Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8-Consideration of the Purchase of Security CamerasAgenda • T U KEE DONNER F Public Utility District CONSENT To: Board of Directors From: Ian Fitzgerald Date: September 18, 2013 Subject: Consideration of the Purchase of Security Cameras 1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD Board approval is required for expenditures in excess of $15,000. 2. HISTORY The District's goals are to provide a safe, secure business atmosphere for both our customers and employees. On a daily basis, District employees are in direct contact with the public, contractors, and vendors. The District has some physical security measures in place to help ensure the integrity of the office building from external threats. Physical security measures include chain -link fencing, locked gates, extensive lighting and an antiquated video security camera system. A physical security program typically comprises five distinct elements: deterrence, delay, detection, assessment, and communication. In addition to the physical security elements, the District has also built a strong network infrastructure within the main office building. For the past 6 months, the District has run a successful test of our new video surveillance at our Martis Valley Substation. This project demonstrated that the existing infrastructure can handle many high definition cameras, detect intrusion, and record high definition. 3. NEW INFORMATION Surveillance systems can supply the missing elements to our physical security program by providing the means to detect and assess threats to District facilities. In addition to intruder threat detection and assessment, remote surveillance can also play an important role in monitoring personnel and responding to emergency situations. The Federal government competitively bids products and services through the GSA contracts. Local governments, including the District, are eligible to take advantage of GSA pricing per Federal Codes. In addition, District Code Section 3.08 allows for the purchase of goods and services from State and Federal Government competitive bid schedule programs. The proposed remote security equipment includes nine network video cameras to be installed at the District offices. Existing video management software and server hardware is already operational. The cameras will be strategically place to capture all ingress/egress points within the building. The remote security equipment bid from Siemens Industry, Inc., as was the beta test at Martis Valley Substation, containing General Services Administration (GSA) pricing, costs $16,271 plus tax. 4. FISCAL IMPACT Sufficient funds exist within the approved Electric Capital Replacement Fund for this project. 5. RECOMMENDATION Authorize a purchase order to Siemens Industry, Inc. for security equipment and services for $16,271 plus a 10% change order allowance of $1,627 for an amount not to exceed $17,898 plus tax. Stephen Hollabaugh Michael D. Holley Assistant General Manager General Manager