Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 Claim Mark SteinerAgenda Item # 14 ACTION To: Board of Directors From: Kim Harris Date: July 15, 2015 Subject: Reject the Claim from Mark Steiner 1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD The Board must take action on this claim. 2. HISTORY In 2004, the District entered into an "On -Site Water Development Agreement" with Shire Investments, LLC (Developer) to construct water infrastructure for the Pinyon Creek Townhomes, located on Hwy 267. The project was originally planned for one phase of construction. At the request of the Developer (Mark Steiner), the project was split into two phases. Phase I was completed in 2006, but the required "looped" section of the water main was to be completed in Phase 2. As part of the agreement, to ensure the completion of the agreed upon project, the District collected a $39,000 "construction guarantee" deposit from the Developer to ensure the agreed upon "Looped Water System" was constructed at the site. In 2009, the property was foreclosed upon, prior to the water system being completed. In October 2014, the District received an Application for Construction from Ms. Mimi Ash for the development of the Pinyon Creek property, including the water system infrastructure. Placer County records show that the property was sold November 12, 2014 to The Metro Group. On April 14, 2015, the District sent a letter to Ms. Mimi Ash, The Metro Group, Inc., with the understanding that she is the owner of the Pinyon Creek Phase II. The letter further stated that Ms. Ash would "be entitled to receive any refund of the financial guarantee in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Letter" and requested her to provide any documentation to support this position. A copy of the letter was sent to Mark Steiner, Pinyon Creek LLC, which is designated in the Agreement as the recipient of any notices under the Agreement. 3. NEW INFORMATION On May 21, 2015, a claim letter was sent to the District via First Class Mail by Klaus J. Kolb, attorney for Mark Steiner, requesting return of the $39,000 deposit to his client. The conditions of the Agreement, the completion of the water infrastructure for the Pinyon Creek project has not been completed. The deposited funds are to be used toward the construction of this pipeline. In order for the water main to be completed, the District has two options: (1) to complete the original Phase II connection or (2) add a new section to the Phase I pipeline. The claimant, Mr. Steiner, has been noed, via the public Board Agenda for the July 151 2015 meeting, of the of the District's recommended rejection of this claim to return the $39,000 deposit due to the conditions of the Agreement not being completed. 4. FISCAL IMPACT As this is a customer deposit, there is no fiscal impact to the District. 5. RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is to deny the claim from Mr. Steiner to return the $39,000 deposit and direct staff to send a Notice of Rejection of Claim within 10 days. Kim Harris Human Resource Manager Michael D. Holley General Manager