HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-07-16 Min - Board , .. REGULAR MEETING
July 16, 2008
In accordance with District Code Section 2.08.010, the TDPUD minutes are action
only minutes. All Board meetings are recorded on audio tapes which are preserved
perpetually and made available for listening to any interested party upon their
request.
The regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District
was called to order at 6:00 in the TDPUD Board room by Vice President Thomason.
ROLL CALL: Directors Joe Aguera, Ron Hemig, and Bill Thomason were present.
Directors Patricia Sutton and Tim Taylor were absent.
EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Mary Chapman, Nancy Waters, Kathy Neus, Steve Hollabaugh,
Steve Poncelet, Neil Kaufman, Bob Mescher, Rosana Matlock, Steve Murphy, Michael
Holley and Barbara Cahill
CONSULTANTS PRESENT: Steve Gross
OTHERS PRESENT: Juanita Schneider and Helen Davis
CHANGES IN THE AGENDA
There were no changes to the agenda.
PUBLIC INPUT
There was no public input.
DIRECTOR UPDATE
There were no Director updates.
PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing was delayed until the scheduled time of 6:15 PM.
CONSENT CALENDAR
AUTHORIZATION TO RENEW INSURANCE BROKERAGE CONTRACT WITH MARSH
RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES This item concerns renewing the District's insur-
ance brokerage contract with Marsh Risk and Insurance Services for the 2008-2009
insurance year.
2008-09 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE RENEWAL This item concerns
renewal of the State Compensation Insurance Fund policy for 2008-2009.
Director Aguera moved, and Director Hemig seconded, that the Board approve the con-
sent calendar.
ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors aye, by voice vote.
SO MOVED
1 Minutes: July 16, 2008
ACTION ITEMS
CONSIDERATION OF REAFFIRMING THE OFFICE OF TREASURER, DEFINING THE
TREASURER'S DUTIES, CREATING THE OFFICE OF ASSISTANT TREASURER AND
APPOINTING INDIVIDUALS TO THE OFFICES This item concerns the reaffirming of
the office of the Treasurer, defining the Treasurer's duties, creating the office of
Assistant Treasurer and appointing individuals to the offices.
Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera seconded, that the Board adopt the resolu-
tions reaffirming the office of District Treasurer, defining the Treasurer's duties and creat-
ing the office of Assistant Treasurer to act in the absence of the Treasurer; and appointing
individuals to the offices of Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer. ROLL CALL: Directors Sut-
ton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED
CONSIDERATION OF CREATING THE OFFICE OF ACCOUNTANT, DEFINING THE
DUTIES OF THE OFFICE AND THE APPOINTING AN INDIVIDUAL TO THE OFFICE
This item concerns the creation of the office of Accountant per the Public Utilities
Code and the appointment of an individual to that Office.
Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera seconded, that the Board adopt the resolu-
tions creating the office of Accountant and defining the duties of the office; and appointing
an individual to the office of Accountant. ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent;
All other Directors aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED
TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUND LEASE WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PA-
TROL. Telecommunications Ground Lease with the California Highway Patrol
Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera seconded, that the Board authorize the Gen-
eral Manager to sign the one-year lease extension with the State of California, Department
of General Services Real Estate Services Division covering premises located at Ski Tow
Hill (Ponderosa Palisades Tank Site). ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All
other Directors aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED
PUBLIC HEARING
CEQA INITIAL STUDY FOR STOCKHOLM PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT
Vice President Thomason opened the public hearing. There was no public comment. The
hearing was closed.
AUTHORIZING NEW CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRE-
SENTATIVE This item concerns a staffing position in the Conservation Department.
Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera seconded, that the Board approve the job de-
scription for a Conservation Department Customer Service Representative; and approve
- the new position of Conservation Department Customer Service Representative at the sal-
ary range #8. ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors aye, by
voice vote. SO MOVED
2 Minutes: July 16, 2008
WORKSHOPS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING METERING OF RESIDENTIAL WATER
SERVICES This item is a presentation and discussion of residential metering.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
Neil Kaufman and Bob Mescher gave a presentation:
• Workshops held on April 16, June 18 and July 2
• Additional Information Requested at July 2 Workshop
o Are there any savings from decreased water consumption and well production?
o How will incurring additional debt affect the District's debt coverage ratios?
• New information
o Industry studies typically cite reduction in water consumption of 10% - 20% with
implementation of metering
o It is assumed that a 10% reduction can be achieved through metering and other
water conservation programs
• Assumptions: number of customers will increase 1% annually and electric costs in-
crease at 3.5% due to inflation
• Four cases considered as to impact on conservation
o Base Case: no impact from metering or conservation
o Delayed Implementation: 4% reduction in water production by 2010 with 6% by
2022, 8% by 2023 and 10% by 2024
o Gradual Implementation: 4% reduction in water production by 2010, increasing
by 0.4% annually with 10% reduction by 2025
o Expedited Implementation: 4% reduction in water production by 2010, increasing
by 2% annually with 10% reduction by 2013
Case Total Savings over 17-Year Period
Base Case $0 0 gallons
Delayed Implementation $2.2 million 2.2 billion gals
Gradual Implementation $3.0 million 3.0 billion gals
Expedited Implementation 1$3.8 million 4.0 billion gals
• Debt Coverage Ratios
o FY 2008 budget debt service is $1,963,096
o This amount is 21% of Water General Fund revenue
o Expedited Implementation calls for $9.6 million, 15-year loan with annual debt
service of about $941,000
o At 5.46% interest, the debt service payment is $6.33 per customer per month
o If surcharge is $5.88, as proposed, debt service coverage will be impacted by
about 0.7%
o Sensitivity Analysis of Monthly Surcharge (Expedited):
$ 7 for 10.5 years = $6 million, 10 year loan
■ $ 8 for 8.5 years = $5 million, 10 year loan
■ $ 9 for 7.5 years = $4 million, 10 year loan
■ $10 for 7.0 years = $3 million, 10 year loan
• $11 for 6.0 years = $3 million, 5 year loan
3 Minutes: July 16, 2008
■ $12 for 5.5 years = $1 million, 5 year loan
■ $13 for 5.0 years = no long-term debt
• Next steps
o Board direction regarding implementation timing
o Water Department action plan for approval at Special Board Meeting on July 23
o Public outreach plan
Public input:
• Who pays for the meters- or does the surcharge to the customers cover the meters?
• There would only be the surcharge increase to customers- not the additional cost of
a meter.
• What about a metered rate structure?
• Why try to expedite to 2013?
• Want reassurance that the surcharge takes care of everything.
• Not all for conservation, not for expedited and not in a rush to be charged $13-
could swallow $5.88
• 1 do not want to be charged $13- that would push my monthly water bill close to
$100- be more prudent and lower the surcharge
• OK with the $5.88 surcharge, 15 year loan with project complete by 2013- expedited
Board Discussion:
• Good example showing expedited, surcharge in relation to length of loan
• Wanted delayed so can pay as we go- even in the gradual case, the customer sur-
charge was around $5
• Any plan will use a surcharge- it is up to the Board what to charge the ratepayer
• Would like to see system go in place as expedited- want done by 2013
• Let's get this done- expedite- does not make sense to do in 15 years
• Do quicker to fulfill conservation- new system can give customers additional infor-
mation so they can conserve
• There is an impact on the community when some people are metered and some are
not
• Impact on staff as dual billing systems
• Cannot find reason to move quickly
• Electric and water savings are possible- with savings of water used, may not have
to drill another well
• Bond is ok if the benefit is long term
• Match customer payment with the benefit they receive
• Not in favor of a $10 million note- want a "pay as you go"
• Understand the concern with expedited implementation
• Draw down the loan with a higher surcharge
• Hard to hit the new General Manager with a big debt
• If stretch out implementation, technology may get better in the future
• More conservation on the expedited plan- want all on the system- don't stretch out
to 2023
• "Pay as you go": by reducing the surcharge $1.00, one year is added on to
completion
• A $13 surcharge is too high for customers all at once- $5.50 to $60 would be better
4 Minutes: July 16, 2008
It is not equal between different scenarios- $6 would be enough for a customer
increase.
• Bond does not bother me.
The Board advised staff to draft a Water Metering ;Implementation plan to include Phase 1
(Pilot Program), Phase 2(AB2572 compliance by 2010) and expedited implementation plan
(AB2572 compliance by 2025) to come before the Board for review at the July 23, 2008
special meeting. Public will continue to have an opportunity for input.
REVIEW OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 5 CUSTOMER RELATIONS OF
THE DISTRICT CODE This item concerns the proposed amendments to Title 5 Cus-
tomer Relations of the District Code
Mary Chapman gave highlights of the major changes to Title 5, Customer Relations:
• Clarified deposit requirements
• Changed deposit retention period back to 2 years
• Increased minimum construction related deposits
• Clarified language for re-establishing and maintaining credit
• Added payment options previously approved by the Board
• Clarified when charges would begin, continue or stop for un-metered water
accounts
• Modified the late payment notice and dispute resolution procedure to comply with
current California Public Utilities Code
• Deleted sections where the District would finance construction and energy efficiency
projects
• Removed reference to Public Information Committee
• Added section regarding Public Information and Conservation Manager
• Removed details of Conservation Rebate Program;
• Revised the customer complaint procedure
• Increase payback amount to customers that can be routinely handled by
department heads
Public input:
• Agree with the updating- easier to read the new revised document and refer back to
the red-lined version for the changes.
Board discussion
• Would like another workshop in two weeks
• Director Taylor needs the opportunity to discuss
• Want to discuss further and vote on August 6
• Makes for a usable policy
• Is there a reason for the back and forth on the deposit times (12 to 24 months)?
5 Minutes: July 16, 2008
SEMI-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICT'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE THROUGH
JUNE, 2008 This items concerns providing the Board of Directors with a review of
the financial activity and performance of the District's operations through
June, 2008.
Bob Mescher presented the charts in connection with the semi-annual financial review:
• Electric Operating Revenue- includes residential, commercial, interdepartmental
o YTD actual $10,256,101
0 12 Mo. Budget $22,770,643
0 45% of budget
• Water Operating Revenue- includes residential, commercial, interdepartmental
o YTD actual $4,358,116
0 12 Mo. Budget $9,736,422
0 44.8% of budget
• Electric Operating Expenditures
o YTD Actual $8,932,865
0 12 Mo. Budget $18,101,271
0 49.3% of budget
• Water Operating Expenditures
o YTD Actual $2,819,555
0 12 Mo. Budget $6,314,406
0 44.7% of budget
• Capital Expenditures
o YTD Actual $2,049,174
0 12 Mo. Budget $10,781,011
0 19% of budget
The Board suggested that staff return with options to bring the budget back in alignment.
ROUTINE BUSINESS
TREASURER'S REPORT: JUNE, 2008
Approval of the treasurer's report: Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera sec-
onded, that the Board approve the month ended June 30, 2008.
ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
Approval of disbursements: Director Hemig moved, and Director Aguera seconded, that
the Board approve the June 2008 disbursements report.
ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR: JUNE 18
AND J U LY 29 2008
Director Thomason moved, and Director Hemig seconded, that the Board approve the min-
utes of June 18 and July 2, 2008 as amended.
ROLL CALL: Directors Sutton and Taylor, absent; All other Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
6 Minutes: July 16, 2008
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO SECTION
54956.8 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. PROPERTY: 14629 GLENSHIRE DRIVE APN
49-011-29 AND 14630 GLENSHIRE DRIVE, 49-011-31; DISTRICT NEGOTIATOR: GEN-
ERAL MANAGER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KAPPY MANN," COLDWELL BANKER
REAL ESTATE; UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO SECTION
54956.8 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. PROPERTY: SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COM-
PANY, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY; DISTRICT NEGOTIATOR: GENERAL MANAGER;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY; UNDER NEGOTIA-
TION: PRICE AND TERMS.
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
The reportable action for the item concerning the Glenshire Property is as follows: "By
unanimous roll call vote of the Directors present, the Board approved an agreement to sell
the Glenshire Property, 14629 and 14630 Glenshire Drive, Nevada County APN's 49-011-
29 and 49-011031, respectively, to the Tahoe Forest Church with a 60 day contingency
period."
There was no reportable action for the item concerning the Sierra Pacific Power Company
property.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:57 PM.
to n1�J
TRUCKgE [ f j,lsl�BLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
411liam Thomason, Vice-President
Prepared b Cvt�W(y
r y �
Barbara Cahiy., Deputy District Clerk
7 Minutes: July 16, 2008