Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13, draft 2012 water master plan Workshop Item # 13 March 7, 2012 2012 Water Master Plan Review of the Draft 2 Adoption of Water Master Plan requires a CEQA review•Current Water Master Plan adopted in 2004•recommendations regarding Connection Fees and Facility FeesDevelop cost estimates for needed improvements and provide –conditionsIdentify facilities needed to serve future growth up to buildout –improvements to correct those deficiencies Identify any deficiencies with the existing water system and –Document the existing water system–Purpose of Water Master Plan•Background / History Review of the Draft 3 Data sources & other reports–Includes discussion of Hirschdale system–Existing system as of December 31, 2010–Scope of the study–Background & history–Introduction–Section 1 •New Information Review of the Draft 4 Cost estimating criteria–Storage requirements–Pipeline velocity & head loss–System pressures–System Planning Criteria–Section 2 •New Information Review of the Draft 5 Pipelines–Control valve stations–Storage tanks–Pumping stations–Other supply sources–Treatment facilities–Wells–Pressure zones–Brief discussions with summary tables and maps––Section 3 •New Information Review of the Draft 6 Potable Maximum Day Demand = 20.3 mgd–Potable Average Day Demand = 10.1 mgd–Buildout (Year 2038):–Potable Maximum Day Demand = 9.5 mgd–Potable Average Day Demand = 4.5 mgd–2010:–Population & Water Demands–Section 4 •New Information Review of the Draft 7 Scheduled for completion in 2013–New groundwater study underway–feet-District pumped about 5,075 acre–feet-wide withdrawals for year 2010: 7,175 acre-Total basin–yearfeet per -Prior studies determined sustainable yield of 24,000 acre–Groundwater from Martis Valley Groundwater Basin–Water Supplies–Section 5 •New Information Review of the Draft 8 Eight additional wells needed at buildout (850 gpm each)–Firm production capacity: 10.9 mgd–Existing production capacity: 14.0 mgd–Buildout maximum day demand: 20.3 mgd–Year 2010 maximum day demand: 9.5 mgd–Potable Water Production Capacity–Section 5 •New Information Review of the Draft 9 38 recommended improvements––Some additional storage needed–Some areas of inadequate fire flow–Some transmission pipelines are too small–Areas of high and low service pressure–Existing System Evaluation–Section 6 •New Information Review of the Draft 10 Additional pressure reducing stations–Additional pump stations–Additional storage–Additional wells–Second pipeline to Tahoe Donner–Future System Evaluation and Layout–Section 7 •New Information Review of the Draft 11 fundingActual year will vary based upon future growth and available –Assumed year of construction for projects–Total cost of $93 million–$40 million from Facility Fees–$28 million from rates–Construction cost of $68 million–Cost estimates for future projects –Capital Improvement Program–Section 8 •New Information Review of the Draft 25.4%-$1.61/sq. ft.$2.02/sq. ft.$1.64/sq. ft.Residential 5.4%$4,365$4,140$3,358(3/4” meter)Commercial for InflationAdjusted% ChangeFacility FeeProposed InflationAdjusted for Current Fee Facility FeeCurrent Item 12 Minor increase in Connection Fees–Increase Commercial Facility Fees by about 30 percent–$1.61/ square footReduce Residential Facility Fees from $1.64/square foot to –Cost impact of proposed CIP–Financial Impacts–Section 9 •New Information Review of the Draft 13 requirementsAdjustment of Facility Fees is subject to Proposition 218 –Perform CEQA review–Respond to comments from Board and public–Conduct public hearing–Next steps•New Information Review of the Draft 14 Adoption of ordinance to adjust Facility Fees–September 5, 2012 –Public hearing on ordinance to adjust Facility Fees–August 1, 2012 –Adoption of Water Master Plan–July 18, 2012 –CEQA public hearing–June 6, 2012 –Review of CEQA Initial Study–May 2, 2012 –Public hearing on Water Master Plan–April 4, 2012 –Review of draft Water Master Plan (tonight)–March 7, 2012 –Tentative Schedule•New Information Review of the Draft 15 Connection Fees and Facility FeesDraft Water Master Plan recommends adjustment of both •Fiscal Impact Review of the Draft 16 receive comment on the draft Water Master PlanSchedule a public hearing on the for April 4, 2012 to •Provide comment on the draft Water Master Plan•Recommendation