HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-04-07 Min - Board REGULAR MEETING
April 7, 1986
The regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public
Utility District was called to order by President Maass at 7:02 P.M. in the
TDPUD Board room.
ROLL CALL: Directors Cooley, Corbett , Hamilton, Sutton and Maass were
present.
EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Mary Chapman, Ron Reynolds , Tom Buckhouse , Peter
Holzmeister and Susan Craig.
CONSULTANTS PRESENT: Counsel John M. Phelps.
OTHERS PRESENT: Among those present in the audience were Dick
VanLandingham, Mr. and Mrs. Karl Kuttel, Steve Pike , Eric Monson, Carol
Armstrong, Rob Collins and Sean Moore.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Director Sutton moved, and Director Hamilton seconded , that the minutes of
March 3. 1986 be approved as written. All Directors, aye, by voice vote.
SO MOVED.
At the last regular meeting, Director Sutton asked that consideration of
the February 18 , 1986 minutes be put over in order for her to check the
accuracy of certain discussion relating to bid limits required by law
reported in the draft minutes. She advised that she listened to the tape
of that meeting and is satisfied that the minutes properly reflect the
discussion.
Director Sutton reminded the Board of an amendment to the draft of the
February 18th minutes made previously. The minutes are to show Board
consensus that the Manager pursue discussion with Sierra Pacific Power
Company with respect to wheeling (Page 5, paragraph 2).
Director Cooley moved, and Director Sutton seconded, that the Secretary be
directed to prepare the minutes of February 18 , 1986 in final form as
corrected. All Directors, aye , by voice vote. SO MOVED,
STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND AND BILLS FOR APPROVAL
With respect to the Simon, Porter, Graham and Phelps bill, Director Sutton
stated she does not think certain research for which the District is being
charged was authorized by the Board - 1) discussions with the PUC relating
to Sierra Pacific's franchise area and 2) preparation of an opinion on
prescriptive rights. She asked that the bill be excluded.
Director Cooley moved, and Director Corbett seconded , that the bills
presented for consideration be paid with the exception of the Simon/Porter
bill. All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
Responding to Director Cooley, Director Sutton explained that there are
-1-
A^ items on the current and previous Simon/Porter bill for time spent on
behalf of the District relating to inquiries made to the PUC which she
believes to be related to changing the franchise area of SPPCo. Counsel
Phelps stated this was done in connection with the annexation of Ponderosa
Hills. The District applied to Placer County LAFCo to serve both water and
electricity in the subject area. Placer County gave tentative approval
subject to the necessary PUC approval. Director Sutton asked if action to
pursue the application before the Public Utilities Commission was given in
public session, and Counsel Phelps stated he thought it was. Manager
Holzmeister reported that the matter was discussed in public session and
the Board agreed to complete the annexation of Ponderosa Hills which
included application to the PUC. Again, Director Sutton asked if this was
stated in the minutes. Counsel noted that the matter may have been
discussed in closed session because of the threat of litigation by Sierra
Pacific.
With respect to the opinion prepared by Counsel on prescriptive rights,
Director Sutton stated she thought the Board, by consensus, indicated it
didn't need an opinion. Counsel Phelps, referring to the draft minutes of
March 17th, reported that the Chairman directed him to provide a legal
opinion on prescriptive rights and that the matter (Kuttel request to
relocate power lines) be placed on the next agenda as a New Business item.
Director Sutton reminded Counsel that the minutes of March 17, 1986 are in
draft form and subject to correction.
Director Hamilton moved, and Director Corbett seconded , that the Porter,
Simon, Graham and Phelps bill be approved for payment. ROLL CALL: Sutton,
no; all other Directors, aye. SO MOVED,
MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr. Holzmeister noted he would report on specific agenda items rather than
at this time.
PUBLIC INPUT
There was no public input.
CORRESPONDENCE
Frederic Kohler of Hilltop
Correspondence was received from Mr. Kohler asking for permission to use
and improve the railroad grade from Hilltop to the flats above the river
for sleigh and hayrides; also, he requested the right to maintain and
improve the bridge over the water pipe. He indicated they would work in
cooperation with District staff to create a safe situation and would name
the PUD on their liability insurance.
Both Director Corbett and Manager Holzmeister expected that Mr. Kohler
would be in attendance to discuss this matter, however he was not present.
Discussion ensued regarding the apparent unauthorized use of this same PUD
property for a ski operation. It was noted that a bridge was constructed
-2-
over a District water pipe without District approval. Upon discovering the
bridge, the PUD Manager asked Ms. Thorwaldsen to have it removed. As yet
it still remains on the property.
At the start of winter, Rhondi Thorwaldsen asked permission of the PUD for
the Hilltop Ski School to locate a cross country trail over its property.
The Board indicated it would consider her request upon receiving a draft
agreement prepared at her expense which included provisions to adequately
insure the District. Such an agreement was never presented to the
District.
After some discussion, Director Hamilton moved that the Board authorize the
Manager to have the bridge removed, post the property for no trespassing,
and send a letter to all adjacent land owners advising them that the
District has not given permission to anyone for access or usage; seconded
by Director Sutton, All Directors, aye, with the exception of Director
Cooley, who abstained. SO MOVED.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Director Sutton asked that a committee meeting be scheduled to discuss a
policy regarding conference and seminar expenses. Director Hamilton asked
to be removed from the committee due to business commitments , and Director
Cooley volunteered to take his place.
,,.., Director Sutton stated she expects anyone to be able to attend this
meeting. A discussion ensued regarding attendance by the public at
committee meetings and related provisions of the Brown Act. Although no
date was set for a meeting to discuss the expense policy, Director Sutton
ended the discussion by stating that she will presume such a meeting will
be public.
CONSIDERATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT POLICY
Manager Holzmeister noted that the proposed policy for abandonment or
relocation of unused reserved easements treats easement relocations
similarly to abandonments. Formerly, there was no set District policy for
relocating a lot line and easement.
Mr. Holzmeister briefly reviewed the proposed procedure and, thereafter,
Director Corbett moved that the Board adopt Resolution No. 8605
establishing District policy for the abandonment or relocation of unused
reserved easements; seconded by Director Cooley. ROLL CALL: All
Directors, aye. SO RESOLVED.
STATUS REPORT ON NEW BUILDING - APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY BUILDING FOR OFFICE
EMPLOYEES - APPROVAL OF CONSULTING CONTRACT FOR FURNISHING NEW COMPLEX
The Manager advised that approximately 50 sets of plans and specifications
have been picked up from Dale Cox - seven or eight by general contractors
and the rest by various subcontractors. A great amount of interest
has been expressed in the project which hopefully ,J , p y , will result in a
savings to the District.
-3-
Office Manager Chapman noted that three decisions should be made by the
Board - 1) approval of an office site; 2) selection of a site for the Board
meetings; 3) approval of anticipated costs relating to the relocation. She
reviewed the office relocation recommendation with the Board. Three sites
were compared in her report , but the space at FHK Shopping Center has been
rented so is no longer a consideration. The remaining two sites are
Truckee Business Park and Pine Tree Plaza/Westgate combination.
The conclusion reached by Mrs. Chapman was to lease space at Truckee
Business Park. At present , it is an empty shell. There is an improvement
allowance in the amount of $19,283 and improvements are estimated to stay
within that allowance. The square footage is 1 ,920, and rental cost is .95
per square foot and .03 per square foot for common area maintenance. The
District would pay utilities , with the exception of sewer, garbage and
water (which are included in the common area maintenance fee). She noted
that office staff will be in one location, parking is good , it is an easy
location for customers to find, there is efficient use of office space, it
is easy to move into the facility, office staff will get used to open
office environment , and modifications to accommodate the computer room are
included in the improvement allowance. Bad points include the crew having
to travel further to work with the Manager and engineering staff, possible
flooding (although this is not likely) , and it may be noisy and hectic with
all the employees working in one room.
President Maass thanked Mary Chapman for the excellent comparison of the
,�.•., three possible relocation sites.
Counsel Phelps reported that he reviewed the lease presented by Truckee
Business Park and, for a short term, thought there would be no problem.
They have agreed to several changes he suggested. The Chairman requested
that a summary of the major points of the lease be prepared for review by
the Board , and Mrs. Chapman asked that Counsel be responsible for its
preparation. There were no objections voiced by the Board.
After some discussion, Director Hamilton moved that the District send a
letter stating its intent to rent space in the Truckee Business Park at the
rates set forth in Mrs. Chapman's report contingent upon making an award
for construction of the new building and with an option to extend the
lease. The motion was seconded by Director Corbett. All Directors, aye,
by voice vote. SO MOVED.
The Manager noted that, with the construction of the new complex, it will
be necessary to purchase some new furnishings. In order to properly
specify furniture for bidding, assistance from a person who knows furniture
will be required. He advised that The Works of Reno, represented by Eileen
Sharp, is a firm that helps businesses acquire furnishings; Mrs. Sharp has
expressed an interest in performing that service for the District.
Mr. Holzmeister went on to say that the District is not planning to replace
all the furniture; much of it is in good condition and will be used in the
new building. However, it is necessary to furnish the Board room, lunch
room and the open office area.
The Board was provided with an outline of services provided by The Works
-4-
and a client list. Mr. Holzmeister recommended authorizing them to assist
the District in drawing up furniture specifications for Board approval at a
cost of not more than $5,500.
After some consideration, Director Hamilton moved that the Board direct the
Manager to seek additional proposals so the Board may compare the services
offered prior to making a decision; seconded by Director Sutton. All
Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTING NEW POLICY FOR APPLICATION OF
ELECTRIC AND STATER SERVICE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND UPGRADES
District Engineer Buckhouse explained to the Board how the TDPUD currently
handles applications for electric and water service for new construction
and upgrades , the development agreement process, and the proposed
development agreement process. There were many questions posed by the
Directors and Director Sutton asked that a workshop be conducted to review
this matter. Director Hamilton moved that the item be put over, and that
the Board be advised why the present procedure isn't working and how the
problem can be solved; seconded by Director Corbett. SO MOVED by
consensus.
KUTTEL REQUEST FOR RELOCATION OF ELECTRICAL LINES
Karl Kuttel, present in the audience, briefly outlined the events
concerning the power lines under which he built his home. He mentioned
that the Building Department issued him a building permit subject to the
PUD agreeing to relocate the power lines, and the fact that a previous
Manager, in 1982, wrote and advised him that the line would be reinstalled
and rerouted in 1983. It was determined that the Board, over the years,
has indicated its intention to "take care of the problem."
After some discussion and Mr. Kuttel's agreement to work with the District
to relocate the lines in a place satisfactory to both him and the PUD,
Director Hamilton moved that the District relocate the lines in the least
expensive manner. He noted that he made the motion because of Mr. Ward's
letter and previous commitments made by the Board, and asked that the Board
be advised of the solution. The motion was seconded by Director Corbett.
Responding to President Maass' question, Counsel advised that a resolution
can be drawn up stating all the facts in this instance in order not to set
a precedent. ROLL CALL: all Directors , aye. SO MOVED, The Chairman
directed Counsel Phelps to prepare a resolution for consideration at the
next meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF LETTER TO CMUA RE BID LIMITS
The Board reviewed Mr. Holzmeister's draft letter to Jerry Jordan of the
California Municipal Utilities Association which suggests initiating
legislation to increase the bid limits and the ordinance requirement.
Director Sutton voiced concern that the increase requested is too high -
the bid limit from $4,000 to $50 ,000, and the ordinance limit from $100,000
to $750,000.
Director Hamilton moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the Board
-5-
-- forward the letter prepared by Manager Holzmeister to the CMUA. ROLL CALL:
all aye. SO MOVED.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ISSUING A
CALL FOR BIDS ON PHASE I OF THE SOUTH RIVER STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
District Engineer Keith Sauers explained to the Board that this project was
approved and let out for bid in 1985; however, only one bid was received
and it was rejected in hopes a better price would be received this year.
Counsel advised that the District's standard construction contract is
included in the bid documents , and it is in order.
Director Sutton expressed concern that the documents do not specify the
class of contractor who may bid this project. She also requested that a
spread sheet be prepared showing the assessment to the involved property
owners , if there is a requirement to hook up to the line and how much of
the cost of the bore and jack work will be provided by the property owners.
The Chairman informed her that this was data was reviewed last Fall, and
asked Mr. Holzmeister to provide Director Sutton with the information.
Director Sutton asked if Counsel Phelps is in a conflict situation since
the brother of one of his partners owns property that will benefit from
this project. (Subsequently , it was learned that Jim Porter and his
brother own this property jointly. ) Mr. Phelps noted that he disclosed
this fact previously, and as a consequence, Mr. McDonough prepared the
agreement between the District and property owners. Mr. Phelps stated he
would withdraw from any involvement in reviewing documents for construction
of the water line project if any Director .felt he was in conflict; there
was no request for him to withdraw.
Mr. Sauers advised that he made a review of the environmental conditions
relative to the project and has completed the environmental impact analysis
form. It qualified for a Class I categorical exemption under Section 15301
of the CEQA guidelines , and he recommended that the Board authorize
adoption of a notice of exemption acknowledging such an exemption.
Director Corbett moved, and Director Hamilton seconded, that the Board
declare the bore and jack pipeline casing project at South River Street a
Class I categorical exemption, and that the Board adopt Resolution No. 8606
approving plans , specifications and issuing a call for bids. ROLL CALL:
all Directors , aye. SO RESOLVED,
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION ON HIRSCHDALE PROJECT
Mr. Holzmeister advised that , in 1973 , a Negative Declaration on the
Hirschdale project was filed with the County and State Clearinghouse, but
there is no record of the Notice of Determination having been filed.
After reviewing the draft, Director Corbett moved, and Director Cooley
seconded, that the Board adopt Resolution No. 8607 authorizing the
President to execute the Notice of Determination relative to the Hirschdale
-6-
water system rehabilitation project. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO
RESOLVED.
REVIEW AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF RESPONSE TO CLEAN-UP AND ABATEMENT ORDER
FROM LASONTAN
Manager Holzmeister noted that as part of the planning for construction of
the new District complex, Kleinfelder and Associates of Reno performed a
soils investigation to provide technical information for designing the
building foundation. The soils investigation involved digging a series of
test pits, and in one test pit an odor of hydrocarbons was encountered and
a film was seen on the water in the bottom of the pit. This was noted in
the report.
Upon review of the Kleinfelder report by the County, a copy was sent to
the SWQCB, Lahontan Region. Lahontan reacted by issuing a Cleanup and
Abatement Order requiring the PUD to submit a report by April 11 , 1986.
Mr. Holzmeister advised that , after meeting with Thomas Kukol of Lahonton,
he drafted a report addressing Lahontan's concerns for the Board's
consideration.
Director Sutton expressed concern that the Lahontan order was not copied to
the Board upon receipt, and also noted she thought the District should have
notified the SWQCB of the Kleinfelder findings rather than waiting for the
County to report the situation to them.
Director Hamilton moved, and Director Corbett seconded, that the Board
approve and forward the report to Lahontan on Cleanup and Abatement Order
No. 86-10. ROLL CALL: all Directors, aye. SO MOVED.
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR LINE PRINTER AND POSSIBLE AWARD
The Office Manager noted that three bids were received, all meeting the
District's specifications for a line printer. She recommended that the
Board award the bid to BDS Corporation, the low bidder. She also suggested
the District keep the existing line printer as a back-up. Director
Hamilton moved , and Director Corbett seconded, that the bid for a line
printer be awarded to BDS Corporation in the amount of $8,150 plus tax.
All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
DISCUSSION OF TRUCKEE INCORPORATION
Director Cooley stated that he talked with representatives of the
California Municipal Utilities Association and the California Special
District Association about incorporation. They indicated to him they have
concerns about users fees and taxes being attached, and he thinks the
District should take a position and keep aware of what's going on.
President Maass noted that the information gathered with respect to the
possible incorporation of Truckee should come out in report form prior to
the matter going to vote.
Counsel Phelps , a member of the Truckee Incorporation Committee, advised
that an updated feasibility study will be available this week, and he will
-7-
provide a copy to the District. He went on to say there will be a series
of LAFCo hearings at which questions will be answered.
Director Sutton asked for a copy of the feasibility study, and suggested it
be reviewed as it relates to the District. She also requested the names of
the incorporation committee members.
Counsel Phelps advised that he would copy the District with a publication
that discusses the types of taxes that an incorporated city may levy.
POSSIBLE AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND APPA AND NWPPA CONFERENCES
Mr. Holzmeister stated he thinks it is a good idea to have representatives
of the PUD at both the American Public Power Association and Northwest
Public Power Association conferences, and noted that funds for this purpose
have been set aside in the budget. Interested Directors should notify Mr.
Holzmeister.
MISCELLANEOUS
Director Sutton suggested that the Board consider applying for disaster aid
because of the problems with the lines (loss of revenue and overtime due to
the heavy storms) in February. Mr. Holzmeister stated he would prepare a
report of storm-related costs. Director Sutton moved, and Director Cooley
seconded, that the Manager determine whether or not the District has a
sufficient amount of damage related to the February storm period that would
justify making application for federal money that would be available to
reimburse the District. ROLL CALL: Cooley and Sutton, aye; Corbett ,
Hamilton and Maass , no. MOTION FAILED.
Director Sutton asked if staff would investigate the hydroelectric project
proposed by a private individual for the Truckee River at Gray Creek, and
the Chairman agreed that this matter should be looked into briefly and a
report given to the Board.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, Director Corbett moved
that the meeting be adjourned at 10:22 P.M. ; seconded by Director Hamilton.
All Directors, aye, by voice vote. SO MOVED.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
By
J s A. Maass, President
Prepared b
Susan M. Craig, Deputy District Cl
d5a/6
-8-