HomeMy WebLinkAbout8 District Organization Study Agenda Item #
TRUCKEE DONNER
public Utility District
Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
From: Peter Holzmeister
Date: May 14, 2004
Date of Board Meeting: May 19, 2004
Subject: District organization atudy
1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD: This is an issue that was raised at
the last strategic plan workshop. We were directed to bring this matter back to the board
for discussion.
2. HISTORY: At the strategic plan meeting we discussed problems we were having in
efficiently sharing information. We discussed the need to look at our entire management
information system. We also discussed the fact that the District service territory has
grown significantly over the last twenty years, and the District's professional capability
has improved in recent years, and yet the District's organizational structure has
remained essentially unchanged, except for minor adjustments.
A committee was appointed to work with me to evaluate these options. The committee
has met and I have met several times with the management staff. We have looked at
various options. However, we have reached the point where we believe that input from
an outside professional would be useful.
3. NEW INFORMATION: After we had looked at structure and management issues for
some considerable time I began to feel that we may have not thought through the
various issues carefully enough. Modifying an organization's management structure and
information system should not be taken lightly. I decided to talk with Bob Rauch about
the issues. He suggested I call Glen Reiter.
I called Glen Reiter and had a lengthy conversation with him, and asked him to provide a
proposal to help us further. Attached is a proposal from Glen Reiter of Reiter Lowry
Associates to conduct a brief study of some issues we have raised in our review of the
organization structure. Also attached is information about the Reiter Lowry firm.
I would like to discuss this matter is more detail at the workshop on May 19.
4. RECOMMENDATION: This is a workshop item; no action is anticipated.
..........-.............
Reiter. Lowry, Consultants
11417 West Bernardo Court San Diego, CA 92127-1639 858-61-,5-4400 858-675-9424
April 16, 2004
Mr. Peter L. HOlznlCiSter
Trukee Donner Public Utility District
11570 Donner Pass Road
Trukee, CA 96160
Subject: Proposal, or Phuse 1:
Reconnaissance Study and Problem Identification
Dear Peter,
It was a pleasure speaking to you about the state of affairs at Trukee Donner Public
Utility District. During our Phone conversation you shared several areas of colleen). I
have listed them as follows:
1. The timely closing of work orders
2. Timely submission of field data
3. Purchasing and warehousing inventory and control
4. GIS system integration
5. Accounting for developer costs and their proper billing
6. The number of funds and cash flow tracking
7. Monthly operating and capital spending reports
8. Coordination between daily operations and new construction
9. Accessible financial information to assist management
After reading the material that You provided to me, I can appreciate your desire to look at
the aforementioned items. When I was the General Manager and Chief Engineer of the
Otay Municipal Water District, we also went through a period where we were rapidly
expanding our existing service requirements as well as developing new services. We
experienced the same concerns.
I will also agree with you that identifying the reason why there is a problem is the key to
a good solution. For that rationale, I would suggest that we approach the study in phases.
Phase I would be a reconnaissance study. The purpose would be to zero-in on what
specifically needs to be examined and which workproduct should be delivered.
This effort would include a 2-day on-site visit with staff to discuss the above issues and
uncover any other potential concerns. We will examine how the District currently
conducts its business, and which opportunities exist to improve its business practices.
In addition, we would meet with staff to determine what they believe they need in the
way of management information so that they may more effectively do their jobs.
Since the District presently provides two essential services to the community, and is now
considering expansion of its broad band service as well, a business model will be
essential in developing "what if' scenarios. We have found that a business model that
allows the user to change their assumptions will ultimately become an invaluable tool in
making decisions and testing the outcome before the decision is implemented. To begin
this process, a portion of the on-site time will be spent on examining those areas of your
operation that can be modeled so that you may more effectively manage each activity.
Upon completion of the on-site meeting, we would prepare a letter report which would
outline the information that was discovered. We would pay particular attention to those
areas that offer opportunity for improvement. In addition, we would identify the
necessary tasks to resolve the specific issues that were identified during the €
reconnaissance study. �
't
r
ekere owry. onsuitants t.
--.-__. -------
It is estimated that 32 to 40 hours would be necessary to produce the Phase I letter report.
The estimated cost would be $4,800 to $6,000 plus actual expenses for travel and
lodging. Billing would be at$150 per hour.
We have recently completed a business model for the City of Corona Electric Utility and
have a great appreciation for the complexity and dynamics of the electric industry. We
are currently preparing an update to the plan since the industry is constantly changing.
As you are fully aware, the personal computer has provided us with a great tool to create
and analyze information. The key however, is to make sure we gather and analyze the
right information, not just volumes of data.
We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working
with you. If this proposal is acceptable please sign below and return it to us. With many
thanks.
Respectfully, Accepted
Glenn M. Reiter Peter L. Holzmeister General Manager
Re-e(> Owz}+ on.suitants
xerter Lowry Consultants Page I of 2
Home Feedback Services
About Us
Reiter Lowry Consultants
Financial e? Management conrultzng rer�nces for rpecial djS1tj6,jf andpublic agencef
Special Districts and public agencies are profoundly impacted by current economic, legislative, and population
changes. Challenges to productivity and revenue generation are unprecedented and call for experience-based
solutions.
The principals of Reiter Lowry Consultants offer 60 Years of combined experience in the engineering, design,
construction, operations,governance, finances and management of large and small agencies.
Contact Information
Telephone
858-675-4400
FAX
858-675-9424
Postal address
16980 Via Tazon #230
San Diego, CA 92127-1647
Electronic mail
General Information: 1i. f ici/,i i;7jj
Webmaster:
[Home]
Send mail to T Eaton with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright @ 2003 Reiter Lowry Consultants
Last modified: 12/04/03
i
s
s
f
{
http://www.reiterlowry.com/ 5/14/2004
KLU Jervlces Yage Page 1 of 2
Nome Feedback Services About Us
Services
P'nan ial&Management consulting renu ce.r fbr spedal districts and-public agencies
Reiter • Lowry• Consultants specializes in strategic cost control and revenue generation plans. Today's fiscal
environment requires that a successful financial plan reflect improvement and replacement costs for the next
20 years or more. Because these costs must legally be apportioned between current and future users,we work
with clients to develop a plan that considers public sentiment as well as current law. A comprehensive
financial strategy considers the cost of today s facilities,which benefit existing users, as well as future users.
Fk Finance
Reiter • Lowry• Consultants provides its clients with a comprehensive range of financial services to help
develop and implement successful financial strategies.
Assessments
Reiter• Lowry• Consultants has a proven track record in providing complete direct assessment services for
many special districts throughout California. The firm has successfully administered assessment programs
since 1989. All services are tailored to meet the individual and unique needs of any agency.
Facilities
Public agencies concerned with the best plan to maintain and operate their facilities benefit from our firm s
comprehensive facility planning services.
Administration
A strong alliance between Board members and staff is critical to a successful operation. Clear definitions of
accountability,responsibility, and authority are needed, as well as consistently good communication. We
provide services that help our clients develop the relationships necessary to succeed.
Accounting
Reiter • Lowry• Consultants can provide your district or agency with a wide range of accounting services. We
know how difficult it is to trust someone else with your finances, so we provide our customers with the
greatest level of confidentiality and accuracy possible. Whether you need Bill service accounting or only
customer billing, we can help. We customize our services to fit your needs.
http://www.reiterlowry.com/services.htm 5/14/2004
Kt t- Services Yage Page ?of 2
Send mail to T. Eaton with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright O 2003 Reiter Lowry Consultants
Last modified: 12/04/03
i
5
3
3
http://www.reiterlowry.com/services,htm 5/14/2004
t1VVUt US
Page 1 of 2
Home Feedback Services
About Us
About Us
Financial 6 Management consulting services for special districts and public agencies
Company Profile
Since 1981, Reiter Lowry Consultants has provided clients with
innovative, cost-effective solutions in the areas of strategic financial
management, facility planning and financing, capital improvement
planning, rate setting and revenue analysis. The firm pioneered the
use of computer-based models for long-range financial forecasting,
revenue generation and customer impact analysis. These models
have resulted in a variety of sophisticated, comprehensive and
successful rate strategies for many public agencies. Our
combination of practical and consulting experience uniquely
qualifies us to recommend effective strategies to address challenges
facing agencies today.
Glenn M. Reiter
A Registered Civil Engineer with the State of California, Class A
Engineering Contractor license, is a leader in developing sound and
?. wise capital improvement programs that fit an agency's ability to
pay. His focus is on integrating client capital improvement
programs into long-range financial strategies. Over the past 40
years, Mr. Reiter has held a variety of positions including General
Manager and Chief Engineer of a water and sewer agency, Director
of Regional Water Authority, Executive Director and founder of the
Special District Association and San Diego LAFCO Advisory
Committee Chairman. He has written numerous papers on Special
Districts and has lectured extensively on Special District
Management, Finance and Administration.
Gregg A. Lowry
rf,
Mr. Low is the firm's consulting en project�' g engineer and director of ro ect 1
research. He provides insightful technologically advanced solutions
http://www.reiterlowry.com/Company%a20Profile.htm 5/14/2004 g
r�uvut v5
Page 2 of 2
in the areas of finance, operations, administration, engineering,
human resources and data processing. Mr. Lowry's agency
management experience includes the positions of Assistant General
Manager, Engineer, Public Works Director, Construction Manager,
and Contracts Manager. He has an established reputation as an
accomplished engineer with savvy financial management experience
and practical hands-on problem solving focus.
Send mail to T. Eaton with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright @ 2003 Reiter Lowry Consultants
Mast modified: 12/04/03
F
f
Y
http://www.reiterlowry.com/Company%20Profile.htm 5/14/2004 i
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
What issues did the strategic plan raise and what did it
conclude?
Water : Management Information Systems (MIS)
• Spend too much time on administration
• Record keeping
Support Services: MIS
• Need to Bar Code and track inventory
• Not linked to GIS or accounting
• Going backward
• This is a cost and efficiency issue. Less errors
Electric: MIS
• Have portable GIS. How to do work orders. Need to take
advantage of it for efficiency.
• Design Integration
• Outage management
Broadband: MIS
• Need to integrate GIS with broadband
• Question: outsource or In-house management of network itself
Admin Services: MIS
• Work order accounting; closing process- 20 years old and
overloaded
• Must rethink process or add people
• Newer information systems such as GIS not integrated with
work order #
• This is not a technology problem- rather a management
process. Need to tie systems in separate departments i
together.
• Departments- starting to bump heads. Can't share information.
General Manager• Internal Management Processes
• We have grown in terms Of customers.
• Organization needs to change-realize how organization works
and change ourselves.
• Also adding new services, but using same managerial
processes as 20 years ago. Need to change management to
match new reality.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
ACTION PLAN
Management Information System
• Need help analyzing the problem and suggesting solution
• Need to make information available
• Have to interface with the utility software- NISC
• GIS is infrastructure data (Ian is trying to interface with
NISC)
• Work flow process what does final process need to be.
Action: Find a consultant (similar to finance consultant) to
advise on how to proceed
Who. Peter Holzmeister
Organization and Management
• Staff already at max. Difficulty getting beyond fires.
• Several key managers not too many years form retirement.
• Growth will continue and compound the challenge.
• Assistant General Manager has multiple responsibilities.
• Human Resources- an organizational challenge
• Growth Perspective: 80% increase in customers; 40% in staff
• Summary of new needs:
■ Human Resources
■ Assistant General Manager
• Finance
• Need more focus, direction, accountability
Action: President appoint a ad hoc committee to develop a new
organizational plan to bring to Board
i
Who: Board president and committee (Ron Hemig, Jim Maass
and Peter Holzmeister)
{
{
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
WHAT HAS HAPPENED?
Committee has met
Management team has met
We evaluated various organizational structures
Management information and organizational structure are tied
together
What is the nature of our organization?
• We provide water and electric service to 11 ,000 customers —
rates (Broadband)
• We expand our service to new development — fees and
development agreements
These are two very different processes
• Different people
• Different thought process
• Different funding
We need to organize accordingly
Bob Rauch and Glenn Reiter
The Glen Reiter proposal
• Two day reconnaissance study
• Develop scope for further study
• $4,800 to $6,000
• Within my authority, but a new consulting firm
z
Consideration of a motion expressing the board's intent and understanding relating to
construction of the broadband system and LAFCo approval. (Gov Code Section 54954.2
(b) 2, requires two thirds vote of the board to add this item to the agenda)
I move that the board express its intent and understanding as follows:
1. The District has applied to Nevada LAFCo for activation of a latent power so it can
deploy a telecommunications system and offer broadband service within our service
area.
2. Nevada LAFCo has given conditional approval to our application. Final approval will
be given when we have complied with LAFCo requirements as set forth in their
Resolution Number 01-01.
3. The District has proceeded to secure bids for supply of electronic components and for
construction of the system. This was necessary to secure financing for the project. The
securing of financing for the project is necessary in order to satisfy the LAFCo
requirement for a risk mitigation plan. The securing of construction bids, securing of
financing and preparation of the risk mitigation plan are interrelated such that they need
to proceed simultaneously. The District has not and will not enter into contracts for
acquisition of electronic components or for construction of the system until a final
decision has been made by LAFCo and has been approved by this board.
a