HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 2017 Purchase Power Load Budget ForecastAgenda Item
To: Board of Directors
From: Stephen Hollabaugh
Date: March 7, 2018
#13
Subject: Discussion of 2017 Purchase Power Load, Resources, Peaks,
and Comparison to 2017 Budget Forecast
1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD
This workshop is to review the District's actual versus budgeted purchase power costs and
energy consumption for 2017.
2. HISTORY
On September 16, 2015, the workshop "FY16 and FY17 Budget: Purchase Power Plan" was
presented to the Board. This workshop covered the following topics:
Mission Statement and Objectives, Renewable Portfolio Standard Target, Conservation as First
Resource, Diversified Power Supply Plan, Future Renewable Resources, CARB Cap and Trade,
Proposed Resources for 2016 & 2017, Risk to Budget Analysis, and 2016 & 2017 Forecast
Costs.
The Purchase Power Plan 2016 and 2017 Budget was approved by the Board on November 18,
2015. The 2017 Purchase Power Plan budgeted amounts, based on a forecasted energy
purchase of 163,421 MWh, are shown in the following table:
Cost Component FY17 Budget $per MWh
Total Energy Supply -Various $11,681,375 $71.48
Transmission Wheelinq - SPPC $ 927,156 $ 5.67
Totals $12,6089531 $77.15
3. NEW INFORMATION
Summary budgeted versus actual amounts for FY17 are shown in the following table:
Description FY17 Actual
Budget
Total Energy Purchases $12,6081531 $11,504,139
Total Energy Consumption, MWh 163,421 1647324
Purchase Cost per MWh $77.15 $70.01
• The total purchased power costs were 8.8% less than budgeted and total energy
consumption was about 0.6% more than forecasted during 2017. The two major factors that
affect the total purchased power cost are resource cost and energy consumption by our
customers.
All these factors helped to reduce the District's actual purchased energy cost to $70.01 per MWh,
about 9.3% under budget. Energy costs and consumption by month are graphically depicted
below.
Budaeted versus actual
$13,000,000
$12,000,000
$11,000,000
$10,000,000
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$�,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
r aurchase cost for 2017 is shown in araah below:
Ff I Power Purchase Cost
Budget Actual
5C COStS:
nsmission
;al Energy Supply
Budgeted versus actual monthly MWh consumption for 2017 is shown in graph below:
17 f1lonthly Energy. • •
000
000
16,000 '
Budgeted
000 1
81000 1 0 Actual
61000 1
000
000
,I���������i�
SEPTJAN MAR MAY JULY •
The Monthly Peak MW for 2008 through 2017 is shown in the graph below:
Monthly Peak MW
2008 thru 2017
40.0
35.0 - 2017 Peak MW
30.0 _ _ _ 2016 Peak MW
2015 Peak MW
25.0 - - -
Ij J ■2014Peak MW
{
20.0 'i — — — ! — — ',� '� — — — — —`f — — - r 2013 Peak MW
r'
15.0 — — — — — 0 2012 Peak MW
I 2011 Peak MW
i
_
10.0 — — ■2010Peak MW
5.0
1 ' — i ■ 2009 Peak MW
I
a
0.0 { j !1i UI 2008Peak MW
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
The District experienced its 2017 peak load of 33.3 MW in January. The summer months have
a constant load with a small peak in July.
History of Actual vs. Budget vs. Sales (MWh)
Total Bulk Power
170,000
165,000
160,000
155,000
L
m 150,000
s 145,000
140,000
135,000
130,000
125,000
120,000
,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo do ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo do ,yo ,yo ,yo
—•—Actual MWh
Budget MWh
o Sales MWh
Annual Graph of Resources used for 201 t
2017 RESOURCE MIX
Carbon Free
Resources
Unspecified Pool 67%
26%
Natural Gas
7%
Resources (MWh) by Year 2014 — 2030
Heat Recovery
6%
qwSmall Hydro
17% ■ Natural Gas
Landfill Gas ■ Unspecified Pool
15% Heat Recovery
■ Small Hydro
Wind a Landfill Gas
29% Wind
Resources (MWh) By Year 2014 - 2030
200,000
180,000 2016 2017
160,000 Open Position-UAMPS Pool / Mkt
rj Veyo Heat Recovery 2017
140,000
Horse Butte Wind - Wind
120,000 Nebo Power Plant - Natural Gas
100,000 s Pleasant Valley - Wind
■ Fallon Exchange for Stampede
80,000 Stampede -Small Hydro
60,000 - ■ Trans Jordan - Land Fill Gas
■ TOD Small Hydro
40,000
Five-year Market 2017-22 (New)
20,000 Five-year Market 2012-17 (Exist)
0 -- - - ,
On December 7, 2011, the Board approved the Renewable Energy Resources Procurement
Plan per Senate bill 1x2. This plan defines the minimum required percentage of renewables per
compliance period based on total retail energy sales. Compliance periods and percent
renewables are as follows:
Period 1 - January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 - 20%
Period 2 - January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 - 25%
Period 3 - January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2020 - 33%
Section 3201 (bb) of the CEC regulations define retail sales as: "Sale of electricity by a PUD to
end -use -customers and their tenants, measured in MWh. This does not include energy
consumption by a POU, electricity used by a POU for water pumping, or electricity produced for
onsite consumption (self-qeneration)." Therefore the retail sales for this calculation is equal to
156,562 - 6,863 - 492=149,207 MWh
The District's estimated renewable energy portfolio performance for 2017 is shown in the table
below:
Eligible Renewables (CPUC)
Small Hydro
MWh REC's
6,607
Sales
Landfill Gas 25,079 16.8%
Wind
Heat Recovery (w/o REC's)
Unbundled REC's(Small hydro at Heat
Recovery)
Additional Unbundled REC's
Totals
461413 31.1 %
19,559 13.1
65.4%
The Veyo (heat recovery) and TCID (small hydro) projects do not come with REC's. Since
these are carbon free resources, the District purchased 19,559 REC's to try to cover
these resources. These resources actually generated 22,155 MWh in 2017. The District
was able to also acquire at a very low price an additional 20,000 REC's from the Pleasant
Valley Wind project. The table below shows the total 2017 REC's.
Eligible Renewables (CPUC) MWh REC's
Small Hydro 6,607
Landfill Gas 25,079
Wind 46,413
Heat Recovery (w/o REC's) 0
Unbundled REC's(Small hydro & Heat Recoverv) 191559
Additional Unbundled REC's 201000
Totals
Sales
California Air Resources 0oard (GARB) Cap and Trade
The CARB has started their Cap and Trade auctions in 2013. Section 95892(d)(3) of the
regulation states the following.
"Auction proceeds and allowance value obtained by the electric distribution utility shall
be used exclusively for the benefit of the retail ratepayers of each distribution utility,
consistent with the goals of A1332, and may not be used for the benefit of entities or
persons other than such ratepayers."
Board decided to use the auction proceeds to offset the price of renewable therefore
meeting the goals of A1332.
Four auctions have been held in 2017, below are the results:
Settlement Price ($/Allowance)
TDPUD Revenue from Sale of Allowances
$13.57
(Auction 10,
2017)
$123,623
$13.80
(Auction 11,
2017)
$398,682
$14.75
(Auction 12,
2017)
$295,000
$13.57
(Auction 13,
2017
$323,067
(To
be
used in 2018)
Total $
$11140,372
In FY18, $1,140,372 has been budgeted as revenue to help pay for renewable resources and in
FY19, $1,126,330 has been budgeted in the same manner.
ACHIEVEMENTS
Excellence in Government Award
Truckee Donner PUD received the Truckee Chamber of Commerce's Excellence in
Government Award on October 20, 2017. This awards is presented to recognize the local
government entity who best exemplified outstanding involvement in the community and its
issues, those who have contributed significantly to our economy and local labor market.
RP3 -Reliable Public Power Provider
Truckee Donner PUD has earned the Reliable Public Power Provider designation from the
American Public Power Association for providing consumers with the highest degree of reliable
and safe electric service. Truckee Donner PUD received the Platinum level in 2017, the
second highest award level of the RP3 designation (announcement will take place in April). We
received the Gold Level designation in 2014. All RP3 designations are valid for three years.
Truckee Donner PUD Recovers from Huge Winter Storms
From mid -January until late February, a series of winter storms dumped over 200 inches of
snow in the greater Truckee area. The severe wind and snow caused numerous power
outages which resulted in school closures and traffic delays. The main causes of power
outages and transients were the heavy snow load on trees and power lines. Although some
customers were without power overnight, crews were able to minimize outage times for most
customers by isolating the cause of the outage and used switching operations to restore power
from other parts of the electric distribution system. At the peak of the storm damage, the
District had 3,000 customers out of power, or about 20 of the entire system. District electric
crews worked day and night to restore power as quickly as possible and to keep our
community safe.
Financial
The Electric Operations Department was over budget for FY 17 by about $1,0001000. This
was due to the storm damage that occurred in January and February. The District was able to
obtain FEMA money to help cover the cost of the storm damage in an amount of $1,124,067.
With this money from FEMA, the District was able to offset almost all of the storm damage
costs.
Capital Improvements
As part of our ongoing commitment to provide customers with the highest degree of reliable
and safe electric service, the District has replaced over 100 wood distribution poles in our
service territory. Conductors and other facilities were upgraded to ensure long life and
continued reliability.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
Detailed budgeted versus actual amounts for 2017 are shown in the following table:
Summary 2017 Budget vs Actual
Power Purchases, MWh Budget Actual
Total Energy Purchase, MWh 163,421 164,324
Percent Difference, Actual vs. Budget
0.6%
Power Purchase Costs Budget Actual
Total Energy Supply - UAMPS, WAPA, etc $11,681,375 $10,763,649
Transmission - NV Energy
Scheduling - NCPA
WAPA cost/(credit)
Misc Costs: WECC, WREGIS, etc.
Total Power Purchase Cost
$ Over/(Under) Budget
Percent Difference, Actual vs. Budget
$927,156
$0
$0
$0
$12, 608,531
$707,809
$0
$0
$321681
4139
$11
,50,
$1,104,392
-8.8%
Purchase Cost per MWh$70.01
Percent Difference, Actual vs. Budget
Peak Load Information
District Peak Load, MW
Percent Difference, Actual vs. Budget
5. RECOMMENDATION
Receive and comment on this report.
Budget
36.0
-J.3%
Actual
33.3
-T5%
we 4
Stephen Hollabaugh Michael D. Holley
Assistant General Manager General Manager