HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 Water Supply and Drought PlanJ A
ACTION
To: Board of Directors
From: Steven Poncelet
Date: June 01, 2016
Subject: Consideration of Water Supply and Drought Plan
1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD
This item involves Board certification of adequacy of the District's water supply and
consideration of changing mandatory restrictions on outdoor watering with potable
water based on recent action by the California State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) regarding emergency drought regulations.
2. HISTORY
The District has a long history of strong stewardship of our water resources and on
promoting the benefits of conserving water before, during, and after a drought. The
District has aggressively installed water meters well before the California mandate,
fixed leaks in our water Distribution system, and delivered conservation programs to
our customers. This has resulted in a reduction in water production of over 40% since
2006 during a period of signficant growth (Attachment 1).
The District has also advocated and supported the development of robust science to
understand how the aquifer functions and to understand the sustainable yield of the
Martis Valley aquifer which is the District's main source of groundwater. This includes
supporting decades of studies and playing a key role in the United States Bureau of
Reclamation's Truckee River Basin study which includes a state-of-the-art
groundwater model and climate change modeling. The significant body of science
indicates that current water production is still a small fraction of recharge and
sustainable yield and future supplies are projected to be well above build -out
projections.
The District, as required by the California Department of Water Resources, has an
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) which gets updated every 5-years. The
main function of UWMP's is to document current and future water supplies and match
them against current and future demands. The UWMP includes a Water Shortage
Contingency Plan and implementation of District Ordinance(s). These are some of
the tools that the District has in place to respond to water shortages or emergency
drought regulations.
The District's Board had many meetings over the last few years to review and
implement the SWRCB's 2014, 2015, 2016 emergency drought regulations. These
regulations had a series of prohibitions against the waste of water which apply to all
Californian's. The prohibitions against waste that remain in effect today include:
• Waste of potable water in irrigation systems from runoff;
• Washing a motor vehicle with potable water from a hose that does not have
a shut-off valve;
• Application of potable water to driveways and sidewalks;
• Use of potable water in a fountain/water feature that does not recirculate,
• The application of potable water to outdoor landscapes during and up to 48
hours after measurable rainfall;
• The serving of drinking water other than upon request in eating or drinking
establishments;
• Option of not choosing to have towels and linens laundered daily in hotels or
motels;
• Irrigating outside new construction not in accordance with regulations or
codes; and
• Irrigating turf on public street medians.
In late 2015, Govenor Brown again extended California's drought emergency and
directed the SWRCB to adopt new 2016 emergency drought regulations. The
SWRCB solicited feedback from the public and took action in February, 2016 to
continue the emergency drought regulations with only minor changes. The new
impacts to the District from the 2016 SWRCB emergency drought regulations
included:
• 25% Conservation Target;
• Compliance period from March, 2016 through October, 2016;
• On -going prohibitions against wasting water; and
• On -going notification, regulatory reporting, and enforcement requirements.
To comply with the SWRCB 25% conservation target, the District Board took the
following action and recommendations:
• Continue with Stage 4 of Ordinance No. 2014-05 and define the 2-day per
week restriction on outdoor irrigation as follows: residential customers only
on Tuesday's and Friday's; non-residential Customer's only on Mondays and
Thursday's;
• Continue to consider petitions for hardship from commercial, non -ornamental
landscapes users to be given a target in lieu of the prescriptive restriction;
• Continue to promptly notify customers of continuous flow alarms and promote
prompt action to fix customer leaks; and
• Continue to promote the District's "Watch Your Water" campaign.
However, Governor Brown did also direct the SWRCB to evaluate the status of the
drought at the end of April, 2016 and to take action at their May 18, 2016 meeting if
the situation has gotten significantly better or worse. This winter, has been well
documented, has been fairly wet for much of the State and many regions are no
longer experiencing a water shortage.
There was mounting pressure on the SWRCB to relax or remove restriction on water
use for regions that are not experiencing a water supply shortage (which has included
the Truckee -Tahoe region since the beginning but which now includes numerous
regions across California).
3. NEW INFORMATION
The SWRCB solicited feedback from Urban Water Suppliers and others in April and
early May, 2016 regarding potential changes to the emergency drought regulations
given the current hydrologic conditions. The overwhelming feedback, including from
the District, our Martis Valley Groundwater partners, and many others in the Truckee.
Tahoe region, was that many regions have adequate water supply and that there is no
basis for continuing emergency regulations. The water agencies proposed rescinding
the mandatory reduction targets and allowing each Urban Water Supplier to self -
certify the adequacy of supply and to take appropriate action regarding mandatory
restrictions. The water agencies pointed out that each agency was in the process of
completing the 5-year update of the UWMP's due in July, 2016 so we all had the data
readily available to accurately match water supply and demand. The end result would
be a lifting of the mandatory restrictions on outdoor watering with potable water which
would be replaced by action by the local Urban Water Suppliers based on local
conditions and needs.
The SWRCB, at their May 18th meeting, took action which extended the emergency
drought regulations through January, 2017 and which kept in place the 9 prohibitions
against wasting water which were listed earlier in this docket and which can be found
on the District's website at www.tdpud.org, The District will continue to enforce these
restrictions while the drought emergency remains in effect. In addition, the SWRCB
did follow the recommendation of the Urban Water Suppliers by rescinding the
mandatory reduction targets and asking the local agencies to self -certify the adequacy
of supply and take the appropriate actions. The SWRCB directed that this self -
certification start with current water supply condition and then evaluate the adequacy
of supply using actual water supply and demand for a three dry year period (2013,
2014, and 2015) going forward.
If an Urban Water Supplier can document full supplies over this time -frame, then the
SWRCB would not require mandatory restrictions on outdoor irrigation with potable
water. The SWRCB does not need to approve the self -certification or the actions
taken by local Urban Water Suppliers but the SWRCB did reserve the right to reject
the self -certifications and actions that do not meet specified criteria. The new SWRCB
emergency drought regulations take effect on June 1st and run through January,
2017. The self -certifications and actions taken by the local Urban Water Suppliers
can take effect immediately but must be presented to the SWRCB by June 22, 2016.
District staff have completed the District's 2016 UWMP update and the Board has had
multiple meetings on this subject and are scheduled to adopt the new plan at the June
11 2016 meeting. As presented in the 2016 UWMP, the District's current and projected
future water demands are well below the current and projected water supply. Again,
this assessment is based on a significant amount of scientific data on the annual
recharge and sustainable yield of the Martis Valley groundwater basin. In addition,
District staff have analyzed the potential impacts of three dry years using actual
production and demand for 2013, 20147 and 2015 and again, have found that the
District has adequate water supplies by a large margin to cover this period. This is
based on production data and groundwater levels for the District's production and
CASGEM wells in the Martis Valley groundwater basin for a period covering
2006-2015 (see Attachment 2).
Based on this analysis of adequacy of water supply, District staff does not see a
justification to maintain mandatory water restrictions when there is no water supply
emergency. However, staff does feel that a message of "Conservation is no longer
necessary" is not in the interest of the District, our customers, or the community.
Staff, as a result, is recommending that the District rescind the current mandatory
restrictions (Stage 4, Water Shortage Contingency Plan) and replace this with Stage 1
(voluntary 10% reduction).
By taking this action, the District will still be sending a strong message to save water
and keep enforcement powers in play should they be needed. Along with the
voluntary 10% reduction, District Staff will also have a very robust communications
and outreach effort to educate our customers about the change in emergency drought
restrictions and the benefits of conserving water. One key message will be a
voluntary request to only water every other day since this is adequate for the vast
majority of the irrigated landscapes in our service territory.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
Removing the mandatory restrictions will have some fiscal benefit to the District due to
reduced communications and enforcement activities. However, the new emergency
drought regulations were extended through January, 2017 and the District will need to
continue to report monthly to the SWRCB and will continue to do enforcement for the
remaining restrictions.
Fiscal impacts from the 2014 & 2015 emergency drought regulations included costs to
implement and enforce (staff time, web -work, all -customer mailer) along with
decreased District revenue due to mandatory conservation. Fiscal impacts for the
new emergency drought regulations are projected to be less. It is estimated that the
labor and direct cost to comply with the SWRCB's emergency drought regulations are
�$100,000 per year.
5. RECOMMENDATION
1) Accept staffs self -certification analysis and direct the General Manager to submit a
self -certification form to the CEC based on the data presented with this Action Item.
2) Direct the General Manager to rescind Stage 4 of Ordinance 2014-05 and replace it
with Stage 1 (voluntary 10% reduction) effective immediately.
Steven Poncelet
Public Information &Conservation Manager
Michael D. Holley
General Manager
Attachment 1
TDPUD Annual Water Production
8000
238.5
7000 270.9
274.6
338A
000
603.1 635.7
840.8
LL
N 5000 548.9
i ' 699.1
CJ
Q
4000 5822I
3000
2000 -- -
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Production Year
� Potable Water 'Non-P®table Wells
100
300
U
f6
L
c 400
L
Q.
a�
500
v
m
v
600
700
Attachment 2
TDPUD Well Levels (Martis Valley Groundwater Basin)
,�° titi atiti titi �titi ti� �titi titititi ti� �tii �� ti° �ti°` �� ° ti� �y� tih ti� �ti°
e� �a Q�aO �o ��� `Sa Q�° �a� Q� ��� p� fat` Q� >�� p� �z� QQ ��� p� lac QQ ��� p� lac Q�
Airport Well
- Fiberboard Well
Glenshire Dr
Well
Martis Valley
Well
Old Greenwood
Prosser Village
Well
Prosser Heights
Well
Prosser Annex
Well
Sanders Well