HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-1, Attachment 1 - CMUA SB1 Solar Program Status Report CY 2012 07-01-13_FINALATTACHMENT
California Public Power
SB1 Solar Program
Status Report
July 2013
vN'C jPA S C P P A
KERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
ATTACHMENT
California Public Power S131 Solar Program Status Report
Reporting Period: January through December 2012
BACKGROUND:
California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) was passed by the State Legislature and signed into law by the
Governor on August 21, 2006.
The legislation requires the governing body of local Publicly Owned Utilities (POU) to adopt,
implement and finance a solar initiative program for the purpose of investing in and encouraging
the increased installation of residential and commercial solar energy systems beginning January
1, 2008.
The statewide expenditure cap for programs adopted and implemented by POUs is seven
hundred eighty-four million dollars ($784,000,000). Expenditure levels for each local publicly
owned electric utility are approximately based on the utility's percentage of the total statewide
load served by all local publicly owned electric utilities.
POUs are required to report on an annual basis, beginning June 1, 2008, information relating to
the City's solar initiative program(s), including the number of photovoltaic solar watts installed,
the total number of photovoltaic systems installed, the total number of applicants, the amount of
incentives awarded, and the contribution toward the program goals. Beginning in 2013, annual
reports of the progress are due July 1st. This report is a compilation of a majority of the State's
POUs submitted for the period January through December 2012. Some utilities have already
submitted their report directly to the CEC and a copy of the same report is included herein.
PROGRAM ACTIVITY AND CHALLENGES:
POUs are actively promoting the State's objectives under SB1 via marketing, community
outreach, and working with the installers. The expenditures in 2012 appear to have decreased
overall for most POUs, but there are still several that spent more compared to the prior year.
The decrease in expenditures can be contributed to several factors such as some communities
are still affected by the downturn of the economy, PV installations costs continue to decrease,
funds for the program have run out for that year or the program is temporarily suspended, or no
applications were received. While expenditures was mostly due to a mix of increase in
applications and kW installed along with prior applications from previous years finally having the
units installed, some communities continued to have a strong interest in the rebate program.
Some utilities also received more applications than installations they were able to
accommodate, resulting in a queue. A couple of utilities have exceeded their S131 funding and
continue to receive applications, but their funds have been exhausted. These utilities still
accept applications and assist the customers as much as possible with their installation needs.
Customers are aware when the funds are exhausted or if there is no rebate available, yet for
most, due to the decreasing installation costs, they still proceed with having the work performed.
This indicates that even with no incentives available, customers are still interested in having PV
systems installed.
Many utilities maintained a "funds reserved" amount, which can represent applications received
yet installations have not been completed, or in some cases installations are completed and
incentive funds are to be paid over time in future years. In both cases, the utilities reserve these
funds from the incentives available under the life of the program to enable payments. These
numbers are significant as they illustrate a future commitment. Although, compared to the prior
July 1, 2013 Page 2
ATTACHMENT
California Public Power SB1 Solar Program Status Report
Reporting Period: January through December 2012
year, there are a few utilities that have no reserves allocated and this is due to some reaching
their SB1 funding or budget limitations.
Some utilities are approaching or have already exhausted their program fund commitment. In a
few cases, customers have been notified that the entire program has been subscribed or that
there is an application queue or due to budget limitations the program was being shut down
temporarily. In the latter case, a couple of utilities were able to reopen the program mid -year,
but had to quickly close it again due to the amount of applications and funds available.
Communication of this activity varies between utilities; but the general message to the
consumer is the local program is "closed" either entirely or until a future date when they may
again begin accepting applications. Depending on the robustness of the program response,
some utilities included a cap amount by sector and allocated a set time period for applications to
help control the influx of applications. This activity reflects the localized nature of development
and saturation of solar programs among the POU service territories.
Solar installations, even with an incentive contribution by the local utility, and panel prices
dropping, are still expensive especially for the areas deeply affected by the downturn of the
economy as customers still need to pay a portion of the installations. Some installers are
offering leasing or power purchase agreement options to help offset some of the costs, which
has helped in some areas, but not in all regions. The general downturn in the States' economy
is still preventing some customers from applying for the rebates. While in other communities,
some customers chose to install PV systems without the rebate program as they viewed it as an
energy savings.
However, some localized increases in participation are being observed in a couple of POU
territories that previously had zero applications. Much of this is driven by the more organized
development of installations upon commercial, industrial, and other buildings with large open -
space roof opportunities. These installations are often driven by developers or contractors who
approach building owners with a combination of services including financing, lease -back, and
other unique structures to incent participation. In addition to the decrease in PV installation
costs, increased marketing of the rebate program and continual relationship development
between the contractors and the utilities has contributed to more activity. In some cases,
developers and contractors have other tax incentives that they bring forth when approaching the
customer in addition to the utilities' rebate program.
As shown in the individual S131 annual reports, the POUs are doing their best efforts to meet the
goals of the SB1 legislation, whereas some have already exceeded or met their goals, these
utilities continue to assist customers with their installation needs even without a rebate
incentive.
In response to the required annual reporting, following the summary table are the individual SB1
Solar Program Status Reports.
July 1, 2013 Page 3
ATTACHMENT
California Public Power S131 Solar Program Status Report
Reporting Period: January through December 2012
This report contains information for POUs as summarized in the following table:
Total of
Reserved
kW
funding for future
Applicants
Installations
installed
Expenditures
year payments
Alameda
55
52
1,008.5
$564,983
$3,726,916
Anaheim
101
160
1,137.0
$4,498,545
$14,373,899
Azusa
44
44
164.3
$436,015
$765,490
Banning
8
8
84.0
$268,993
$0
Biggs
0
0
0
$9,525
$0
Burbank
11
11
79.4
$975,876
$1,496,000
Cerritos
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Colton
0
0
373.8
$0
$0
Corona
0
0
0
$0
$0
Glendale
75
67
1,426.5
$1,500,000
$474,305
Gridley
0
1
6.8
$9,875
$0
Healdsburg
6
6
92.0
$70,377
$49,280
IID
70
87
2,473.5
$2,577,688
$3,965,051
Industry
Lassen
0
0
0
$0
$140,000
Lodi
14
23
206.0
$460,193
$2,697,767
Lompoc
12
12
42.6
$153,936
$250,000
Los Angeles (LADWP)
3,721
2,372
21,635.0
$154,381,278
$85,024,790
Merced
12
12
223.8
$528,632
$0
Modesto
77
75
1,213.0
$4,450,164
$16,126,685
Moreno Valley
16
9
801.0
$178,655
$0
Needles
5
5
33.8
$68,573
$0
Palo Alto
49
40
204.1
$1,051,966
$2,160,778
July 1, 2013 Page 4
ATTACHMENT
California Public Power SB1 Solar Program Status Report
Reporting Period: January through December 2012
Total of
Reserved
kW
funding for future
Applicants
Installations
installed
Expenditures
year payments
Pasadena
114
98
925.0
$3,032,441
$10,047,801
Pittsburgh Power (Island Energy)
6
4
126.1
$25,500
$28,000
Plumas Sierra (COOP)
23
23
122.0
$218,665
$6,000
Port of Oakland
1
1
250.0
$0
$0
Rancho Cucamonga
2
0
0
$38,052
$38,052
Redding
0
11
881.0
$1,015,859
$6,427,650
Riverside
195
181
1,038.1
$2,585,751
$1,274,817
Roseville
91
91
905.0
$463,887
$562,953
Sacramento (SMUD)
1,378
1,131
11,870.0
$55,206,673
$122,968,520
San Francisco
**
**
**
**
**
Shasta Lake
7
3
42.1
$97,047
$47,832
Silicon Valley Power
39
63
2,227.0
$2,921,561
$18,450,225
Trinity
0
0
0
$0
$0
Truckee Donner
9
8
25.7
$27,345
$69,019
Turlock (TID)
203
41
1,744.4
$1,330,291
$17,010,358
Ukiah
2
4
20.1
$39,010
$0
Vernon
2
1
30.0
$0
$0
Victorville
0
0
0
$0
$0
Totals:
6,348
4,637
51,412
$ 239,187,356
$ 308,182,188
Notes:
* means that information was not available at time of publication or may have been submitted to the CEC directly
** means the POU has already submitted or plans to submit directly to the CEC
July 1, 2013 Page 5
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Alameda Municipal Power
Contact Person: Alan Hanger
Email Address: hanger@alamedamp.com
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: A large Commercial project replaced 13 Commercial projects that
cancelled in 2012. Two large commercial PBI projects will complete
AMP's Commercial availability through 2017.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Commercial projects are fully reserved through 2017 and as of April
2013, all Residential projects have been reserved through 2017.
Unless projects cancel, AMP's SB 1 program is fully reserved through
2017.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
51
38
13
PBI
1 41
4
0
Total
1 551
421
13
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
38
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier 11
4
Total (of all sectors)
42
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
46
146.678
284,439
$ 482,877
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
0
-
0
0
Commercial
6
861.856
1,357,286
$ 82,106
Non -Profit
0
-
0
0
Government
01
1 0
0
Industrial
0
0
0
Agricultural
0
0
0
Mixed -Use
0
0
0
Total (of all sectors)
521
1,008.534
1,641,725
$ 564,983
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 564,983
$ 564,983
$3,726,916
$4,200,000
$473,084
2,127 kW
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: 13 EPBI rebate commercial
applications withdrawn.
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: Verified that installation is correct and operating properly when the
solar meter is set. AMP requires two meters.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.alamedamp.com/power/solar-rebates-
resid http://www.alamedamp.com/power/solar-
rebates-coml
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Anaheim Public Utilities
Contact Person: Mark Brownrigg
Email Address: Mbrownrigg@anaheim.net
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Solar rebate program for residential and commercial properties.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
90
68
22
PBI
11
7
4
Total
1 1011
75
26
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
74
New Construction Tier 1
1
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
75
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
146
790
1,011,911
2,348,271
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
7
40
22,678
100,500
Commercial
7
307
397,800
488,281
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
160
1137
1,432,389
2,937,052
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$4,498,545
3,477,0521
14,373,8991
35,055,8001
20,681,901
12 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: Due to the economy, some customers have not
proceeded with installing their solar PV system even after being approved for a rebate.
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Annual Solar Information Session for residents held in October 2012;
Information Session for installers held in December 2012.
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes, randomly 10% of the systems were audited by a private third party
contractor.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=1644
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Azusa Light and Water
Contact Person: Paul Reid
Email Address: preid@ci.azusa.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: 1-1-12 to 12-31-12
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: 44 new systems were installed during the 2012 calendar year, as
compared to 7 during 2011.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: There is currently a waiting list for residential, commercial and
industrial systems.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
44
44
PBI
Total
441
44
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
44
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
44
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
43
100.9
257,692
$ 261,665
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
1
63.4
162,000
$ 174,350
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
44
164.3
419,692
$ 436,015
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 436,015
$ 436,015
$ 765,490
$ 3,271,000
$ 2,275,266
3000/3
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: All systems internally pre and post inspected.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.ci.azusa.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=565
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Banning
Contact Person: Veronica Craghead
Email Address: vcraghead@ci.banning.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Due to Banning's aggressive marketing of its Solar PV Rebate Program, it met
and exceeded its SB1 rebate requirements in 2010. As a result Solar PV rebate funds are exhausted and the
program has been temporarily suspended pending allocation of additional funding.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: As PV installation costs continue to decrease, Banning continues to
receive Interconnection Agreements from customers wishing to install PV systems, although there are no
rebates available.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
PBI
8
8
Total
81
8
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
7
35
55,077
252,978
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
1
49
79,542
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
8
84
134,619
252,978
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
268,993
252,9781
None
1 1,965,123
None
n/a
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: None
Solar program information on website at: http://ca-banning.civicplus.com/index.aspx?NID=300
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Biggs Municipal Utilities
Contact Person: Marlee Mattos
Email Address: marlee@biggs-ca.gov
Program Reporting Period: 01/01/12 to 12/31/12
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Continued to work with homeowners, contractors, commercial & industrial
customers to promote our Solar PV Incentive Program. Met with several solar contractors to educate them on
program parameters & opportunities.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Attracting electric customers with the funds to invest in solar PV. In a
poor community, it's challenging.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
I
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
0
0
0
Total
I 0
I 0
I 0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
0
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
0
0
0
0
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
01
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$9,525.00
$7,800.00
$0.00
$181,153.00
$134,791.62
161
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed:
None
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
None
Any auditing of installed systems: None
Solar program information on website at:
www.biggs-ca.gov
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report ATTACHMENT 1
Utility Name: Burbank Water and Power
Contact Person: John Joyce
Email Address: jloyce@burbankca.gov
Program Reporting Period: CY 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Due to ongoing PBI payments overlapping, the remaining program budget was
exhausted quickly in 2012.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Due to decreasing solar costs, many BWP customers have elected to
installs stems without an incentive. The program will reopen in July 2013.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
11
11
0
PBI
101
01
0
Total
Iill
11
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
10
New Construction Tier 1
1
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
11
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
9
43.4
72,500
$55,548
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
1
25.78
41,810
$24,277
Non -Profit
1
11.26
18,272
$10,610
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
11I
79.36
132,582
$90,435
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$975,876
$954,7861
$1,496,000
up to $15 million
1 $6,193,336
N/A*
Additional
Information (as available)
* Note: BWP adopted a budgetary goal, not a kW goal.
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Phone and email support available from program manager and additional
office staff.
Any auditing of installed systems: All systems given incentives were audited by BWP third party consultant
Solar program information on website at: http://www.burbankwaterandpower.com/incentives-for-all-customers/solar-
photovoltaic-power
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Colton Public Utilities
Contact Person: Jessica Sutorus
Email Address: jsutorus@ci.colton.ca.us
Program Reporting Period:
January 2012 through December 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
The City of Colton Public Utilities solar program was fully subscribed
for the reporting year of January 2012 through December 2012.
During the year, five residential customers and one industrial
customer installed PV systems without receiving a rebate since no
funds were available. For the reporting year of January 2013 through
December of 2013 we will continue our rebate program until funding
is subscribed. A waiting list has been established with our first priority
customers.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Opportunities: The City of Colton will resume the solar rebate
program with its new allocation of funds for the 2013 fiscal year. To
ensure program success, the City of Colton will modify program
requirements when needed and continue install verifications.
Challenges: The demand for PV installation could be higher as a
result of full subscription from the previous year.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
0
0
0
Total
1 01
0
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
I 0
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
5
31.75
47,402
0
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
1
342
5,458,425
0
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
6
373.75
5,505,827
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
$ 2,781,107.41
$0
1 $4,276,125.00
$1,218,892.59
14 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: An applicant exceeded his
timeline to apply and funding
was no longer available.
Non PV solar systems installed:
None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems:
All systems are inspected before interconnection. All production
meters are read on a regular basis.
Solar program information on website at: www.coltononline.com
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Corona Dept of Water&Power
Contact Person: Michael TenEyck
Email Address: Michael.TenEyck@ci.corona.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Offered an incentive of $1.53 per watt up to 3kW for residential customers
($4,590) and 25kW for non-residential customers ($38,250).
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
01
01
0
Total
01
01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier 11
0
Total (of all sectors)
I 0
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
0
0
$2,118,000
$2,118,000
1.89 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: N/A
Non PV solar systems installed: 0
Any training or builder/installer assistance: N/A
Any auditing of installed systems: N/A
Solar program information on website at: www.discovercorona.com/City
Departments/Department of Water &
Power/Conservation/Residential Rebates/Solar
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Glendale Water & Power
Contact Person: Hector Gutierrez
Email Address: Hgutierrez@ci.glendale.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: 2012 Calendar Year
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: During the period between January 2012 and December 2012, Glendale Water &
Power provided rebates to 67 (including 6 PBI) applicants representing 399.4 kW of installed capacity and
approximately 1,041,472 kWh in generation. Total installations are: 47 residential, 6 affordable housing, 11
commercial and 3 Non-profit, for a total of 1,426.47 kW and 2,698,802 annual kWh generation. In addition GWP
received 63 applications which were put on the waiting list for processing next fiscal year. GWP continues to receive
a high volume of calls from interested customers. This PV program is well known in the community, both by the
customers as well as vendors.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: During this period 2 additional PBI applicants were added to the program
bringing the total to 6. That means that funding for this group is 100% reserved for next five years. The rebate
amounts have also changed per program guidelines, they are currently: $1.86/watt for residential, $0.21/kWh for
commercial and $2.33/watt for affordable housing customers.
Program Performance
Total Apps
Number of Rejected/
Apps Rcvd Apps Approved Cancelled
EPBI 1 75 61 10
PBI 1 01 011 0
Total 1 751 611 10
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings 61
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors) 61
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Total Systems
Installed Capacity
Total
Incentives Paid
Category Type
Installed
(kW)
Generation
for Reporting
(kWh/yr)
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
47
221.55
395,031
$463,634
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
6
26.45
149,904
$126,662
Commercial
11
556.05
1,219,936
$435,399
Non -Profit
3
622.42
933,931
0
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
67
1,426.47
2,698,802
$1,025,695
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Incentives
SB 1 Funding
Funds
kW/MW Goal
Paid/Reporting
Reserved
(Life of Program)
Remaining
(Life of Program)
Year
$1,500,000
$1,025,695
474,3051
$15,200,000
$8,442,763
17,000
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: Expired Reservations
Non PV solar systems installed: N/A
Any training or builder/installer assistance: N/A
Any auditing of installed systems: YES
Solar program information on website at: http://www.glendalewaterandpower.com/save mon
e solar ro ram residential.as x
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
ATTACHMENT
Utility Name: City of Gridley
Contact Person: Jim Brands
Email Address: jim@esgroupllc.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
No new applications were received during CY2012. One (1) solar PV system was
installed in the City's service territory and rebated under the PV Buy Down Program
during CY2012 (same as CY2011).
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Gridley has continued to be hit hard by the current economic downturn. Many
residents are unemployed/underemployed and cannot afford to make an investment
in a solar system for their home or business. An improved economy provides the best
hope for an uptick in customer interest.
Program Performance
Tota I
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
Total
01
01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
1
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
1
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
1
6.82
11,358.00
$5,600.00
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
1
6.82
11,358.00
$5,600.00
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal (Life of
Program)
$9,874.96
$5,600.001
$0.00
$435,000.00
$411,125.04
N/A
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: none
Non PV solar systems installed:
none
Any training or builder/installer assistance: There was no additional training or special assistance provided to
builders or installers during CY2012.
Any auditing of installed systems:
All sites are subject to an energy audit prior to reservation of SB1 funds and 100% of
systems are inspected by a third -party (post -installation) to verify that the system
performance matches the EPBB inputs.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.gridley.ca.us/sites/default/files/files/Documents/electr
ic-department
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Healdsburg
Contact Person: Terry Crowley
Email Address: tcrowley@ci.healdsburg.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - thru. December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: There were a total of 6 installations installed in calendar year 2012.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Interest and participation has fallen significantly.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
6
6
0
PBI
Total
I 6
6
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
6
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
6
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
3
16.1
31,028
$ 12,805.00
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
3
75.63
145,754
$ 48,392.20
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
6
92
176,782
61,197
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$70,376.78
$61,197.20
$ 49,280.00
$1,081,000.001
$346,960.79
n/a
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: none
Non PV solar systems installed: none
Any training or builder/installer assistance: none
Any auditing of installed systems: not in CY2012
Solar program information on website at: yes, www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us/solar
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Imperial Irrigation District
Contact Person: Andrea Miramontes
Email Address: aamiramontes@iid.com
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Imperial Irrigation District offers rebates to residential and non-residential customers
that install qualifying photovoltaic generation systems. During this reporting period, IID paid out one Performance
Based Incentive (PBI) application under the 2010 program budget ($0.23/kWh) and four PBI applications under the 2011
program budget ($0.24/kWh). IID paid out one Expected Performance Based Incentive (EPBI) application under the 2010
program budget ($2.60/W), forty-five applications under the 2011 program budget ($2.42/W), and thirty-six applications
under the 2012 program budget ($2.09). IID maintained the system size cap of 15 kW (residential), 300 kW
(commercial), and 400 kW (government/non-profits) set in 2010 to allow for an increased number of participants. The
district promotes the PV/Solar Solutions program through a variety of channels including our website, community
events and workshops.
Future Opportunities: Imperial Irrigation District continues to make changes to ensure program success. These changes
include modifications to program requirements, rebate caps and verification of installed equipment. The IID's program
guidelines comply with S61 mandates and are consistent with the CEC's Guidelines for California Solar Electric Incentive
Programs.
Challenges: There continued to be a high demand for this program resulting in full subscription. IID distributed the
2012 funds differently than previous years; 35%for residential, 15%government/non-profits, and 50% commercial. IID
designated one week for application submittals and each sector had a designated day (one for government/non-profits
and two for residential and commercial). IID was able to fund all residential and government/non-profits who
submitted during the submittal period, but the commercial sector generated a waiting list. Several applications were
submitted after the deadline and were put on a waiting list.
Program
*IID has a high demand for this program resulting in a
Total
Apps
waiting list for both EPBI and PBI.
Number of
Rejected/
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Cancelled
EPBI
56
44
12
PBI
14
13
1
Total
1 701
57
13
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
86
New Construction Tier 1
1
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
87
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Incentives Paid
Total Systems
Installed Capacity
Total Generation
for Reporting
Category Type
Installed
(kW)
(kWh/yr)
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
79
705.08
1,287,736
$ 1,442,535
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
6
1151.22
2,165,287
$ 457,365
Non -Profit
Government
2
617.24
1,206,114
$ 260,000
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
87
2473.54
4,659,137
$ 2,159,900
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Incentives
SIB1 Funding
rFunds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
Paid/Reporting Year
Reserved
(Life of Program)
(Life of Program)
$ 2,577,688
$ 2,159,900
$ 3,965,051
$ 40,219,80927,899,252
44 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: A total of 12 residential applications were cancelled;
five were due to financial constraints, two due to HOA complexity, four due to missed PV/Solar Solutions deadlines and
one due to cost of upgrades needed on the structure. One commercial application was cancelled at the customer's
request due to the cost of upgrades at the facility.
Non PV solar systems installed: One commercial site installed a Concentrating Photovoltaic (CPV) system -318 kW.
Any training or builder/installer assistance: IID held four workshops (two in Imperial Valley, two in Riverside County) to
inform the ratepayers and contractors of 2012 changes to SB1 guidelines and submittal process.
Any auditing of installed systems: Inspections of installed systems performed at the time system is energized (100%).
Solar program information on website at: www.iid.com/solar
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Lassen MUD
Contact Person: Theresa Phillips
Email Address: tphillips@lmud.org
Program Reporting Period: 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Lassen did not receive any solar applications in 2012.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
0
0
0
Total
1 01
01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
0
0
0
0
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
0
0
0
0
Commercial
0
0
0
0
Non -Profit
0
0
0
0
Government
0
0
0
0
Industrial
0
0
0
0
Agricultural
0
0
0
0
Mixed -Use
01
0
0
0
Total (of all sectors)
01
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
0
140,000
1,400,0001
1,107,0001
1.4
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None conducted in 2012
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes
Solar program information on website at: www.imud.org
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Lodi Electric Utility
Contact Person: Rob Lechner
Email Address: rlechner@lodi.gov
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
All rebate funds allocated for calendar year 2012 were exhausted;
program marketing included: newspaper advertisements and utility bill
inserts.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Lodi Electric Utility anticipates continued excellent customer
participation in the program years ahead; no challenges identified.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
14
14
0
PBI
Total
1 141
14
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
23
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
23
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
17
77
138,600
$ 61,157
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
5
73
131,400
$ 162,059
Non -Profit
Government
1
56
100,800
0
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
annual payment
for previously
installed sys.
1 $ 236,977
Total (of all sectors)
23
206
370,800
$ 460,193
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 460,193
$ 460,193
$ 2,697,767
$ 6,100,000
$ 3,402,233
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None.
Non PV solar systems installed:
None.
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None.
Any auditing of installed systems:
All systems are pre- and post -inspected by the utility.
Solar program information on website at:
www.lodielectric.com
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Lompoc
Contact Person: Mary Kammer
Email Address: m kammer@ci.lompoc.ca.us
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
Rebates are offered to all utility customers that are project owners.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
12
12
PBI
Total
1 121
12
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
12
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
12
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
12
42.602
67,587
103,936.00
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
50,000
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
12
42.602
67,587
153,936.00
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 153,936.00
$ 153,936.00
$ 250,000.00
$1,746,260.00
$ 1,074,268
n/a
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
Non PV solar systems installed:
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
Any auditing of installed systems:
At least one in seven systems are audited for installed compliance. All
systems are system verified by staff.
Solar program information on website at:
Yes,
http://www.cityoflompoc.com/utilities/conservation/
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Los Angeles Department of Water
Contact Persons: Kenneth Pritchett/Megan Yazdi
Email Addresses: Kenneth.Pritchett@ladwp.com
and Power
Mozhgan.Yazdi@ladwp.com
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Summary of Program Activities:
The LADWP Solar Incentive Program (SIP) received an average of 310 solar incentive applications a month in 2012,
compared to 250 a month in 2011. The majority of applications received were for residential retrofit projects as
the SIP was closed to non-residential applicants for most of the year. LADWP facilitated the interconnection of
21.6 MegaWatts (MW) of solar energy systems in 2012, equating to approximately 36 GigaWatthours of solar
energy generation, bringing the total customer -owned solar capacity on the LADWP grid to 64 MW as of
December 31, 2012. Approximately $41.7M in incentives were paid in 2012, raising total program expenditures for
incentives to $138M.
LADWP budgets $288M for incentive payments and $25M for administration and outreach. Funding for incentive
payments is divided evenly between residential and non-residential customers. As of June 2013, approximately
$45M remains for residential customers and $15M for non-residential customers. LADWP limits fiscal year
reservations for residential and non-residential applicants to $20M each. In February 2012, LADWP suspended the
non-residential incentive program after reaching $20M in fiscal year confirmations. In July 2012, LADWP reopened
the non-residential incentive program and received $20M worth of requests within the first 20 minutes of the
reopening. The program was resuspended in August 2012 after the confirmation of $20M of non-residential
incentive applications. The non-residential program will reopen for the last time in July 2013 with approximately
$15M worth of funding.
On June 19, 2013, the LADWP Board of Water and Power Commissioners approved a set of major changes to the
SIP to be effective July 15, 2013, which include streamlining measures and reductions to the incentive level offered
to customers who transfer ownership of the Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to LADWP. The California Energy
Commission (CEC) recently adopted RPS Enforcement Procedures that adversely affect the value of RECs acquired
through the SIP. The CEC has declared that RECs acquired through the SIP are classified as Portfolio Content
Category 3, which are worth significantly less than RECs classified as Portfolio Content Category 1. Thus, LADWP
has adjusted the additional REC incentive available for customers from $0.40/W to $0.05/W.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Accommodating the growing demand for residential solar incentives continues to be a challenging task for
LADWP. LADWP has made great strides by transitioning the SIP to PowerClerk, a web -based solar application tool,
but there is still room for improvements across the various stages of the incentive process. The influx of the
numerous solar leasing entities in Los Angeles has significantly increased customer interest in solar. Approximately
70% of solar incentive applications received in 2012 were for leased solar systems. Providing an acceptable
turnaround time for reservation reviews, solar inspections, and payment processing with the increasing demand
for solar will be a challenging but absolutely necessary task for LADWP.
Furthermore, 2013 will be the last year LADWP offers incentives to non-residential applicants. LADWP is observing
a growing trend of non-residential customers installing solar in LADWP's service territory without the incentive,
demonstrating that the installation of non-residential solar is cost-effective without the utility rebate. The next
challenge for LADWP is to develop a program to facilitate the interconnection of non-residential solar installations
without the rebate.
ATTACHMENT
Program Performance
Total
Number
Apps
of Apps
Rejected/
Rcvd
Apps Approved
Cancelled
EPBI
3721
3453
301
PBI
0
0
0
Total
1 37211
34531
301
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
2269
New Construction\Major Renovation
103
Total (of all sectors)
2372
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Total Systems
Installed Capacity
Total Generation
Incentives Paid
Category Type
Installed
(kW)
(kWh/yr)
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
2292
10,888
17,965,910
$ 16,546,461
Residential - Affordable/ Low IncomE
6
165
272,407
$ 422,126
Commercial
52
5,425
8,951,729
$ 11,377,101
Non -Profit
10
686
1,131,125
$ 1,936,923
Government
12
4,470
7,375,967
$ 12,067,309
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
2,372
21,635
35,697,137
$ 42,349,920
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Incentives
SB 1 Funding
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
Paid/Reporting
Reserved
(Life of Program)
(Life of Program)
Year
$ 154,381,278
$ 41,547,921
$ 85,024,790
$ 313,000,000
$ 73,593,932
280 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
Most cancellations and rejections are due to incompleteness and failure to submit required documentation.
Approximately 7% of the applications submitted in 2012 were cancelled or rejected.
Non PV solar systems installed:
None
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
LADWP does not offer any formal training for solar installers/builders on solar technology or installation. However,
reference documentation is available on the LADWP solar website (www.ladwp.com/solar) which provides solar
installation tips, common mistakes/violations found on solar installations, and sample solar electrical drawings.
No formal training or education is offered by LADWP to solar installers or builders. LADWP does support education
and training through the local Community College District and Electrical Training Institute of Southern California.
Any auditing of installed systems:
Every solar installation within the City of Los Angeles is inspected by both the Los Angeles Department of Building
and Safety and LADWP. These inspections verify compliance with local regulations and LADWP Electric Service
Requirements, and determine the final incentive payment.
Solar program information on website at:
www.ladwp.com/solar
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Contact Person: VANESSA LARA
Email Address: VLARA@MERCEDID.ORG
Program Reporting Period: 1ANUARY 1, 2012 - DECEMBER 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Outreach at several community events. Installers have created
marketing materials to promote our programs.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: The cost of systems has declined and more customers are inquiring
about our program. We have found that working closely with
installers from the beginning helps the installation go more smoothly
and helps with anticipated customer issues.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
12
12
0
PBI
Total
121
12
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
12
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
12
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
7
78.9
146,000
$ 181,712.00
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
0
0
-
$ -
Commercial
3
92.9
141,700
$ 206,920.00
Non -Profit
0
0
$ -
Government
1
26
49,000
$ 70,000.00
Industrial
1
26
42,000
$ 70,000.00
Agricultural
0
0
$ -
Mixed -Use
0
0
$ -
Total (of all sectors)
12
223.8
378,700
$ 528,632.00
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 528,632.00
$ 528,632.00
0
$450,000/yr.
$450,000/yr.
4.7 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: All
applications ultimately approved. However, some issues with initial
submittal due to incomplete single line diagrams.
Non PV solar systems installed: n/a
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Direct one-on-one interaction with installers to explain
Buydown program, application submittal requirements,
net -metering billing issues.
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes. Informal reviews.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.mercedid.org/index.cfm/power/solar/
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Modesto Irrigation District
Contact Person: Mike 2weifel
Email Address: mikez@mid.org
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: MID PV Program participation remained steady and strong in 2012
despite a difficult local economy.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Several vendor/contractors are offering lease/PPA PV options for
our customers, which is increasing workloads and requiring MID to
revise documentation and application processing procedures.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
68
68
0
PBI
91
7
2
Total
771
75
2
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
71
New Construction Tier 1
6
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
77
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed
Capacity (kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
57
306
531,627
$428,933
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
1
119
211,863
$28,178
Commercial
15
697
1,419,874
$378,590
Non -Profit
0
0
0
0
Government
0
0
0
0
Industrial
0
0
0
0
Agricultural
2
91
161,884
$48,172
Mixed -Use
0
0
0
0
Total (of all sectors)
75
1213
2,325,248
$883,873
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of
Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$4,450,164
$4,324,593
$16,126,685
$31,805,682
30 MW
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
Some applications did not turn into projects due to financing or customer
reconsideration of PV as an investment. MID denied 2 agricultural
applications, due to not meeting program guidelines.
Non PV solar systems installed: Not applicable/tracked. MID is an electric utility. Most water
heating in our area is from NG provided by PG&E.
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Not at this time
Any auditing of installed systems: All PV installations are physically inspected to insure compliance of
program rules and guidelines. In addition, MID requires generation
meters on all installation and monitors system performance.
Solar program information on website at: http://www.mid.org/rebates/solar/default.html
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Moreno Valley Electric Utility(MVU)
Contact Person: Michelle Pierce
Email Address: michellep@moval.org
Program Reporting Period: January - December 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: EPBB rate of $2.25/watt, PBI rate $0.06/kWh
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Looking to expand to possible low income program and new home program.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
15
15
0
PBI
1
1
0
Total
1 161
161
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
9
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
9
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
7
37
65,213
$93,232.90
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
0
0
0
0
Commercial
2
764
1,243,854
$84,000
Non -Profit
0
0
0
0
Government
0
0
0
0
Industrial
0
0
0
0
Agricultural
0
0
0
0
Mixed -Use
1 01
01
01
0
Total (of all sectors)
9
801
1,309,067
$177,232.90
Total Expenditures Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$178,654.90 $177,232.90
0
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
Non PV solar systems installed:
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
Any auditing of installed systems:
Solar program information on website at: www.moval.org
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: CITY OF NEEDLES
Contact Person: DAVID G BROWNLEE JR
Email Address: ndlscityprolect@citlink.net
Program Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 - 12/31/2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Provide rebate incentives to residents desiring to install solar PV.
Future Opportunities and Challenges Lack of credit or disposable income to support investment.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
5
5
0
PBI
51
51
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
5
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
1 5
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
5
33.81
296,176
$68,572.90
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
51
33.81
296,176
$68,572.90
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$68,572.90
$68,572.90
None
$500,000
$250,000
2% of non-
renewable energy
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes
Solar program information on website at: No
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: City of Palo Alto Utilities
Contact Person: Lindsay Joye
Email Address: pvpartners@cityofpaloalto.org
Program Reporting Period: 1/1/12-12/31/12
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Residential rebates dropped to step 11 ($1.00/watt). CPAU hosted two
residential workshops, met with many commercial customers and ran
various promotional pieces in local publications and online.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Utilities is working with the Palo Alto Building Officials to offer
expedited permitting for residential systems. Hosted 2 residential PV
workshops.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
47
47
1
PBI
i 21
2
Total
I 491
491
1
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
29
New Construction Tier 1
11
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
1 40
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
37
166.4
257,280
$ 195,864
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
2
33.2
58,247
$ 81,357
Non -Profit
1
4.4
7,141
$ 34,554
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
40
204.1
322,668
$ 311,775
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 1,051,966
$ 915,065
$ 2,160,778
$ 13,000,000
$ 5,929,087
6.5 MW
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: Fewer incomplete applications due to use of
PowerClerk rebate application system.
Non PV solar systems installed: 3 solar water heating systems were installed in 2012
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Ongoing assistance provided for rebate application and
permitting support.
Any auditing of installed systems: 14 PV installations had an additional program inspection (35%
inspection rate)
Solar program information on website at: www.citvofpaloalto.org/pvpartners
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Pasadena Water and Power
lContact Person: Mauricio Mejia
Email Address: mmeiia@citvofpasadena.net
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Interest in solar power continues to be very strong in our service territory
especially in the residential sector. More than half of residential installations
are using the lease option. PWP saw an increase interest in solar from the
affordable housing sector.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: PWP may switch to an online application process in 2013 to improve
communication and project status with installers. Dealing with new
installers, who are slow to learn the Pasadena Solar Initiative ("PSI")
application process, demands excessive time and attention from PSI staff.
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Program
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
Performanc
EPBI
113
109
4
PBI
1
1
Total
1 1141
110
4
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
1 98
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
98
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
86
404
638,531
$ 725,686
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
2
49
75,933
$ 188,300
Commercial
5
331
591,899
$ 39,041
Non -Profit
5
141
242,999
$ 107,895
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
98
925
1,549,362
1,060,922
Total Expenditures (1)
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year (2)
Incentives
Reserved (3)
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
(4)
Funds
Remaining (5)
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 3,032,441
$ 2,828,484
$ 10,047,801
$ 16,000,000
$ (2,694,002)
14,000 kW
Additional Information (as av
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: Customer changes his/her mind
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Assistance to installers are provided over the phone via PWP's
Program Answerline at 626.744.6970
Any auditing of installed systems: PWP program staff inspected 100% of solar installations.
Solar program information on website at: www.PWPweb.com/solar
(1) "Total Expenditures" includes a) "Incentives Paid" plus b) nonincentives (program administration, implementation
and marketing costs)
(2) "Incentives Paid" includes all EPBB incentives plus PBI incentive installment payments paid to customers in
CY2012 (does not include any past or future PBI obligations).
(3) "Incentives Reserved" includes unpaid amounts for a) approved EPBB reservations ($614,000), and b) estimated
PBI incentive payments for future PBI payments ($9,433,801 for both "Installed Capacity" systems reported above plus
remaining installments on systems installed in previous years).
(4) "SB1 Funding" represents PW P's prorata share of the legislated statewide program funding goal. City Council has
authorized spending above this level to meet PW P's capacity goals.
(5) "Funds Remaining" is calculated by deducting a) all program expenditures (incentives and nonincentives) for
calendar years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 ($8,646,201) and b) "Incentives Reserved" ($9,433,801) from the
"SB1 Funding ($16,000,000)". PWP has exceeded the minimum SB1 requirement and continues to fund the PSI
program in excess of $2 million.
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Pittsburg Power Company dba Island Energy
Contact Person: Vanessa Xie
Email Address: vxie@ci.pittsburg.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 1012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Residential & Commercial Solar PV System
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
6
4
2
PBI
Total
I 61
4
2
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
4
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
4
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
3
11.074
19,401
$ 20,375.65
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
1
115
201,830
$0
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
4
126.074
221,231
$ 20,375.65
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 25,500.00
$ 20,375.65
$ 28,000.00
$ 120,000.00
1 $ 87,000.00
1250 KW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: 1
Non PV solar systems installed: 0
Any training or builder/installer assistance: No
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes. City Inspection and Utility Inspection.
Solar program information on website at: www.islandenergy.com
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report ATTACHMENT 1
Utility Name: Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
Contact Person: Corby Gardner
Email Address: cgardner@psrec.coop
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Provided rebates and educational information to encourage PV
installation.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: PSREC is pursuing a community solar installation.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
23
23
0
PBI
Total
23
23
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
23
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
23
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
23
122.03
214,655
123,385
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
23
122.03
214,655
123,385
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
218,665
123,3851
6,0001
2,060,000
N/A
N/A
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: N/A
Non PV solar systems installed: N/A
Any training or builder/installer assistance: N/A
Any auditing of installed systems: Verification of each system is completed during meter replacement. Energy
audit surveys are also required with the application.
Solar program information on website at: www.psrec.coop NOTE: PSREC is an electric cooperative. This report is
provided voluntarily to comply with the intent of S131.
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Port of Oakland
Contact Person: Anthony Kekulawela
Email Address: akekulawela@portoakland.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
Port has an attractive SB 1 (solar) rebate program. However, the electric customers
have not taken advantage of Port's rebate program. On December 12, 2012, we
received an application from FAA for the solar rebate. They have installed a 250 KW
system. The total AC output of the system is 211,191 Watts. They are requesting a
$639,908.73 rebate (this is based on our 2010 rebate rates for PV). FAA still haven't
connected to our grid yet. We are expecting them to come on line after we sign the
Interconnection Agreement before August of 2013. Since they completed their
construction in 2012, the maximum they would be entitled to is $553,320.42 (this is
based on our 2012 rebate for PV).
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Since Port's customer base is 100% commercial, their interest is to promote their
business interest instead of energy savings during these economic hard times.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
1
0
0
PBI
1 01
01
0
Total
1 1
1 01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier 11
0
Total (of all sectors)
0
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
1
250
See Program Activities
See Program Activities
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
11
250
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
01
0
$ 1,030,000
$ 1,030,000
N/A
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications
not approved:
Non PV solar systems installed:
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
Any auditing of installed systems:
Solar program information on website at:
http://www.portofoakland.com/environm/programs.asp
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
1contact Person: Trina Valdez
Email Address: Trina.Valdez@CityofRC.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Two customer applications were received and approved in 2012 with
installation being completed in early 2013.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Rebate rates remained the same for 2013 to encourage customer
participation.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
2
2
0
PBI
0
0
0
Total
1 21
21
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
0
Systems Installed
and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
0i
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$38,052
0
$38,052
$1,250,000
$1,116,108.99
1,190kW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: Secondary meters are installed to capture total system generation.
Audits are performed after a full year of data has been recorded.
Solar program information on website at: https://www.citVofrc.us/cityhall/engineering/rcmu/r
ebates.as
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Redding Electric Utility
Contact Person: Mike Adams
Email Address: madams@reupower.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 01, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
REU's Solar Rebate Program was suspended for the 2012 calendar year
and only Performance Based Incentive (PBI) projects were paid out.
Interconnection requests for PV projects continued despite rebates
not being available from REU.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
REU may re -institute PV rebates in early 2014, with possible size
limitations per installation. REU anticipates significant interest and an
influx of project requests during the 2014 calendar year based on the
number of customer inquiries the Utility has received this year
compounded by the Utility's retail rate adjustment set to go into effect
in early 2014.
Program Performance
Tota I
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
01
01
0
PBI
0
0
0
Tota
01
01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
11
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total o all sectors
11
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
10
50
81,000
0
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
1
831
1,346,220
0
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
11
881
1,427,220
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 1,015,859
$ 913,222
$ 6,427,650
$ 10,233,000
$ 644,506
3MW
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications
not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed:
No
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Yes
Any auditing of installed systems:
Yes
Solar program information on website at: www.reupower.com
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report - (Due July 1 annually for the prior calendar year)
Utility Name: Riverside Public Utilities
Contact Person: Gerry Buydos
Email Address: gbuydos@Riversideca.gov
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
ML Pro
Summary of Program Activities:
In 2012 Riverside Public Utilities (RPU) continued to experience high demand for it's solar rebate program. RPU is
proud to have assisted 446 solar customers through 2012.
At the start of the SB 1, 2012 reporting period RPU residential incentive program remained at $2.50 per AC watt
installed up to 50% of projects costs and capped at $15,000. The commercial incentives also remained at $2.50
per AC watt installed up to 50% of project costs and caps of $25,000, $75,000 and $150,000 for flat rate, demand
rate and Time of Use (TOU) rate commercial customers, respectively. This reduction in incentives from the
previous reporting period was in alignment with the S131 implementation guidelines that requires "monetary
incentives decline at a rate of an average of at least 7% for each year following implementation and be zero by
December 31, 2016." However, both residential and commercial solar programs were fully subscribed on January
1, 2012 and no new applications were taken at this incentive level during this reporting period.
On June 5, 2012 RPU reopened the PV incentive program offering rebate levels at $2.25 per AC watt installed up
to 50% of projects costs and capped at $14,000 for residential and $2.25 per AC watt installed up to 50% of
project costs and capped at $20,000, $60,000 and $125,000 for flat rate, demand rate and TOU rate commercial
customers, respectively and began taking reservations for the FY 12/13 program year funding cycle. Both the
residential and the commercial programs were fully subscribed on September 27, 2012.
As a State designated Emerald City, RPU is continually marketing its PV programs through direct customer
contact, print ads, and electronic media. Program demand continues to exceed available funding. While some
customers were waiting for the program to reopen, other customers decided reductions in PV system installation
costs and alternative funding choices have made it affordable to install their systems without seeking a utility
rebate incentive. In 2012, one (1) governmental agency and twenty-six (26) residential homes installed PV
systems within RPU's service territory without requesting a reservation nor submitting an application for a rebate.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Opportunities:
With solar hardware pricing continuing to decline and the availability of Federal tax credits and attractive
financing options, more residential customers are installing solar systems. The drop out rate between the
reservation and the incentive payment has continued to decrease each year. While the incentives per installed
watt AC have continued to decline over the last two years, the average size of the residential installations has
remained steady. In 2012, the average residential system installation was 4.83 kW AC up modestly from 4.74 kW
AC in 2011. However, the average residential incentive for 2012 was $5,432.13, down dramatically from
$8,608.30 for 2011. This appears to indicate electrical generation and expectations of lowered energy bills, not
incentives are driving the decision to install residential PV systems. In 2012, 26 residential customers installed PV
systems without an incentive or reservation, which is more than double the 11 customers who installed PV
systems without an incentive or a reservation in 2011. This trend appears to indicate the beginnings of a self-
sufficient residential solar industry and a mainstream option for homeowners.
Challenges:
Solar Program demand continues to exceed available local funding for both residential and non-residential PV
programs. In addition, only 1 governmental agency installed a solar system without rebate program assistance in
2012. The reduced incentives, slow economic recovery and uncertainty about continued Federal tax credits could
have an overall negative impact on the non-residential sector's participation in the PV program. In 2011, the
average commercial system installation was 80.66 kW AC and the average incentive was $110,994.54 but in 2012
the average commercial system installation dropped to 20.31 kW AC and the average incentive was $27,952.50.
Typically commercial PV installations take more time to complete due to their complexity, installation constraints
and significantly higher cost than residential systems. It is not uncommon for a solar reservation to be open for
many months before the project is completed. RPU will continue to assist businesses in completing solar
installation projects in a timely manner.
ATTACHMENT
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps
Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
195
183
12
PBI
-
-
Total
195
183
12
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
181
New Construction Tier I
-
New Construction Tier II
-
Total (of all sectors)
181
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total
Systems
Installed
Installed
Capacity (kW)
Total Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
175
841.59
1,843,082.10
$ 950,623.26
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
-
-
-
$ -
Commercial
4
81.26
177,959.40
$ 111,410.00
Non -Profit
-
-
$ -
Government
2
115.24
252,375.60
$ 326,940.00
Industrial
-
-
$ -
Agricultural
$
Mixed -Use
$
Total (of all sectors)
181
1,038.09
2,273,417.10
$ 1,388,973.26
Total
Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid for
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding (Life of
Program)
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of program)
$ 2,585,750.76
$ 2,585,750.76
$ 1,274,817.44
$ 24,930,000.00
$ 13,733,947.06
N/A
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
We had 12 reservations cancelled at the customer's request.
Non-PV solar systems installed: None.
Any training or builder/installer assistance: Training consisted of technical and permitting assistance.
Any auditing of installed systems:
The City of Riverside inspects every installed system and audits all commercial facilities and residential homes
during the rebate application process, except new construction with required Title 24 reports and public agencies
not subject to City of Riverside review and approval.
Solar program information on website at:
www.greenriverside.com
www.greenriverside.com/residential
www.greenriverside.com/business
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Roseville Electric
Contact Person: Renee Laffey
Email Address: rlaffey@roseville.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Rebates for residential and commercial solar systems
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Challenge: Solar leasing
Program Performance ir
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
87
87
PBI
1 41
4
Total
1 911
91
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
76
New Construction Tier I
15
New Construction Tier 11
Total (of all sectors)
91
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
82
279
456,219
$ 354,226
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
8
622
406,465
$ 60,902
Non -Profit
1
4
7,400
$ 5,727
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
91
905 870,084
$ 420,855
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
incentives only
463,887
562,953
$ 14,373,000
$ 229,471
1 14.75 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: none
Non PV solar systems installed: none
Any training or builder/installer assistance: none
Any auditing of installed systems: Normal M & V
Solar program information on website at: www.roseville.ca.us/electric
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Contact Person: Jim Barnett
Email Address: jim.barnett@smud.org
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
SMUD continued administering our solar PV incentive program for residential, commercial, new homes through the SolarSmart
program, SolarShares and multi -family affordable housing through a pilot virtual net metering program. Efforts focused on:
• Educated customers with information material, personal one-on-one communications and group workshops.
• Application intake and approval communications continued through PowerClerk.
• Interconnection reviews and inspections occurred for 100% of the projects installed.
• One-time EPBI payments and monthly or quarterly PBI payments were administrated through PowerClerk and SAP.
• Net -metered customer billing invoices began a redesign process and will implement in late 2013.
• Continuous upgrades to enterprise -wide intercommunications with metering, distribution services, system operations and
reliability, billing, GIS mapping and solar staff automation. The completion of the communication solution between SMUD's
enterprise management software (SAP) and SMUD's solar incentive software (PowerClerk) allows for billing and metered
generation output data to be shared between the two systems.
Program Highlights:
• Commercial program
• Began and ended the year offering Step 7 incentives
• $0.65/watt EPBI, $0.10/kWh PBI
• Customer interest in PV was high but SMUD's low rates contributed to lower than expected project completions
• PBI payments are higher than initially anticipated. Systems are producing more than calculated values based on 30-year
average weather data.
• Residential Retrofit
• January 2012 - began the year in Step 6
• $1.10/watt EPBI, $0.17/kWh PBI
• May 2012 - incentive reduction from Step 6 to Step 7
• August 2012 — Ended PBI option to reduce administrative costs
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
• Declining incentive levels did very little to slow down project activity in the residential retrofit sector. Activity has noticeably
decreased in the commercial market since the incentives dropped from Step 6 ($1.10 per Watt) to Step 7 ($0.65 per Watt).
• The new housing market continued to limp along through 2012 and only now in Q2 of 2013 is the activity picking up.
• The solar leasing business model has the prominent market share for financing residential solar PV systems. The majority of
the observed growth in solar leasing is in the residential retrofit market and beginning to be the builder's choice for the new
home market. The concern is the tendency to distort the true cost of installation due to solar leasing service providers
"optimizing" the federal investment tax credits. The benefit is a set monthly payment that on an annual basis provides net
utility bill savings to the customer, compared to a variable payment based on actual production, such as in a power purchase
agreement, with difficult to determine net annual savings. It is anticipated that solar leasing will continue to grab market share
in the residential solar PV retrofit market. Solar leasing is also showing up in the New Solar Homes market as home builders
look for ways to remain competitive. Solar leasing allows the home builders to keep the cost of the solar PV system out of the
total cost of the new home and price competitive. When the home is purchased, the solar lease is assigned to the new home
owner and on their back.
• PV installation costs have continued to decline. It is getting closer to a subsidy free PV marketplace for high energy use
residential customers. On the commercial side, SMUD's low rates coupled with risk adverse financing options, hold back
widespread PV market penetration.
• Strategies for reducing time and costs for PV project approval, grid interconnection and coordination with building
department agency approvals are being explored.
• Customer education will continue to play a large part in SMUD's role in the solar electric marketplace. We will continue the
development of our SolarMap and other web based products to build customer awareness and understanding to support
customer interest in solar.
ATTACHMENT
Program Performance
Total
Apps
Number of
Rejected/
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Cancelled
EPBI
1323
1310
13
PBI
55
18
8
Total
1378
13281
21
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
827
New Construction Tier 1
6
New Construction Tier II
296
Total (of all sectors)
1,129
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Incentives Paid
Total
Total Systems
Installed Capacity
for Reporting
Category Type
Generation
Installed
(kW)
(kWh/yr)
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
1,100
4,219
6,787,719
$ 4,533,322
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
1
34
54,838
$ 81,143
Commercial
12
3,329
5,907,602
$ 414,996
Non -Profit
8
872
1,528,667
$ 444,432
Government
3
840
854,487
$ 620,965
Industrial
5
1,998
4,369,966
$ 535,980
Agricultural
-
-
-
$
Mixed -Use
2
578
1,305,851
$ 290,392
Total (of all sectors)
1,131
11,870
20,809,130
$ 6,921,229
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Incentives
SB 1 Funding
Funds
kW/MW Goal
Paid/Reporting
Reserved
(Life of Program)
Remaining
(Life of Program)
Year
$ 55,206,673
$ 16,905,622
$ 122,968,520
$ 130,025,000
1 $ 7,056,480
1125 MW
Additional Information (as available
Known customer application issues/applications not approved:
• Installation issues continue with residential retrofit installs. One notable issue continues being the lack of installing a neutral
wire from the PV production meter to the breaker panel. PV production meter placement also continues to be a contractor
challenge despite drawing, discussions, marks on wall, etc. Large turnover in installation staff seems to be the norm and
educating installers continues to be challenging.
• Increased application intake has increased our approval time from days to up to 3-weeks.
• The effects of AB920 has stressed our solar staff resources with customer reaction and confusion with our net -metering
billing procedures and presentment. Invoice redesign is currently taking place.
Non PV solar systems installed:
NONE
Any training or builder/installer assistance:
• SMUD held one 3 day training session in 2012 to prepare participants for the NABCEP certification test. The class was taught
by Bill Brooks from Brooks Engineering. This is an advanced solar PV training class for code compliance of solar PV systems.
• SMUD solar PV system inspectors provide continuous guidance, advice and instructions to solar vendors operating within the
SMUD service territory as part of the solar PV system installation inspections, as well as solar system plan reviews.
• The SMUD website provides customer access to PV information and financing to help customers during the decision process
to invest in solar. Contractors also use the site for program documents and updates.
Any auditing of installed systems:
• As a routine part of program operations, SMUD performs post installation inspections of every solar PV system that applies
for incentives and requests interconnection to operate in parallel with the electric grid.
• PV Check (part of the Clean Power Research tools) allows system -wide performance monitoring to identify underperforming
systems.
Solar program information on website at:
https://www.sm u d.org/en/residentia I/envi ron ment/sola r-for-you r-home/
https://www.sm u d.org/en/bus i ness/environ ment/sola r-for-you r-business/i ndex. htm
https:Hsmud.powerclerk.com/Default.aspx
https://www.smud.org/en/business/environment/solar-for-your-business/solarshares.htm
https://www.sm u d.org/en/residentia I/envi ron ment/sola rs ma rt-homes/
https://www.sm u d.org/en/a bout-sm ud/envi ron ment/renewa ble-energy/community-sola r. htm
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
ATTACHMENT
Utility Name: City of Shasta Lake
Contact Person: Jim Brands
Email Address: jim@esgroupllc.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
Seven (7) new applications were received and approved during CY2012, while one (1)
application was cancelled. Three (3) solar PV systems were installed in the City's service
territory and rebated under the PV Buydown Program during CY2012 (same as CY2011).
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
In 2012, the City lost revenue on 3,113,103 kWh (generated by DG systems in 2012) @
$0.1396/kWh or $434,589.18 and the City has paid $278,518 in solar rebates for this
privilege. As a result, the City implemented a rate adjustment in order to generate $750,000
of new revenue in order to meet required bond covenants as pledged to the bond trustee by
City Council.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
7
7
1
PBI
Total
1 71
7
1
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
3
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
3
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
2
7.23
12,488
$18,351.00
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
1
34.83
57,179
$76,037.00
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
3
42.07
69,667
$94,388.00
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal (Life
of Program)
$97,047.48
$94,388.00
$47,831.55
$2,510,000.00
$2,231,482.76
N/A
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: One (1) application received in CY2011 was
cancelled during CY2012 because the system
wasleased.
Non PV solar systems installed:
none
Any training or builder/installer assistance: none
Any auditing of installed systems:
All sites are subject to an energy audit prior to reservation of S61 funds and 100% of systems
are inspected by a third -party (post -installation) to verify that system performance matches
the EPBB inputs.
Solar program information on website at:
http://www.ci.shasta-lake.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=874
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Silicon Valley Power, City of Santa Clara
Contact Person: Leslie Brown
Email Address: Ibrown@svpower.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
New applications in 2012 were noticeably lower than in previous years,
however total installations in 2012 were higher due to prior year applicants
finally installing their units. Activity amongst the commercial and industrial
sector was strong and we still continue to receive a lot of inquires from both
our customers and solar developers new to our territory looking for
opportunities, since rebate dollars have been almost exhausted in the IOU
territory CSI programs.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: As prices continue to drop and as long as financing continues to remain
broadly accessible, solar will continue to be a popular choice for customers
who not only want to be "green" but who are looking for price certainty in
their energy future. Silicon Valley Power's low rates continue to make solar a
tough sell for customers who do not have a longer term view on their energy
future, but aggressive pricing on pay forward leases and sub $5/watt installed
cost for purchased systems (as we've seen from some installers) is working to
close the gap in pricing. Potential utility rate increases may spur more activity
in the latter part of 2013 and in 2014, but we will have to wait and see. We
continue to experience problems with a couple of unscrupulous installers who
are working outside of our rebate program and pressuring low-income and less
savvy consumers to overspend on undersized solar systems. There were four
known systems installed in 2012 which we encountered after the fact. We had
previously published a Solar Buying Tips article that we re -circulated towards
the end of the year in the local weekly paper in Santa Clara to try and help
combat this, and will continue to look for efforts to reach out and educate
potential target communities.
Program
Performance
Total
Number
Apps
of Apps
Rejected/
Rcvd
Apps Approved
Cancelled
EPBI
33
33
4
PBI
6
6
0
Total
1 391
391
4
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
39
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
39
ATTACHMENT
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Incentives Paid
Category Type
Total Systems Installed
Installed Capacity
Total Generation
for Reporting
(kW)
(kWh/yr)
Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
55
221
316,000
$ 465,607.61
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
0
0
Commercial
7
1991
3185600
$ 32,987.26
Non -Profit
0
Government
1
15
25500
$ 33,750.00
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
63
2227
3,527,100
$ 532,344.87
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Incentives Reserved
SB 1 Funding
Funds Remaining
kW/MW Goal
Paid/Reporting
(Life of Program)
(Life of
Year
Program)
$ 2,921,561.01
$ 2,853,240.24
$ 18,450,225.00
$ 31,500,000.00
$ 13,049,775.00
30 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: The cancelled
projects were all Residential and were removed from the program queue as part of
a follow-up on applications that had not submitted claim forms in over a year after
reservations were confirmed. After looking into the projects we learned that they
had been cancelled for unknown reasons before any work could be done.
Non PV solar systems installed: N/A
Any training or builder/installer assistance: No formal trainings but we will work with new installers one-on-
one if they contact our office with questions about the
interconnection and/rebate process for Santa Clara.
Any auditing of installed systems: SVP has a staff member who has completed the Solar HERS rating certification
and we audit/verify approximately 70% of the systems installed in our service
territory for performance verification before issuing rebate payments.
Solar program information on website at: www.siliconvalleypower.com/solar
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Trinity Public Utilities District
Contact Person: Paul Hauser / Kellie Ambrose
Email Address: phauser/kambrose@trinitypud.com
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
PBI
Total
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
0
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
0
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for
Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
0
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
0
0
206,945
63,055
4001<W
Additional
Information
(as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: No
Any auditing of installed systems: None
Solar program information on website at: TPUD does not have a website.
ATTACHME T 1 Print Form
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report~
Utility Name: Truckee Donner PUD
Contact Person:Kathy Neus
Email Address: kathyneus@tdpud.org
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Even though the program is well known in the area, installations have been few.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: Until people feel better about the economy, applications will continue to
remain low.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EP81
4
8
1
PSI
1 01
0
0
Total
1 91
8
1
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
8
New Construction Tier 1
0
New Construction Tier II
0
Total (of all sectors)
8
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
8
25.1
43,08
$62,721.7
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
0
Commercial
0
Non -Profit
0
Government
0
Industrial
0
0
0
0
Agricultural
0
0
0
0
Mixed -Use
0
0
0
0
Total (of all sectors)
8
25.
43,08
$62,721.7
Total Expenditures Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$27,345.13 $62,721.73
$69,019.001
$1,773,408.00
$1,128,638.431
600
ditional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: No
Any auditing of installed systems: Yes
Solar program information on website at: www.tdpud.org (under Conservation, Rebates)
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Turlock Irrigation District
Contact Person: Nancy Folly
Email Address: njfolly@tid.org
Program Reporting Period: January to December 2012
Program Activitie
Summary of Program Activities: Assist customers that are interested in installing solar.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
169
169
Not Tracked
PBI
34
34
Not Tracked
Total
203
203
Not Tracked
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
40
New Construction Tier 1
1
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
41
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems Installed
Installed
Capacity (kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
21
219.1
1,788,557*
$7,379
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
2
4.0
*In Residential
$382,262
Commercial
3
63.0
189,592*
$97,614
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
3
868.0
4,796,223*
$673,718
Agricultural
12
590.3
3,941,166*
$543,056
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
41
1,744.4
10,715,538
*2012 Generation for
all SBlsystems
$1,704,029
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
$ 1,330,291
$ 1,327,251
$ 17,010,358
1 $ 23,597,416
$ 6,587,057
23
Additional Information
(as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: 100% of systems are field inspected
Solar program information on website at: http://www.tid.com/for-home/rebates/solar-rebate-program
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
ATTACHMENT
Utility Name: City of Ukiah
Contact Person: Mark Gosvener
Email Address: mark@esgroupllc.com
Program Reporting Period:
January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities:
Two (2) new applications were received and approved during CY2012, while one (1)
application was cancelled. Four (4) solar PV systems were installed in the City's service
territory and rebated under the PV Buy Down Program during CY2012 (compared to 13
systems in CY2011).
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Ukiah's Solar PV Program activity increased during CY2011 due to some grants that were
awarded in CY2010. As witnessed by the decrease in activity during CY2012, traditional solar
business continues to lag due to the depressed economy, customer reluctance to invest
sizeable amounts of capital into solar PV systems, and a lack of active solar contractors in the
area.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
2
2
1
PBI
Total
1 21
2
1
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
4
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
4
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid for Reporting Year
Installations
Residential - Market Rate
1
3.85
6,709.00
$6,462.96
Residential -Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
3
16.26
27,813.00
$27,315.36
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
1 4
20.11
34,522.00
$33,778.32
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal (Life of Program)
$39,010.43
$33,778.32
$0.00
$1,530,000.00
$1,330,722.13
N/A
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: One (1) application received in CY2011 was cancelled
during CY2012 because the project was not completed
within the one-year time period.
Non PV solar systems installed:
none
Any training or builder/installer assistance: none
Any auditing of installed systems:
All sites are subject to an energy audit prior to reservation of SB1 funds and 100% of systems
are inspected by a third -party (post -installation) to verify that system performance matches
the EPBB inputs.
Solar program information on website at:
http://www.cityofukiah.com/pageserver/?page=energy conserve
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report - (Due June 1 annually for the prior calendar year)
Utility Name: City of Vernon
lContact Person: Abraham Alemu
Email Address: aalemu@ci.vernon.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: The City of Vernon is currently in the process of installing two systems, a 22kW &
33kW system in the 2013 calendar year.
Future Opportunities and Challenges: 2013 in Vernon is very promising with two systems going
on-line and with the potential of installing more this calendar year. A lot of interest from actual
customers and not necessarily from the contractors which is a big turnaround from 2011.
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
2
2
0
PBI
0
0
Total
1 21
21
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
1
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
1
Systems Installed and Installed
Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
1
30
52,013
0
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
1
30
52,013
0
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid for
Reporting Year
Incentives
Reserved
SIB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
0
0
16,352,634
16,352,634
n/a
Additional
Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: None
Non-PV solar systems installed: None
Any training or builder/installer assistance: None
Any auditing of installed systems: None
Solar program information on website at: http://www.cityofvernon.org/electric rates/Net Metering
ATTACHMENT
Senate Bill 1 Solar Program Status Report
Utility Name: Victorville Municipal Utility Services
1contact Person: Lathresia Ballou
Email Address: Lballou@ci.victorville.ca.us
Program Reporting Period: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
Program Activities
Summary of Program Activities: Offered an incentive of $2.09 per watt up to $15,000 per customer.
Future Opportunities and Challenges:
Program Performance
Total
Number of
Apps Rcvd
Apps Approved
Apps
Rejected/
Cancelled
EPBI
0
0
0
PBI
0
0
0
Total
1 01
01
0
Number of Installations per Building Type
Existing Buildings
New Construction Tier I
New Construction Tier II
Total (of all sectors)
Systems Installed and Installed Capacity per Sector
Category Type
Total Systems
Installed
Installed Capacity
(kW)
Total
Generation
(kWh/yr)
Incentives Paid
for Reporting
Year Installations
Residential - Market Rate
Residential - Affordable/ Low Income
Commercial
Non -Profit
Government
Industrial
Agricultural
Mixed -Use
Total (of all sectors)
Total Expenditures
Total Incentives
Paid/Reporting
Year
Incentives
Reserved
SB 1 Funding
(Life of Program)
Funds
Remaining
kW/MW Goal
(Life of Program)
0
0
0
$92,000
$92,000
0.35 MW
Additional Information (as available)
Known customer application issues/applications not approved: 0
Non PV solar systems installed: N/A
Any training or builder/installer assistance: N/A
Any auditing of installed systems: N/A
Solar program information on website at: http://ci.victorville.ca.us/Site/CitVDepartments.aspx
?id=5534