HomeMy WebLinkAbout15, Reject Ash Claim
Action Item July 15, 2015 From Mimi AshReject the Claim# 15
Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 2 TwoPhaseinsection“looped”theofcompletiontheensuretodepositguarantee”“construction000,39$acollectedDistrict•phasestwointodevelopmentthesplittorequestedSteiner)(MarkDev
eloperThe•phaseoneindeveloptowasplanoriginalThe•Creek TownhomesPinyonLLC to construct water infrastructure for the Development Agreement” with Shire Investments, Site Water -2004, the
District entered into an “On•Background / History
3 Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash
New Information Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 4 GroupMetroTheto2014,12NovembersoldwaspropertythethatshowrecordsCountyPlacer•.infrastructuresystemwatertheincludingproperty,CreekPinyontheofdevelopment
theforAshMimi.MsfromConstructionforApplicationanreceivedDistrictthe,2014October•completedbeingsystemwateruponagreedtopriorupon,foreclosedwaspropertythe,2009•
New Information Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 5 AgreementtheinnoticesanyofrecipienttheasdesignatediswhoSteiner,.MrtosentwaslettertheofcopyA− interestinsuccessionhersupporttodocumentationRequested−
Letter”andAgreementtheoftermsthewithaccordanceinguaranteefinancialtheofrefundanyreceivetoentitled“bewouldAshMsbelievesDistrictThe− propertyIIPhaseCreekPinyontheofownertheisshethatunderstandingthewit
h,.IncGroup,MetroTheAsh,Mimi.MstoletterasentDistrictthe,2015,14April•
New Information Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 6 AshMswithagreementsignedahavenotdoesDistrictThe•completedissystemdistributionwater2PhasetheuntilrefundedbenotwoulddepositindicatedBrenner.MsandDistric
tthebetweenCommunications•practical”assoonasmoney“deposittheofreturntherequestingAsh,MsforattorneyBrenner,Barbarafromreceivedwasemailan,2015,13MayOn,•LLCInvestments,Shiretosuccessionherregardingdocum
entationwith2015,5MayaboutoronletterareceivedDistrictThe•
New Information Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 7 completedbeennothasinfrastructureWater− Ash.MswithagreementdevelopmentnewofLack− claimtheofrejectioninitialDistrict’stheofmeeting,2015,15JulyforAgenda
BoardpublicDistrict’stheofemailvianotified,beenhasAsh,Msclaimant,The•pipelinethisofconstructionthetowardusedbetoarefundsdepositedThe•agreementdevelopmentthesigningtopriorclarification,furtherrequiret
hatissuesfewaaretherethatpositionDistrict’stheoutlinesthat2015,14MayonAshMstoletterasentDistrictThe•
Fiscal Impact Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 8 Districtthetoimpactfiscalnoistheredeposit,customeraisthisAs
Recommendation Reject the Claim from Mimi Ash 9 of Rejection of Claim within 10 daysreturn the $39,000 deposit and direct staff to send a Notice The recommendation is to deny the claim
from Ms. Ash to