HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 Power Point Update Nevada County LAFCo Status
Action# 12 July 6, 2011 Services AgreementConsideration of Professional County LAFCo Processes and Update on the Status of Nevada
Update on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 2 th 10JuneonLAFCoCountyNevadatosubmittedSOIPreferred•SOI2011preferredthedevelophelpedBaraccoBruce•LAFCoCountyNevadafromSOIproposednewareceivedDistrict•Backgr
ound / History and a Professional Services Agreement
New Information and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 3 and conversely parcels that should not have voting rights dovoting rights that currently
cannot vote in District elections; Issue 4: There may be some parcels that should have •records show as outside the jurisdictional boundarieswithin the District’s jurisdictional boundaries
that LAFCo Issue 3: There are four areas believed by District staff to be •within the District’s service territoryNOTthat were never annexed by the District and are therefore Issue
2: There are parcels legitimately served by the District •preferred SOI are substantially differentIssue 1: The LAFCo proposed SOI and the District’s •
4
5
6
7
8
9
New Information and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 10 Provides for adequate CEQA review•Baracco and Associates submitted a proposal•Bruce Baracco
assisted with the preferred SOI•District is not an expert in LAFCo processes•District is not a land use planning agency•
Fiscal Impact 50%50%4-100%350%50%290%10%1ElectricWaterIssue and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 11 Department Costs to be allocated between
the Water and Electric •Sufficient funds exist within the FY11 Budget•
Recommendation and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 12 50.642,24$exceedtonotamountanforauthorizationorderchangepercent10aplus675,22$totalingAssociatesBaraccow
ithAgreementServicesConsultingtheApprove•
Recommendation cont.,and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 13 served by the District, direct staff not to pursue annexationIf the Board decides
not to annex properties currently •ORdirect staff to begin the annexation processwishes to annex properties currently served by the District, annexed areas, if the Board -With respect
to Issue 2, non•
Recommendation cont.,and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 14 boundaries to be compliant with Board actions, direct staff If the Board does not
wish to correct the jurisdictional •ORDistrict’s jurisdictional boundaries these areas to be accepted by LAFCo as being in the direct staff to pursue this issue with the desired outcome
for boundaries to be compliant with previous Board actions, Issue 3, if the Board wishes to correct the jurisdictional •
Recommendation cont.,and a Professional Services AgreementUpdate on Status of Nevada County LAFCo 15 County Registrar of Voters to resolve voting inconsistenciesIssue 4, direct staff
to work with the Nevada and Placer •