled differently. He was in favor of Exhibit 4 and also said
if Mr. Rivara and Mr. Lamb only built one dwelling on each of their
lots he would be willing to pay extra.
Mr. Lamb said he is planning to build a single family home on his
parcel and would be willing to sign an affidavit to that effect
which could be recorded.
Mr. Rivara advised that there is a zone change pending on AP#48-
110-11; it will be divided into two lots. He said he would also
be willing to sign an affidavit stating there would be only one
service for each parcel.
A strong majority of Hirschdale residents present then indicated
that they would accept equal assessments of approximately $2 , 151
® if Mr. Lamb and Mr. Rivara would restrict development of their lots
as they had offered to do.
4
I!
® The public hearing was closed at 8:47 P.M.
Director Maass moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the Board
approve the Hirschdale water system cost allocation per dwelling
unit/zoning. Total cost is $92, 519.97 ; cost for each DUE is
$2 , 151. 62 . With respect to Lots 11, 39 and 40, the Lambs and
Rivaras are to sign agreements that they will execute a legal
covenant to be recorded with Nevada County indicating there will
be only one water service for Lot 40 and two each for Lots 11 and
39, and indicating their intent to have the parcels rezoned.
Exhibit 4 is to be redone showing the proper allocations to each
property owner. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
Director Maass moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that an
appropriate resolution be prepared for Board consideration at the
August 7 meeting showing the correct cost allocation, interest and
payment schedule for each property owner for the Hirschdale water
system. Formation of a district for the purpose of placing
assessments on the parcels for collection by the County is to be
pursued. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
The Board reviewed the proposed supplemental application form for
service. Thereafter, Director White moved, and Director Corbett
seconded, that the Board approve the Hirschdale supplemental
application form with the following amendments: the addition of a
disclaimer in Section 4 (a) , notation that the District is to
inspect all connections to the new system. All Directors, aye, by
voice vote. SO MOVED.
Mr. Hyde noted he has reviewed the Cook Associates ' most recent
billing and, as far as he can tell, it is essentially correct. The
billings can be summarized as follows: basic services, $45, 178. 82 ;
inspection, $25, 879.73 ; audit preparation, $4, 310. He said that
Cook's earlier billing was $10, 026. 62 higher.
After some discussion, Director Maass moved that the Board approve
payment to Cook Associates in the amount of $26,431. 29 (the amount
owed less the $4, 310 charge for audit preparation) ;seconded by
Director Corbett. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO MOVED. The
Manager was directed to ask Mr. Cook to justify this billing for
non-engineering service.
The Board will consider the resolution authorizing the District to
file liens with the County of Nevada at the next regular meeting.
DONNER LAKE UTILITY COMPANY ACQUISITION - REVIEW OF PROCESS -
AUTHORIZATION TO SEND LETTER AND QUESTIONNAIRE
Manager Holzmeister advised that the Water Committee discussed the
possible acquisition of Donner Lake Utility Company on June 30,
1989. It was the committee' s concern that the PUD make sure the
• property owners and residents of Donner Lake know the full impact
of the PUD's acquiring the system and that they support such
action. To that end the committee developed a process for
5
consideration by the Board. Also provided for review was a draft
® letter and questionnaire which would be sent to all Donner Lake
property owners and residents.
Several suggestions were made to amend the list of procedures to
be followed and, thereafter, Director Corbett moved that the Board
approve the list of tasks; seconded by Director White. All
Directors, aye, by voice vote.
Susan Craig, property owner at Donner Lake, noted that she has
received excellent service from Donner Lake Utility and indicated
she would not be receptive to paying assessments in order for the
TDPUD to acquire and improve the system. Ms. Craig suggested that
affected property owners be advised, prior to the questionnaire
being sent, if the present owner is being required by the State to
make improvements to the system for which the customers will be
assessed. If this is the case, she said, her opinion may change
since the PUD has the ability to apply for grants and low interest
loans which may make the cost to the property owner less than if
a private company does the improvements. The Manager stated that
Mr. Williams, owner of DLUC, has not advised of any such
requirements. Charlie White, Donner Lake resident, said he would
be educating the affected owners via the Property Owners '
newsletter.
The draft letter and questionnaire were reviewed and discussed.
. Several changes were decided upon. Director Sutton suggested that
an ad be placed in the Sierra Sun advising the customers that
Donner Lake Utility has approached the PUD and offered to sell the
company and advising of the questionnaire that will be sent. The
Board agreed with mailing the letter and with Director Sutton' s
suggestion. (A copy of the amended list, letter and questionnaire
has been attached to these minutes for reference and is to be
provided to each Director. )
RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING AND FIXING ELECTRIC AND WATER STANDBY
CHARGES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO 7501 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
Director Aguera moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the
Board adopt Resolution No. 8917 implementing and fixing electric
and water standby charges pursuant to Ordinance No. 7501 for the
fiscal year 1989-90. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO RESOLVED.
RESOLUTION FIXING AND PLACING ELECTRIC AND WATER STANDBY CHARGES
ON DISTRICT TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION BY THE COUNTIES OF PLACER AND
NEVADA
Director Aguera moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the
Board adopt Resolution No. 8918 fixing and placing electric and
water standby charges on District tax roll for collection by the
Counties of Placer and Nevada. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye.
SO RESOLVED.
• CONSIDERATION OF RECLOSER BIDS AND POSSIBLE AWARD
6
In his memo, Mr. Buckhouse noted that only one bid was received for
providing two reclosers for use in the Truckee Substation. The
price is within the budgeted amount, and Mr. Buckhouse recommended
the bid be awarded to Cooper Power Systems in the amount of
$26, 192 .
Director Corbett moved, and Director White seconded, that the
recloser bid be awarded to Cooper Power Systems for $26, 192 . All
Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CALL FOR BIDS FOR GARAGE HEATERS
Mr. Holzmeister noted that there has been a problem with ice
building up in the garages the past two winters. The proposed
heaters will solve the problem and make a safer work place for the
employees. Dinter Engineering prepared plans and specifications
for the installation; copies were provided to the Board.
Director Corbett moved that the Board approve payment of the Dinter
Engineering bill in the amount of $1,960; seconded by Director
White. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
Director Corbett moved, and Director White seconded, that the Board
adopt Resolution No. 8919 authorizing the call for bids for garage
heaters. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO RESOLVED.
• AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT AND PAY FOR DUMP TRUCK
The dump truck was delivered to the District yard on June 30, 1989 .
Civil Engineer Hyde inspected the truck and determined that it
complies with the specifications. He recommended accepting the
truck and authorizing payment.
Director Aguera moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the
Board approve payment of the Big D International bill in the amount
of $70,723 . 48 for the dump truck. All Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
CONSIDERATION OF NEVADA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S
REQUEST TO USE WEST PARKING AREA FOR COLLECTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
The County Department of Transportation requested use of the
District's west parking area for collection of hazardous waste on
Saturday, August 26, 1989. The County has named the District as
an additional insured and provided a certificate of coverage.
Director White moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the Board
approve Nevada County's request to use the west parking area for
collection of hazardous waste on August 26, 1989 . All Directors,
aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
PUBLIC INPUT
• There was no public input.
CORRESPONDENCE
7
John Corbett's letter re East South River Street water line
The Chairman acknowledged receipt of the letter from Director
Corbett this date advising that he is assisting Grace Robertson in
locating the underground pipes in her trailer park.
Director Maass noted a possible conflict on the part of Director
Corbett, and Director Corbett assured him he is helping Mrs.
Robertson as an individual, not in his capacity as a Board member.
There was some discussion, and Director Sutton moved that Director
Corbett be directed to report any developments to the Manager who,
in turn, is to report to the Board; seconded by Director White.
All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Holzmeister reported that the Water Committee met on June 29,
1989 and discussed Donner Lake Utility Company and Hirschdale.
Both items were covered earlier in the meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
The Board adjourned to closed session at 10:50 P.M. for the purpose
of discussing personnel matters.
. RETURN TO PUBLIC SESSION
The meeting was returned to public session at 11: 28 P.M. No
direction was given or action taken as a result of closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, Director Aguera
moved that the meeting be adjourned at 11:29 P.M. ; seconded by
Director Corbett. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
J es A. Maass, Pr sident
Prepared by w ._
Susan M. Craig, Deputy District Cle
smc
•
8