HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report RESOLUTION: NO 9404
: OF THE
TRUCKEE DONNER PUB.L.IC .UTILITY DISTRICT
ACCEPTING THE GEOLOGIC TEST HOLES Il AND WELL
REHABILITATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE A►NO t3IRECTING
THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District made the
determination to drill two additional geologic test holes and rehabilitate Northside Well as
part of the District's Safe Drinking Water Bond Law Project; and
WHEREAS, the Contract was awarded to Sargent Drilling, Inc. of Reno, Nevada and the
contractor entered into an agreement with the District to perform the work; and
WHEREAS, the District's Consulting engineer, Sauers Engineering, Inc., has
recommended that the work be accepted by the District;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District as follows:
1. That the District hereby accepts the Geologic Test Holes 11 and Well Rehabilitation work of
improvement.
2. That the Clerk of the District be directed to file with the County of Nevada the Notice of
Completion, a copy of which is attached hereto.
3. That 35 days following the filing of the Notice of Completion, the 10% retained from the
contractor payments be released to the contractor if no claims have been made to the District
by material suppliers or laborers.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility
District at a meeting duly called and held within said District on the 7th day of February
1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones, Maass and Sutton.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Ja s A. Maass, President
ATTES
Susan M. Craig, Deputy District lerk
smc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
. Truckee Donner Public Utility District
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Post Office Box 309
Truckee, CA 96160
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the name and address of the public entity for whom the improvement project was
done, as owner thereof, is the TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, Post Office Box
309, Truckee, CA 96160.
2. That on February 7, 1994 the hereinafter described improvements were accepted as
completed pursuant to a resolution of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District, the awarding
authority.
3. That the subject improvements of the Notice are generally described and identified as
follows: GEOLOGIC TEST HOLES II and WELL REHABILITATION, a project located in Truckee,
Nevada County, California.
4. That the name of the contractor for such j roect was: SARGENT DRILLING, INC., 9955
p
N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89506.
Dated: 7 `' TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
By: 2&
Peter L. Holzmeister, General Manager
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF NEVADA
On ,s? , before me, personally appeared PETER L.
HOLZM ST R, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
Capacity claimed by signer: Corporate officer - Clerk/Ex-officio Secretary of the Truckee Donner Public Utility
District.
Witness hand d official seal.
susAN M.CMG t
Jr's'us,6n M. Craig, Notary COMM.#994485 Z Notary Public—CoVomia
NEVADA COUNTY
My Comm.Expires MAY 29.1997
il'V"
RESOLUTION NO. 9405
OF THE
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
APPROVING` PLANS, SPE.CIFICATIOtNS AND :CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS AND ISSUING A CALL FOR: BIDS FOR PIPE
LINING AT "!1L `I-80 CROSSING
WHEREAS, District staff has recommended, and the Board of Directors of the Truckee
Donner Public Utility District has agreed, to go forward with pipe lining at the Interstate
80 crossing; and
WHEREAS, Consulting Engineer Keith Sauers has prepared plans, specifications and
bidding documents for the project and District Counsel has reviewed and approved those
documents; and
WHEREAS, Consulting Engineer Keith Sauers has prepared and filed a categorical
exemption on the project with the County of Nevada as required by the California
Environmental Quality Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District as follows:
1. That the plans, specifications and bidding documents on file in the District's
Planning Department be approved and advertised in an appropriate
manner.
2. That the date and time of the bid opening be scheduled for 2:00 PM on
March 9, 1994.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors at a meeting duly called and held
within the District on the 7th day of February 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones, Maass and Sutton.
NOES: None.
ABSENT. None.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Jam A. aass, President
AT
TE
Susan M. Craig, Deputy District erk
smc
14ES OL tf�"1�N NO.. 94�1 fi
E.
FTH
' UCl O N Pt13LIC tlTIL .
fTY `D1STR..1CT
ACCEPTING` THE PROSSER:WEIGHTS NVELL BUILDING
REPLACEMF`111`T PROJECT.AS COMPLETE AND: 01RECTIIIlG
Ti4FF TC3 FIIiF>TH NC?TICE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public utility District found it
necessary to replace the damaged Prosser Heights Wen Building, and
WHEREAS, the Contract was awarded to Resource Development Company of Sparks,
Nevada and the contractor entered into an agreement with the District to perform the
work; and
WHEREAS, the District's Consulting engineer, Sauers Engineering, Inc., has
recommended that the work be accepted by the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public utility District as follows:
1. That the District hereby accepts the Prosser Heights Well Building work of improvement_
2. That the Clerk of the District be directed to file with the County of Nevada the Notice of
Completion, a copy of which is attached hereto.
3. That 35 days following the filing of the Notice of Completion, the 10% retained from the
contractor payments be released to the contractorifno claims have been made to the District
by material suppliers or laborers.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors at a meeting duly called and held
within the District on the 7th day of February 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones, Maass and Sutton.
NOES: None.
ABSENT None.
TRUCKE'E DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
B
Jame . Maass, President
ATTEST• '
. usan M. Craig, Deputy Distric lerk
smc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
. Truckee Donner Public Utility District
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Post Office Box 309
Truckee, CA 96160
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the name and address of the public entity for whom the improvement project was
done, as owner thereof, is the TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, Post
Office Box 309, Truckee, CA 96160.
2. That on February 7, 1994 the hereinafter described improvements were accepted as
completed pursuant to a resolution of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District, the
awarding authority.
3. That the subject improvements of the Notice are generally described and identified as
follows: PROSSER HEIGHTS WELL BUILDING PROJECT, a project located in Truckee,
• Nevada County, California.
4. That the name of the contractor for such project was: Resource Development
Company, 2305 Glendale Ave., Suite 10, Sparks, Nevada 89431.
Dated: �!/./ _ _ TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
By -�
Peter L. Holifneister, General Manager
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF NEVADA
On February 11, 1994,before me,Susan M.Craig,personally appeared PETER L.HOLZMEISTER,personally
known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the
entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
Capacity claimed by signer: Corporate officer- Clerk/Ex-officio Secretary of the Truckee Donner Public Utility
District.
Witness y hand nd offic seal SIN M.CRNQ
COMM.#9M486
san M. Craig, Notary NEYADA COUNTY
My Comm.epirw MAY 29.1"
TDPUA
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM #
----------------------------------------------.-_-_--___-_-_--______________-_--___--_-_--________________--_-__-__--____________-____-_--_____-_-________________----____-__-___-____-______---_---__--__-_----__
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Mary Chapman
SUBJECT: Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts
DATE: February 1, 1994
Attached please find a copy of the current write-off list in the amount of $6,505,09. This list represents all accounts that closed on June 30, 1993 and prior that stiil have
an outstanding balance. Below you will find an analysis of the accounts that make up the write-offs for the last ten years.
Accounts closed in 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write-off amount:
$ 6,089 6,209 196 133) (283)
$ 2,132 2,132 (20) (71)
$ 8,944 5,704 2,878
$ 6,266 6,667 (90) (117) 194)
$ 1,401 1,951 (346) (153) (51)
$ 4,317 4,659 (155) (14) (73)
$ 2,294 2,423 (99)
$ 4,901 5,207 (167) (10) (16) (107)
$ 1,742 2,196 (102) (2631 i75)
$22,321 9,281 12,781 258
$42,613 9,984 14,606 14,343 3,466
14,878
$19,827 9,743
$20,006
----
Write-offs by year $6, C}9 $7,866 9,425 $61520 57,012 $.10,950 $12,608 $9,845 $14,590 $14,1.61 ;28,087.
Billings (in millions) $9.980 $9.249 $8.588 $8.052 $8.649 $8.170 $7.892 $6.825 $6.831 $6.128 $5.920
Writenff °/a 0.06.% 0
0,06:`0 ,11% ;0,08%;; f3.08°1°:;> 0,13°la fJ:::�6°fn 014°1a 0.2:1%0 0.2�°/a 0,47°I
RECOMMENDATION: That the accounts on the attached write-off list totalling $6,605,09 be written-off and that staff continue to maintain records
of these customers for collection should they apply for service in the future.
194wroff,lst
E6/9T/Z E6 ' SE$ -,goer S-VSS9T
E6/ZZ/E vZ ' 9E9$ U013IA 'U3.9aM 6-66EST
E6Ij8'o/°c �0t, " ZT7$�may{.,, MHOf `"aa5( fl9-i(SSS"��,ty't7�" 9-ST( £8�T
G 6/Jj L L Ij/{Z �f7�V ' T-T T$ mt;'q'o['�1''^.[ g8'�U6Jy�'�d1 L 1'.l y�S—LSO S
�-6] S-1l 3 zY , 7ozoff 4",k.i1fi.L 'x mvi .7—z7vz8
Ep6�/'ZZg /j9 8 '.,9 TS�T}.$ `V CII1�VCI viairl °��I+Op pDy�&t��vIS T-00�U°I
Z6/L0/8 09 ' s$ 'f SSI-docz '93IUd 0-SSz
E6/SO/t' ZS ' 9L.T$ 'v Hdaso ` 'll d L-T66TT
E6/ �j9 8E ' OZv$ YDId Isairl'IIHd rv-LTOST
E 6/O Z/v 6 ' Z E$ vrinva ' ,3��'ISI @ICE 0-6 9 S T
E6/ZZ/E 00 ` EZT$ fiv 'ajla7,. I T-°StZBT
E6/9'T/Z SD , 86E$ 7,HMal Isda ,w 6-TSLLT
E6/SZ/S E6 ' ST$ 2ndaI1S .Niv- <�MoDq L-Z08Z
E6/9'T/Z 08 ' 98E$ `H'u `2KaldMUI T-6SELT
E6/OZ/IV 9L' 98T$ Nvi-da 'HHoH`I L-0S6LT
E6/ST/t, 89 ' 0S$ WE Tvi `NHV-A E-ELLLT .
E6/TZ/S EZ " 99T$ -f jqI1 N 'Ufl '2�S`IIWIH S-9VVgT
E /8t3/9 9E ' LT$ I Z ���H (I '°I'IaMOH 6-EtLVT
E6/ZZ/S ZS ' STT$ WIHE)tV "'A003NVH S-OL6LT
E6/0 T/Z 86 ® OTT$ "� N°3s"IH,Iv-A '2�NODZUS Z-89EL.T
E6/9T/Z 89 ` LT9$ Narmv(l "aNaaHE) V-06�L1
E6/ET/T v0 ' 6{z$ Dial IMV17icOOS T-069ST
G / 6J I L• s� ® O Y $ ®o� 'E LL at 1' .'3.b.w.# —l.7 L..T
i E6/zO/9 T ' 3SS$ zaf.� 'viouve L�OE08T
E6/VO/Z ZB ' TS$ vsauaS 'V'ZC)NIasa L-Tt,68
Z6/ST/9 6Z ` LST$ 2iHHMS 'VZOU VC 6-96OLT
E6/EO/S Z0 , 8tl€$ HvH`I:) l cilquD Z-EZSLT
ZO ® 68T$ K2� 'A 'dalMaaHVO O-Z9SLT
E6/S Z/T SS ' 6ZT$ VNNV Imilsfiv -TEEET
E6/CZ/Z 9Z ' STT$ 'a CL vgzrl '!avi'Iv S-=E €LT
E6/ST/E LE ' SE$ 'slaaaou L-L99LT.
E 6 ff Z/E 00 ' 0 $ Jaar ')Igrlfl T-6008T
aivci Sao-zlia �' L U�sfio # LL5fID
E6/TE/ZT JO
s�e p;D-.00TTO un TTT4'S pu-e -ToTad puv E 6IT E/9 p@sOTD slunOOOV .ZSI°I alga-H.LIH
13jaisia ff.LiriijD. oiriand daNN®(a all'XOrl'L
DPU STAFF REPORT
February 2 1994
0: Board of Directors
FROM. Mary L. Chapman, Administrative Services Manager.
SUBJECT Bills for Board consideration
AGE11[aL?A `
Attached is a copy of the list of bills for Board consideration. Among the bills is an
invoice for work performed on the SCADA project. The funding for this project is
scheduled to come from the COP financing.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Authorize payment of the bills in the usual manner.
2. If the SCADA related bill is approved, transfer out of the Certificates of
Participation funds on deposit with the Local Agency Investment Fund
$14,506.90 to reimburse the general fund for the Sandel/Avery Engineering
invoice.
JP/smc
Attachment
Y
b
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
BILLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL - FEBRUARY 7, 1994
TOTAL ELECTRIC WATER DESCRIPTION
DE CUIR & SOMACH -----202.80--- ---202.80-PROFESSIONAL�SERVICES REGARDING WATER MATTERS.
JAMES MAASS 126.70 126.70 REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR NCPA COMMISSION
MEETING IN ROSEVILLE ON JANUARY 27, 1993.
MACHABEE OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS 8,814.21 8,047.83 766.38 RECONFIGURE BUSINESS OFFICE PER PLAN (840.00)
OFFICE CHAIRS (7924.21) DESIGN TIME (50.00).
PERATA EXCAVATION CO INC. 3,725.00 3,725.00 RETENTION PAYABLE FOR PIPELINE REPLACEMENT JOB.
PORTER SIMON 11,575.50 5,791.10 5,784.40 PERSONNEL MATTERS (3954.00) TAHOE DONNER
PIPELINE REPLACEMENT (126.00) GENERAL REPRESENTATION
(3871.00) ALDER HILL ASSOCIATES (154.00)
PROP 55 (2868.50) NEW FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT
(238.00) DEERFIELD PLAZA (56.00) DOWNTOWN
PIPELINE REPLACEMENT (308.00).
RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES INC. 1,500.00 1,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RE: PENALTY IN-LIEU-OF
REBATE REPORT.
SANDEL-AVERY ENGINEERING 14,506.90 14,506.90 WORK COMPLETED THIS PERIOD ON THE SCADA PROJECT.
SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1,318.96 1,318.96 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
SIERRA WELDING SUPPLY CO. 6,769.94 6,769.94 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF EXHAUST ASSEMBLY
WITH AIR LOCK AND RECOIL, BLOWER AND DUCT
SMOKE EXTRACTION ARM 14 FT WITH HALOGEN LIGHT
FOR THE GARAGE.
WEAVER EQUIPMENT CO. 4,744.03 4,744.03 JOHN DEERE LOADER EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR THE
MONTH OF JANUARY 1994.
WESTERN STATES ELECTRIC INC. 7,341.92 7,341.92 2 15KV 600A OMNI-RUPTER SWITCHES (4590.30)
30 9KV POLYMER DIST. ARRESTERS (1209.78)
8 8.3/14.4 LBC-2 W/SS BRKT (1003.86)
400 SERVICE ENT SLEEVES FOR INVENTORY (259.55)
11 8.3/14.4 LB ELBOW W/TP 2/0-175.700-.865 (276.43) .
GLEN WAGNER FIELD SERVICE 6,187.50 6,187.50 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR ON COMPANY VEHICLES.
--66,813.46---40,327.98 26,485.48
nPUD . STAFF REPORT
February.2, 1994
TO Board of Directors:
.FPoMw Peter L. Nolzmeister, General Manager
SUBJECT: Staff Report
AGENDA: #f
Attached are memoranda discussing the following topics. if Directors wish more
information, staff will be happy to respond.
a) Update on ground source heat pump pilot program
b) U. S. Department of Energy grant proposal for ground source heat pump
monitoring equipment
c) California Municipal Utilities Association grant proposal for ground source
heat pump and energy efficiency training
d) Report on customer end-use survey being conducted by NCPA
e) Report on arbitrage fee paid to IRS
Removal of asbestos from Riverside Drive
g) Finance report through November 1993
PLH/smc
Attachments
TDPf 11 STAFF REPORT: .
January`27, 1994
T
02 Board of Directors.
FROM- Scott Terrell, Director of Planning`
;SUBJECT.` Update on ground source heat pump pilot program
TDPUD staff, along with the Truckee GSHP Steering Committee, has been meeting since
June of 1993 to plan and develop the GSHP pilot program. To date, there have been 75
requests for packages of information on the GSHP systems resulting in 21 applicants for
the program, at least one from each of the six areas designated for pilot installations in
our service area.
There are up to 12 installations proposed in the pilot being donated by GSHP
manufacturers throughout the United States. To date, we have applied for funds to
purchase monitoring equipment to evaluate four of these sites.
Staff is currently interviewing by phone all of the 21 applicants. Some applicants will be
eliminated through this process due to not meeting criteria developed for the project. Our
next step is to do a site analysis to determine each site's suitability to the project. Many
potential applicants will be required to bring their residence up to a certain level of energy
efficiency. Some applicants, if selected, will be required to install centralized ducting in
their home. Participants in the pilot are expected to be selected by April 1994. The
installations of the pilot GSHP systems are still planned for the spring, summer and fall
of 1994.
ST/smc
V)PUD STAF REPOR
January 27, 1.994
T4. Board of fliredtors'
FROM: Scott Terrell,Director of Planning
SUBJECT: U. S. Dept of Energy grant proposal for ground source heat pump
monitoring equipment
On January 21, 1994, TDPUD jointly submitted a grant proposal (copy attached) with the
Sacramento Municipal Utility District(SMUD) for funds to purchase monitoring equipment
to the U. S. Department of Energy.
U. S. D. O. E. has earmarked $20,000 for the funding of ground source heat pump
monitoring activities. TDPUD and SMUD are proposing to split the $20,000 evenly. The
results of this funding are expected to be available by March 1994.
ST/smc
............................................
Truckee Donner Public Utility District Board of Directors
Joseph R.Agues
John L.Corbett
Business Office Engineering Services Robert A.Jones
(916)587-3896 (916)587-3944 FAX(916)587-6056 James A. Maass
Patricia S.Sutton
General Manager
Peter L.Hoizmeister
John Geyer January 21., 1994
Citizens Power and Light Corporation
1211 S .W. Fifth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Dear John,
Enclosed are research proposals submitted by the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and Truckee Donner Public
Utility District (TDPUD) to the U. S . Department of Energy for
geothermal heat pump monitoring activities . Both utilities are
involved with the Geothermal. Resources Council (GRC) Heat Pump
Committee and both serve on the Utility Data Collection
subcommittee . This proposal, contemplates cc-funding by
U.S .D.O.E. for certain aspects of utility data collection.
We appreciate your support and referral of our assistance need to
the U.S . Department of Energy.
If you have any questions you can. reach Bruce Vincent, SMUD, at
(91.6) 732-5397 or Scott Terrell, TDPUD, at ( 91.6) 582-3931 .
,Sincerely,
Bruce Vincent , PE Scott Terrell
Sacramento Municipal Utility Truckee Donner
District Public Utility District
cc : Mr. William N. Sullivan, Sandia National Laboratories
Mr. Lew Pratsch, U.S . Department of Energy
• 11570 Donner Pass Road Truckee, California 96160
Research Proposal
Geothermal Heat Pumps
Bruce Vincent
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
December 16, 1993
SMUD is a public utility serving 467,168 customers in the Sacramento area. 123,375
of these customers are "all electric". Our typical summer peak is about 2,000 MW with
a winter peak of about 1,600 MW. SMUD's Demand-Side Management(DSM)
Programs are designed to match the annual expected growth. By the year 2000,
another 34OMW of additional DSM resources will be required to hold SMUD's
managed peals load to 2,000 MW. The DSM programs annual budget is about $50M
and is expected to continue to the year 2000 and beyond.
SummaN
The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) is a public electric utility serving
about 450,000 customers in Sacramento, California. Of these, about 100,000 are all-
electric residential customers. SMUD is a summer-peaking utility that plans to meet all
of its future load growth through energy efficiency. To accomplish this goal, SMUD is
offering its customers an extensive array of energy efficiency programs, with an annual
budget of about fifty million dollars per year.
To augment its regular energy-efficiency programs, SMUD recently adopted a
Customer Advanced Technology (CAT) Program. The CAT Program will work on a
number of new energy-efficiency technologies with emphasis on near-term results and
collaboration. This program intends to spend $540,000 on geothermal heat pump
activities by the end of 1996. This proposal outlines SMUD's three-year plan and
suggests areas for possible DOE participation.
Background
Few geothermal heat pumps have been installed in California and there is little activity
at the present time. Demonstration projects and other "pre-commercialization"
activities are needed to develop a market and to enable monitoring and evaluation
efforts.
Until the early 1980's, SMUD had very low electric rates and all-electric homes were
quite popular. As a result, Sacramento has about 100,000 all-electric residential
customers. About half are single-family dwellings. Many of the homes have old and
inefficient heat pumps. Some all-electric residential customers have electric resistance
space heating.
Large rate increases occurred during the 1980`s, leaving many of the all-electric
residential customers with high bills. SMUD is seeking generic and easily-expanded
ways to help these customers. In addition, SMUD has a proven and sustained interest
in energy efficiency. Depending on the results of its research activities, SMUD may
develop aggressive DSM programs to promote geothermal heat pumps. These
factors combine to make the SMUD service area a natural test bed for geothermal
heat pumps.
On-Going and Proposed Activities
The attached Customer Advanced Technology (CAT) Program Plan (Section C)
describes SMUD`s geothermal heat pump activities for 1994-96. These include:
• A trial installation of nine geothermal heat pumps in a low-income housing
project. The nine units will be installed on the child care center and the
computer training facility in 1994.
• If the low-income test installations are successful, geothermal heat pumps are
scheduled for installation in 388 housing units in 1996-98.
• The installation of sixteen single-family residential geothermal heat pumps in
1994. If possible, five of the installations will be done in one all-electric
development.
• The completion of a large-scale demonstration project in 1995-6. This project
will put geothermal heat pumps in 100 to 150 homes in Sacramento. The
project will have two primary goals: to test the large-scale economics of
installing geothermal heat pumps and to begin to develop local infrastructure.
• The installation and testing of five advanced technologies or new developments
in 1995 and five in 1996.
The completion of one commercial demonstration project in 1995.
• Participation in the California Geothermal Heat Pump Committee.
If suitable demonstration sites can be located, geothermal heat pumps will be used
with other technologies from SMUD's CAT Program to create state-of-the-art energy
efficiency homes. The other technologies may include: white roofs and shade trees;
advanced air distribution systems; advanced control systems, zoning, economizing,
air-to-air heat exchange and improved glazing strategies.
Monitoring Activities and DOE Involvement
SMUD will install two types of monitoring systems: (1) a simple monitoring system that
will record compressor and fan KW and KWH; (2) a complex system that will record
numerous parameters of interest.
• The simple monitoring system will be used on: (1) all or most of the of the
residential installations completed in 1994; (2) all of the advanced technology
installations completed in 1995 and 1996; (4) the commercial installation; and
(5) some of the residences in the large-scale project of 1995-96. Monitoring
periods will vary from two months to one year.
• The complex monitoring system will be installed on two residential installations
in 1994. The monitoring points will include: (1) fan KW and KWH; (2)
compressor KW and KWH; (3) ground-loop supply and return temperatures; (4)
pump KW and KWH; and (5) soil temperatures. Supply and return air
temperatures and supply air flow may also be measured, depending on cost
and technical feasibility. The monitoring period will be one year.
DOE funding of $10,000 will be used, with co-funding of about $20,000 from SMUD,
for a consultant to perform the following tasks in 1994-95: (1) analysis of monitoring
results; (2) computer simulations of pre- and post-installation conditions for selected
homes; and (3) calculation of demand and energy savings; and (4) preparation of a
final report.
Additional opportunities for SMUD/DOE collaboration include joint testing of advanced
geothermal heat pump technologies in 1995-96 and the possible installation of
geothermal heat pumps at McClellan Air Force Base.
SMUD's proposed budget for geothermal heat pump activities is $80,000 for 1994,
$185,000 for 1995 and $275,000 for 1996. DOE participation may leverage total
SMUD funding of about $540,000.
Research Proposal
Geothermal Heat Pumps
Scott Terrell
Truckee Donner Public Utility District
January 21, 1994
Introduction
Truckee Donner Public Utility District is a publicly-owned
electric and water utility serving approximately 8, 000 customers
in the Truckee, California area. TDPUD is surrounded by two
large investor-owned utilities, Sierra Pacific Power Company and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
The winter electric peak is about 26 megawatts and the summer
peak is approximately 16 megawatts . Due to the cool nature of
the climate, there are almost no air conditioning needs . Due to
the harsh, cold weather conditions in winter there are
significant heating requirements . There are about 8, 000 heating
degree-days (HDD) in the Truckee area annually.
Geothermal heat pumps .look to be a suitable and valuable
appliance for this service area.
TDPUD has budgeted the Planning Director ' s time at a 1993 value
of $6, 000, a 1994 value of $10 , 000 , and a 1995 value of $10 , 000 .
Installation targets and future allocation of human and financial
resources will be determined upon the degree of success of the
pilot project .
TDPUD is a small utility with limited resources . The Geothermal
Heat Pump Pilot Project ' s success to a large degree is dependent
on the community, the Steering Committee, and other non-utility
resources . In part, this is a grass roots effort . The
assistance of other agencies is necessary in the implementation
of a geothermal heat pump monitoring plan.
This proposal to the U.S. Department of Energy seeks financial
assistance of approximately $20 , 000 to enable collection of
performance and economic data to help utility decision making_
This request is submitted jointly with the Sacramento Municipal
Utility District .
Mission
Truckee Donner Public Utility District ' s planning for the Truckee
Geothermal Heat Pump Pilot Program was initiated in May, 1993 to
serve the District and its customers . The four major goals of
40 the project are to:
Provide customers with a cost-effective space conditioning
and water heating technology which assures comfort and
safety.
Improve the utility ' s Load factor and system performance.
Demonstrate an electric space and water heating alternative
to existing fuel sources and technologies .
Improve local air quality by providing a "clean air"
alternative to wood burning stoves .
Provide a safe alternative to propane for space and water
heating. There have been many propane explosions in Truckee
in recent years, resulting in fires, injuries and loss of
lives .
Background
The Truckee area has been served by public power, TDPUD, since
1927 . It is estimated that at least 15% of Truckee ' s 8, 000 plus
electric customers have electric heating. Electric resistance
heating is expensive and is a prime candidate for replacement by
a cost-effective heating technology.
It is estimated that at least 500 of all homes in Truckee are
heated with wood for at least their partial heating requirements .
Air quality is an issue in the Tahoe Basin. Geothermal heat
pumps can improve air quality by displacing wood burning.
The primary fuel used in Truckee is propane. This has received a
great deal of attention due to several explosions in Truckee
resulting in some loss of life. TDPUD can assist the community
by providing an economical and safe alternative to propane .
Natural gas is expected to be available in the Truckee area by
1997 . This delayed availability of natural gas creates a window
of opportunity for near-term introduction of closed loop
geothermal heat pumps .
Develo meet Plan
TDPUD has assumed the leadership role for local sponsorship of
closed loop heat pumps . Nearly one year of development work has
been invested to date. There is a 16 member Citizen Steering
Committee responsible for the planning and implementation of this
project . Geothermal Heat Pump manufacturers contacted by TDPUD
have agreed to donate the equipment and materials necessary to
complete eight installations on homes in Truckee. The Committee
will select the participants from a list of applicants .
Participants will be required to pay the installation costs for
the system and make necessary upgrades to maximize the
effectiveness of the system (i .e . insulation, duct repair, etc) .
Communit-y Su ort
The project has generated considerable interest among customers .
To date, we have over 75 requests for packages of information on
the technology and 17 applications for participation in the pilot
program. They are anxiously awaiting the system implementation
phase of this project . All of those selected have agreed to
allow us to monitor their geothermal heat pump systems as well as
allow the public to take a tour of their home and property to see
their system.
Monitoring Desa_gn
Truckee Donner PUD Staff and the Committee are currently aware of
only two geothermal heat pump installations in its service area .
The Truckee Geothermal Heat Pump Steering Committee is dedicated
to successfully advancing this technology in the Tahoe-Truckee
area if it proves economically justifiable. The Committee is
committed to the successful performance of geothermal heat pump
,systems at each site.
Comprehensive monitoring of each system at the various sites will
not only help us diagnose "problems" , but will improve each
site ' s system performance. This information will be used to
optimize the design and operation of future installations in the
Tahoe-Truckee area . The cost of monitoring will pay for itself
many times over by incorporating valuable data into standardized
local designs .
Monitoring Activities
As the geothermal heat pump installations are installed, TDPUD
plans to set up each site for monitoring. Currently, we have no
monitoring eaui-ment or suiaplies . The Committee would like to
purchase data loggers for each site and access the data remotely
using a PC and modem. TDPUD will provide the PC and modem. If
there is a significant cost savings or reliability improvement
resulting from the use of direct recovery monitoring equipment
such as data modules, tapes, charts, or other recording media,
TDPUD would consider it as a viable alternative.
The types of data planned for collection include demand (Kw) ,
energy (Kwh) , soils thermal performance, and equipment
performance including loop water temperatures, etc .
The expected cost for the purchase of monitoring equipment for
the eight sites is approximately $20, 000 . The cost for
monitoring equipment for four of the sites is approximately
$10, 000 . This is the minimum monitoring level contemplated by
this utility. TDPUD has contacted other organizations including
the Sacramento Municipal Utility District to try to borrow
. equipment available for loan. We have had no success to date .
Staff and Steering Committee members will be responsible for
compiling the data and producing a final report on the results of
the monitoring effort .
DOE Involvement
TDPUD is seeking funding from DOE to supplement its project
monitoring efforts . DOE funding will be used to buy equipment and
set up the monitoring equipment at the various sites . The plan
is to install the monitoring equipment initially in four sites
with the DOE monies . The remaining sites will be equipped with
monitoring equipment as funding becomes available .
We anticipate securing all funds necessary to complete the
monitoring installation of this project by 1995 . Until each site
receives a data logger, utility billing histories will be used as
a measure of the degree of success .
Other Fundin
TDPUD Staff will be approaching other entities for funding
including the : California Energy Commission, Western Area Power
Administration, California Municipal Utilities Association,
Association of Energy Engineers, International Ground Source Heat
Pump Association, etc . Discussion with each of these entities
suggests that there may be some funding available. They are
interested in seeing more data available regarding the viability
and optimal design of geothermal heat pump systems . TDPUD Staff
and the Steering Committee feel that monitoring these systems
will assist in making proper decisions regarding the value/cost-
effectiveness and promotion of these systems .
Protect Timeline
The winter of 93-94 is being used for the Steering Committee to
plan for the geothermal heat pump installations . The Geothermal
heat pump systems will be installed in the Spring, Summer, and
Fall of 1994 . TDPUD would like to secure funding for the
monitoring equipment and monitoring equipment installation for
the first four sites by May, 1994 .
Post-Pilot
if the pilot proves "successful" TDPUD will begin planning for a
long-term program to promote the geothermal heat pump technology
in Truckee . The success of the pilot will be determined by the
economic and load evaluations conducted on the pilot sites . This
will take into account all costs and will also include a
projection of future "lower" project costs due to competition .
The Steering Committee and TDPUD Staff will perform this
evaluation.
This evaluation will produce a recommendation regarding what
direction this project should take . TDPUD Board of Directors will
have the final decision on whether to continue with utility
involvement . Regardless of TDPUD' s future involvement, there
will be at least four heating contractors trained and dedicated
to the promotion of the geothermal heat pump technology in the
Truckee-Tahoe area.
Phase 2 program expansion would likely begin June, 1995 . At this
stage, TDPUD will be investigating different program promotion
strategies such as incentives like rebates, low-interest loans,
interest rate and points buy--down, etc . A long-term program
would likely be targeted at existing all-electric and propane
homes and businesses as well as all new construction.
op:UD STAFF REPORT .
January 27, 1994
To... Board of.Directors
FROM: Scoff.Terrell, Director of Planning
5U8jECT: California Municipal Utilities Association;(CMUA) grant proposal for
ground source heat pump and energy efficiency training
On November 30, 1993, TDPUD jointly submitted a grant proposal (see attached) with
several other utilities for funds to develop and implement a ground source heat pump and
energy efficiency training program for our customers, including contractors. The proposal
is for $49,300 to be divided by the participating utilities. Each utility will have their own
specialized training module.
gr
anted,ranted
l propose to use a portion of the funds, , to train heating, ventilation and air
conditioning (HVAC) contractors to: 1) optimize the design and installation of their air
distribution systems; 2) use a "blower door" to minimize air infiltration heat loss through
building envelopes. The training program will also be used to educate our customers,
especially the pilot program participants, on the GSNP technology.
ST/smc
SE VEST ENERGY CONSULTANTS Consultants to Business and Government
4046 Hil.lswood Drive,Sacramento, Ca 95821 Tel: 916/974-1381 Facsimile: 916/483-2270
November 30, 1993
Mr, Stuart Wilson
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITY ASSOCIATION
1225 8th Street
Suite 440
Sacramento, CA 95814-4809
Dear Mr. Wilson:
It is my pleasure to submit to you the following proposal for a Statewide training program on
Ground Source Heat Pumps under the Model Energy Efficiency Program.
Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact
me at the number above.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Very truly yours,
Nancy W. Sequest
STATEWIDE MODEL ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRAINING PROGRAM PROPOSAL
Background A Consortium consisting of AEE,CEC,Truckee-Donner PUD,Plumas-Sierra REC,
SMUD, Roseville Electric Department, MID, PG&E and Sierra Pacific Power Co., managed by
Sequest Energy Consultants, is pleased to submit this proposal to the California Municipal Utility
Association to implement a Model Energy Efficiency Training Program focusing on Ground
Source Heat Pumps (GSHP).
Goals The Consortium's goals are to: 1) develop a Statewide transferable GSHP training
program; 2) use IRP to assure the lowest possible energy costs through efficiency measures; 3)
implement cost effective GSHP programs; 3) support utility industry cooperation through
assistance and incentives; and 4)provide customer outreach, public education, marketing and new
technology technical assistance programs.
Program The Consortium proposes to plan, design, publish and disseminate one transferable
Statewide GSHP General Program (GP) containing Local Program Modification Modules
(LPMM). In addition, using the GP, the Consortium will plan, design, organize, conduct and
evaluate three individual one-day GSHP training programs in participating utilities' service areas.
The GP's LPMM incorporates the specific training needs each participant utility identifies as
necessary for architects, designers, planners, general, HVAC and electrical contractors,
homeowners and other participant utility stakeholders.
Schedule The Consortium will submit by:
• December 31, 1993 a detailed General Program design to CMUA;
• January 15, 1994 a detailed program for Local Training Program No. 1;
• February 15, 1994 a detailed program for Local Training Program No. 2;
• March 15, 1994 a detailed program for Local Training Program No. 3;
•April 1, 1994 Local Training Programs begin, ending no later than June 30, 1994.
Source of Funds We propose to use CMUA funds to develop the General Program and the
three Local Training Programs together with in-kind participation in time and materials for the
consumer-owned utilities' participation, and a to-be-established buy-in amount from participating
IOUs.
Budget The total cost for performing these services is $ 74,800 as follows:
Utility In-Kind
CMUA Funds Time Contribution
Contract/Project Development $ 4,500 $ 500
General Program Design 3,600 2,500
Marketing/Advertising 10,000 10,000
Program Evaluation/Final Report 1,000 750
$ 19,100 $ 13,750
Specific Design (3)
Program Design $ 3,000 $ 7,250
Speakers, location, etc 2,400 3,250
BCouiam Seminars 3,000
Evaluation & Final Report 1,800 750
Expenses: speakers, travel, etc 20,000 500
$ 30,200 $ 11,750
$ 49,300 $ 25,500 $ 74 800
TDPUt3 STAFF REPORT.
January 27,.1994
TO: Board of Directors
FROM; . Scott Terrell; Director of Planning
SUBJECT. End use survey mailings
On June 7, 1993, the Board authorized the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA)
to conduct an electric end-use survey at a cost of$7,275.
The surveys will be mailed out by NCPA staff in February of 1994. The survey is
expected to be completed and reported to TDPUD by May 1994.
Staff originally planned the survey for 1993, but postponed the project due to the
installation of a new computer system.
ST/smc
TO: Board';of Directors
FROM. Mary Chap man, Administrative Services. Manager
SUB,tECT, Penalty In-Lieu-Of Rebate Analysis prepared are the 1991 Water System lrrtarove-
meat Projects, Cartificates of'Participatim
DATE: February 199
Because the TDPUD is organized as a local government agency, we are permitted to issue
tax exempt debt. However, while the law authorizes us to issue tax exempt debt, it prohibits
us from earning a profit on the investment of tax exempt money. If we begin to earn a profit,
we are required to pay a portion of it to the internal Revenue Service, much like a tax. We
now find ourselves in the position of earning too much interest revenue in the eyes of the
law. We therefore need to pay the IRS.
As of November 30, 1993, we still had about $995,000 in available construction funds on
deposit in LAIF earning 4.365% interest. These funds are currently scheduled to fund a
portion of the water department 1994 capital improvements projects.
The Trust Agreement outlines the procedures that the District must follow since it chose the
penalty in-lieu-of rebate option. To comply with the provisions, we had Craig Underwood,
Vice President, Arbitrage Rebate Department of Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. prepare the
penalty calculations for the period ended May 15, 1993. The Board subsequently entered
into an agreement with Mr. Underwood to provide the required fund analysis every six
months as needed. The analysis done through May 15, 1993 showed that the District owed
a penalty in the amount of $24,560.79. The District paid this amount to the IRS.
The most recent report prepared by Mr. Underwood shows that the District's penalty through
November 15, 1993 is $14,456.64. We have issued a check to the IRS for this amount. The
next time that the fund will be reviewed will be after May 15, 1994 and again after November
15, 1994. We may still have a fairly substantial penalty to pay after the analysis is prepared
through May 15, 1994. If everything goes as planned during this year's construction season,
there will be a very small penalty if any after the November, 1994 analysis.
T PU[ STAF REPO' �T
February A, 1994
TO, Board of.Directors and
Peter L. Holzmeister, General Manager
FROM: Keith iCnib, Sauers Engineering! Inc.
SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS LADENED 'PIPELINE ON RIVERSIDE DID.
AGENDA #
During construction of the Downtown Pipelines Project on Riverside Drive, the contractor
trenched through an old abandoned pipeline. The contractor removed approximately 180 feet
of the pipeline from the trench broken into various lengths and stockpiled it adjacent to
Riverside Drive. Portions of the pipeline were covered with an insulating material. This
insulating material was subsequently tested and found to contain asbestos.
Advanced Installation, Inc. of California, a State certified asbestos removal contractor, was
hired by the District to remove and dispose of the pipe and insulation material. On January
12, 1994, the contractor removed the material from Riverside Drive. The material was shipped
to the Anderson Solid Waste Facility in Anderson, California for permanent disposal.
Public Utility
m �
Truckee Donner Joseph R.Aguera
John L.Corbett
Business Office Engineering Services RR chard K. Curran
( 16) 587-38 6 (916) 587-3944 FAX (916) 587-5056 ,lames A. Maass
Patrivla S. Sutton
General Manager
February 2, 1994 Peter L. Holzmeister
MEMORANDUM
TO: Peter L.Holzmeister, General Manager
FROM: Mary Chapman,Office Manager P'I ) L,k
SUBJECT: Investment Report
As of November 30, 1993, the District had the following investment comprised
of the funds as detailed.
INVESTMENTS YIELD AMOUNT
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 4.365% 5,752,478.53
ELECTIC FUNDS
REA RESERVE' 19,000.00
GENERAL FUND 151,546.99
FACILITIES FEES-PRE AB1600* 446,607.20
FACILITIES FEES-POST AB1600" 1,422.88
STORM DAMAGE FUND` 195,217,92
BUILDING FUND* 868,791.83
------------------------------
TOTAL ELECTRIC INVESTMENTS 1,682,586.82
WATER FUNDS
FACILITIES FEES-PRE A81600* 608,420.59
FACILITIES FEES-POST AB1600' 220,973.81
BUILDING FUND* 762,421.16
RESERVE FOR FUTURE METERS* 741,777.67
TAHOE DONNER WATER SYSTEM FUND* 254,116.32
WEST RIVER ST.ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BOND REDEMPTION FUND 17,338.69
PREPAID CONNECTION FEES 68,279.32
TELEMETRY RESERVE* 53,921.66
TSA(SAD It IMPROVEMENT) 38,980.96
ACQUISITION FUND 1,303,661.53
-----------------
TOTAL WATER INVESTMENTS 4,069,891.71
-------------------------------
TOTAL DISTRICT INVESTMENTS 5,752,478.53
' RESTRICTED FOR SPECIFIC USE PER BOARD RESOLUTIONS
$372,726,31 Prop 55 cost incurred&submitted for reimbursement
Past Office Box 309 0 11570 Donner Pass Road Truckee, California 9 160
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND
NOVEMBER 30, 1993
HISTORY OF ACTIVITY FOR MONTH:
BALANCE IN GENERAL FUND 09/30/93 (119,018.29)
---------------------------
RECEIPTS
ELECTRIC REVENUE 579,1 1 2.84
WATER REVENUE 202,184.17
MISC. BILLING REVENUE ELECTRIC 16,872.11
MISC. BELLING REVENUE WATER
699.34
CONSUMER DEPOSITS, ELECTRIC 21,384.75
CONSUMER DEPOSITS, WATER 2,805.00
CUSTOMER ADVANCES-CONNECTION FEE ELECTRIC 11,1 50.00
CUSTOMER ADVANCES-FACILITIES FEES-ELECTRIC 3,000.00
CUSTOMER ADVANCES-OTHER ELECTRIC 1,388.00
CUSTOMER ADVANCES-CONNECTION FEE WATER 6,750,00
CUSTOMER ADVANCES-FACILITIES FEES-WATER 1,992.00
MISC. REVENUE ELECTRIC 241.86
MISC. REVENUE WATER 128.75
UNRESTRICT ACQUISITION FUNDS 27,458.02
UNRESTRICTED FUNDS FROM PRE A81600 69-9,693.37
TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,570,860.21
DISBURSEMENTS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DISBURSEMENTS 1,202,688,13
LESS VOID CHECKS PREVIOUS PERIOD (37,570.83)
TRANS. TO ELECTRIC RESTRICTED FUNDS-FACILITIES FEES 3,000.00
TRANS. TO WATER RESTRICTED FUNDS-FACILITIES FEES 1,992,00
---------------------------
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 1,170,1 09.30
---------------------------
BALANCE IN GENERAL FUND 10/31/93 281,732.62
DISTRIBUTION OF NON-RESTRICTED FUNDS AT MONTH-END:
PETTY CASH/CUSTOMER SERVICES OPERATING FUNDS 600.00
TRUCKEE RIVER BANK GENERAL FUND 129,585.83
LAIF GENERAL FUND (NOT RESTRICTED) 151,546.99
---------------------------
281,732.82
$372,726,31 PROP 55 COST INCURRED AND SUBMITTED FOR REIMBURSEMENT
'TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT: 1993 OPERATING BUDGET REPORT 1193-11/93 92%
ELECTRIC: WATER: TOTAL:
REVENUES: Budget Actual Budget Bal % Budget Actual Budget gal % Budget Actual Budget Bel -
------------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------•---•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------. _.. _ - -__w _..----------
Residentialsales 3,444,863 3,362,849 82,014 98% 1,828,200 1,808,378 19,822 99% 5,273,063 5.171,227 101,836 98%
Commercial sales 2,670.736 2,535,229 135,507 95% 399,600 280,631 118,969 70% 3,070,336 2,815,661 254,475 92%
Large commercial sales 613,721 583,553 30,168 95% 0 0 0 0% 613,721 583,553 30,168 95%
Safes to public authorities 82,865 71,862 11,003 87% 0 0 0 0% 82,865 71,862 11,003 87%
Fuel charge 266,340 353,258 (86,918)133% 0 0 0 0% 266,340 353,258 (86,918)133%
Interdepartmental sales 471,100 437,695 33,405 93% 810 659 151 81% 471.910 438,353 33,557 93%
Misc operating revenue 107.215 106.142 1,073 99% 10,000 18,858 (8,858)189% 117,215 124,999 (7,784)107%
Misc rents 46,199 45,906 293 99% 10,000 677 9,323 7% 56,199 46,584 9,615 83%fl
Standby revenue 31,880 22,525 9,355 71/° 338,000 159,640 178,360 47% 369,880 182,165 187,715 49%
Interdepartmental rent 128,144 117,469 10,675 92% 0 0 0 0% 128.144 117,469 10,675 92%
Fire protection fees 0 0 0 0% 61,000 60,317 683 99/° 61,000 60,317 683 99%
--------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------
Total Operating Revenue 7,863,063 7,636,487 226,576 97% 2,647,610 2,329,160 318,450 88% 10,510,673 9,965.648 545,025 95%
Capitalized interest income 0 0 0 0% 413,015 468,817 (55,802)114% 413.015 468,817 (55,802)114%
Interest income 96,341 59,288 37,053 62% 2,500 1,622 878 65% 98,841 60,910 37,931 621°
----------------------- -----------------------------------------»-----------------------------.----------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------».. ---------------__-...__....._-
Tatal Revenue 7,959,404 7,695,775 263,629 97% 3,063,125 2,799,599 263,526 91% - 11,022,529 ----10,495,375 - - 527,154 -95%
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT: 1993 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY 1/93-11/93 92%
ELECTRIC: WATER: TOTAL:
Budget Actual Budget Bal % Budget Actual Budget Bal % Budget Actual Budget gal- _._ %
--- ---- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------�---------------------------------------------- ---------
Revenues 7,959,404 7,695,775 263,629 97% 3,063,125 2,799,599 263,526 91% 11,022,529 10,495,375 527,154 95%
Less Expenses_
Board of Directors 95,090 307,813 (212,723)324/° 31,460 129,660 (98,100)412/° 126,550 437,373 (310,823)346%
General Manager 172,391 187,081 (14,690)109% 64,220 56,453 7,767 88% 236,611 243,534 (61923)103%
Administrative Services 545,895 481,435 64,460 88% 299,701 249,144 50,557 83% $45,596 730,579 115,017 86%
Planning Services 177,003 166,920 10,083 94% 75,857 76,812 (955)101°/ 252,860 243,732 9,128 96%
Technical Services 352,621 250,091 102,530 71/° 43,619 42,549 1,070 9S% 396,240 292,640 103,600 74%
ElectriclWaterOperations 798,44$ 810,804 (12,356)102% 1,448,296 1,220,121 228,175 84% 2,246,744 2,030,925 215,819 84%
Purchased Power 5,200,000 5,139,807 60,193 99% 0 0 0 0% 5,200,000 5,139,807 60,193 99%
Interdepartmental rent 0 0
{} 0% 128,144 117,469 10,675 92% 128,144 117,469 10,675 92%
Debt service 355,403 308,258 47,146 87% 887,110 825,588 61,522 93% 1,242,513 1-133,845 108,668 91%
----____------__________________________
Total Expenses 7,696,851 7.652,208 44,643 99% 2,978,407 2,717,696 260,711 91% 10,675,258 10,369,904 305,354 97%
Net Revenue less Expenses 262,553 43,567 218.986 17% 84,718 81,903 2,815 97% 347,271 125,471 221,800 36%