HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Reports .... . . ....
O DI ANc NOA 930
O TEE
TR fCE C N R PUBLIC t TILITY' DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING WATER RATES
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District,
hereinafter referred to as District, has adopted a budget for the year 1994; and
WHEREAS, that budget allocates resources to provide for the proper operation,
maintenance, repair, replacement and expansion of the District's water system; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that in order to carry out the public trust in providing
for the needs of the community water system it is necessary and prudent to increase the
financial resources of the District water system; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 1993 a public hearing was held to receive comments from
the public concerning the 1994 budget and planned water rate increase;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District as follows:
1. Effective with the effective date of this ordinance, all portions of prior
ordinances and/or resolutions that are inconsistent with the provisions of
this ordinance are hereby repealed insofar as they are inconsistent.
2. RESIDENTIAL WATER RATES - The Domestic Water Rates for single
family homes, individual condominium units and townhouse units shall
relate to the pressure zone in which said service is located. The Domestic
Flat Rate Base for all zones shall be the fixed monthly rate of$27.61. The
appropriate zonal pumping costs shall be added to the base monthly rate
yielding the appropriate flat zonal rates as follows:
ZONE RATE
Zone 1 29.22
Zone 2 30.62
Zone 3 31.28
Zone 4 32.03
Zone 5 32.40
Zone 6 32.74
Zone 7 34.36
Zone 8 35.32
Zone 9 35.68
Zone 10 37.95
Zone 11 40.09
3. COMMERCIAL WATER RATES - The following Commercial Rates shall
apply to all duplex and other multiple dwelling units, trailer parks, and other
commercial establishments:
SIZE SERVICE GALLONS PER WATER RATE
MONTH
is ALLOWANCE
3/4" 6,000 24.51
1" 11,000 29.15 _
1 1/4" 17,000 34.94
1 1/2" 24,000 40.96
2" 42,000 56.40
3" 96,000 94.56
4" 171,000 135.63
Water used in any month above the allowance will be charged as follows:
GALLONS CHARGE
0 to 16,000 gallons 1.14/1,000
16,000 - 56,000 gallons .92/1,000
56,000 - 96,000 gallons .7111,000
96,000 and above .59/1,000
The following Zone Charge per 1,000 gallons shall be added for all water
used.
ZONE CHARGE
Zone 1 .183
Zone 2 .335
Zone 3 .419
Zone 4 .503
Zone 5 .544
Zone 6 .587
Zone 7 .773
Zone 8 .880
Zone 9 .923
Zone 10 1.176
Zone 11 1.424
Until meters are installed, the Commercial Flat Rate shall be based on the foregoing
allowance, and the Zone Charge shall be levied against the maximum number of
gallons in said allowance.
4. If no protest is made pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 16078, then this
ordinance shall be effective as of the date it was adopted by the Board of Directors,
but the rate adjustments made by this ordinance shall become effective with the
billing cycle commencing in February 1994.
5. The Clerk of the District shall immediately cause a copy of this ordinance to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation and posted in three places within
the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District
at a meeting duly called and held within the District on the 20th day of December 1993 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones and Maass.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Sutton.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
By
Jame . Maass, President
�r
ATTEST
Susan M. Craig, Deputy District Cler
RESOLUTION N0. 35Q
OFTHE
TRUCKEE DONN15R PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT. :.
ADOPTING CERTAIN OVERHEADS TO B USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH .
THE UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the Truckee Donner Public Utility District has elected to adopt the Uniform
Cost Accounting Act policies and procedures, and
WHEREAS, the Board directed that the overhead rates be recalculated each year for
inclusion in the annual budget; and
WHEREAS, the budget for 1994, which was adopted on December 20, 1993, contained
revised overhead rates; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 8924 directs that the Board of Directors will, by separate
resolution, adopt overhead rates as contained in the budget on an annual basis;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District that the overhead rates to be used for 1994 are as follows.-
Labor overhead 56.6%
Vehicle overhead 39.7%
Inventory overhead 34.13%
Administrative overhead 3.8%
Construction overhead 21.0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE/T RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors at a meeting duly called and held
within the District on the 20th day of December 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones and Maass.
NOES: None.
ABSENT, Sutton.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
Jam A. Maass, President
ATTEST-1
Susan M. Craig, Deputy Dis ct Clerk
RESOLUTIO NO 9351
of THE . ....
TRUCKEF DONNER PUBLI` UTILITY a1ST`RICT
EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER
AGENCY FACILITIES AND POOLING AGREEMENTS.
WHEREAS, Truckee Donner Public Utility District is a member of the Northern California
Power Agency (NCPA) and has as its goal to eventually enter into a cooperative
arrangement with the ten interconnected NCPA members, those members being the
Cities of Alameda, Biggs, Gridley, Healdsburg, Lodi, Lompoc, Palo Alto, Roseville and
Ukiah and the Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative; and
WHEREAS, these ten interconnected members and NCPA staff have developed Facilities
and Pooling Agreements by means of which they will promote the best utilization of their
power resources in a manner beneficial to all participants and their customers; and
WHEREAS, this District wishes to formally state its agreement with the principles and
practices embodied in the Facilities and Pooling Agreements recognizing at the same
time that this District is not currently a signatory to those agreements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District that the NCPA Facilities and Pooling Agreements approved by that
agency by its Resolution 93-19 on September 22, 1993, in the form presented to this
meeting, has this District's support. Further, that the NCPA staff and ten interconnected
members are commended for their continued cooperation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors at a meeting duly called and held
within the District on the 20th day of.December 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones and Maass.
NOES: None.
ABSENT., Sutton.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
By
Jam A.�Maas�sresident ���
ZATTE
Susan M. Craig, Deputy Di4krict Clerk
PLH/smc
RESOLUTION NO. 9352
O THE
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS AND ISSUING A CALL. FOR BIDS FOR ;GENERATC)R
CONNECTIONS AT VARIOUS PUMP STATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District has
determined to proceed with generator connections at various pump stations; and
WHEREAS, funds for this project are included in Proposition 55 funding; and
WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt as a Class 1 Exemption (minor alteration
of existing public facilities); and
WHEREAS, Consulting Engineer Keith Sauers has prepared plans, specifications and
bidding documents and District Counsel John Phelps has reviewed and approved such
documents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1 T RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner
Public Utility District as follows:
1. That the plans, specifications and bidding documents be approved and
advertised in an appropriate manner.
2. That the date and time of the bid opening be scheduled for 2:00 PM on
January 18, 1994.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors at a meeting duly called and held
within the District on the 20th day of December 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Aguera, Corbett, Jones and Maass.
NOES: !None.
ABSENT. Sutton.
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
J 6es A. Maass, President
ATTEST '
Susan M. Craig, Deputy D' rict Clerk
smc
I'RUCKEE DON14ER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
BILLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL - DECEMBER 20, 1993 DESCRIPTION
ELECTRIC WATER
JAMES MAASS r124.90 Y--- - -- --- ' - -
124.90 REIMBURSEMENT FOR NCPA DECEMBER COMMISSION
MEETING IN ROSEVILLE.
MBNA AMERICA BUSINESS CARD 33.80 33.80 HOLZMEISTER NCPA MEETING LUNCH.
MCDONOUGH, HOLLAND & ALLEN 4,360.05 3,052.04 1,308.01 PERSONNEL MATTERS.
SAVERS ENGINEERING INC. 31,584.00 1,274.00 30,285.00 PROP 55 (26060.00) HWY 267 RIVER CROSSING (50.00)
MISC REQSTS AFTER ANDY (395.00) SCADA (175.00)
FACILITIES FEES (180.00) MISC REQ ELECTRIC (25.00)
ELECTRIC SYS WALL MAP (1274.00) GROUNDWATER
MANAGEMENT (250.00) HIRSCHDALE WATER QUALITY
(640.00) FACILITIES FEES REIMBURSEMENT (510.00)
LAFCO ANNEXATION APPLICATION (170.00) PROSSER
WELL BUILDING (1855.00) .
- �- � -_^
36,102.754,484.7431,593.01
REVISED 12/17/93
i
December 16, 1993
TO Bard of Directors
FROM; Peter L.''Holzrneister, General Manager
SUBJECT Staff Report
�tGF11D # 19
A) No storm problems - The first storms to hit Truckee this year have posed no real
problems for our system. We have had some individual services experience damage and
small isolated brief outages related to trees failing or insulators breaking. These problems
have been quickly remedied by our line crew.
B) Supervisory training - Nine first line supervisors spent two days in a supervisory
training program. The subject was performance appraisal, but many other elements of
supervisory practice were touched on. We purchased a training program from the
American Management Association and led ourselves through it as a team. l believe it
was very productive. We will do more of their kind of training in 1994.
C) Removal of asbestos at Riverside Drive - As you will recall, our downtown
pipeline contractor encountered an unmarked and unused pipeline on Riverside Drive that
contained asbestos. We are arranging for removal of the small quantity that we disturbed.
Keith Knibb is managing the removal and disposal process. We have advice from an
attorney in the DeCuir and Somach law firm on how to proceed and we are making sure
that all public health notifications are being met.
D) West River Street soils analysis - Please review the attached letter and report
from Keith Knibb dated December 14, 1993. 1 have asked Keith to prepare a cost
estimate for proceeding with the project. / would also like to talk further with legal counsel
at DeCuir and Somach before proceeding. My preference would be to have the
responsible party do a clean-up before we proceed. After staff has generated more
information, we will place this matter on the Board's agenda for discussion and direction.
E) SPPCo response to our transmission request - NCPA staff is analyzing the
SPPCo response to our transmission request. We do not expect NCPA staff to be
complete with that task until late January. We are on hold until then.
F) Bacteriological report- The Summary of Bacteriological Water Quality report for
the month of November prepared by Dave Rully is attached_ All 43 distribution system
samples as well as all 20 source samples were free of coliform bacteria.
. G) Budget report- The 1993 Operating Budget Report through October prepared by
Mary Chapman is attached.
S auc-r s Eris i neer ins Inc. 9162656834 F1. 05
at+ � En +rr�r � lac;
Civil & Enylrf:nmeofal Engineers 435 Coyote Street
Nevada City, CA 959
(916) 26 -80-2.1.
December K 1993
r. Peter L, Holzmeister, General Manager
Truckee Donner Public Utility District
P.O. Box 309
Truckee, CA 96160- 309
SUBJECT: Downtown Pipcline-s, Vest River Street Soil Assessmcnt
Dear Peter;
This letter is our report regarding the completion of the West River Street portion of khe
Downtown Pipelines project. Construction was suspended in October when the
contractor encountered suspected fuel contaminated sail. Soil sampling and analysis has
confirmed the fuel contamination. This report examines the soil assessment and
alternatives for completing pipeline and service construction.
Current Status
There are approximately 460 feet of pipeline and two services left uncompleted on West
River Street. Of the two uncompleted services, one customer is presently being served
through a pirated service- line. The ether, a co ,mmercial building under construction, is
not being served although the developer has applied for a water development agrectuent
with the District and paid the appropriate deposits.
Soil Asscssme.nt
Klienfelder was retained by the District to provide soil sampling; and analysis to
determine whether contaminated soil was present along the proposed pipeline route:.
Their task was not to attempt to identify the source or extent of soil contamination, only
to assess the nature and presence of contamination along proposed pipeline routes. Ti c
Rlienfelder report is attached.
Results of the assessment confirm the presence of fuel contamination with the highest
conc-Utra.tion in the: north end of the trench crossing West River Street. Results of
sampling along Nest Diver Street west of the trench crossing indicate lower levels of fuel
contamination on bath the north and south shoulders.
1
S a uers Ens i nc-er i n-� I rjr— 9162E.56834 P- Oi
TI)c District Could also wait for the possibility that the site would be etc-aned up and
excavation could continue in uncontaminated soils. There is no indication, however, of
any planned cleanup of the area.
Recommendation
I recommend that the pipeline and senices be completed according to the original
desigii. The point of connection between the two pressure zones was an important
future of the project as was the elimination of unauthorized services.
Our office will be available to discuss this matter with the Board of Directors at your
convenience.
Yours truly,
SATJERS hNICANNEERINCY, INC.
Keith Knibb, Project Engincer
Eno.
3
.. ............................. ................................... ..... .....................
21
s auer a Eng i rim- r i ris I rF 9162656834 0
KLEIN' FELPtR
November 4, 1993
File: 30-1580-02.001
Mr, Peter Holzmeister, General. Manager
Truckee-Donner Public Utility District
P,D. Box 309
Truckee, CA 96160
SUBJECTS- Soil Assessment, West River Street
Downtown Pipelines Project, Truckee, California
Dew'
Mr. 14olzmeister,
This letter report documents Kleinfelder's soil assessment activities and results on Truckee-Donner
Public Utility District (MPUD) West River Street Downtown Pipelines project in Truckee,
California. During the course of excavation, TDPUD's contractors reported fuell odors in one
trench, Subsequent analyses by Kleinfelder confirmed the presence of diesel, motor oils, and
gasoline constituents.
Project Backgt`ound .
During excavation for a water line, TDPUD contractors encountered fuel-bearing sails in a trench
crossing West River Street. TDPbf) retained Kleinfelder to assist m assessing the nature of the
contamination and its presence along the proposed water Be routes on bath the north and south
sides of West River Street. The trench location where fuel contamination was first encountered lies
immediately adjacent to Bi-State Petroleum, a bulk fuel storage facility. In addition, another bulk
fuel facility formerly existed on the west side of the Bi-State's facility.
Assesment Adyines
To develop information on`the contaminants in the soil., and on the contaminant's presence along
the intended water line trench, Kleinfelder provided the following services,
Collected and analyzed three soil samples from the original trench crossing West
River Street, 'Three sail samples were analyzed as shown on Table 1. Plate 1 shows
the trench and sample locations.
. Drilled three soil borings can the north edge of West River Street, west of Bi-State
Petroleum, using a mobile drill Three soil samples, one from each boring, were
rig.
analyzed as shown! on Table 1. Plate 1 shows the borehole locations (borings l3-1,
B-2, and B-3);
Collected soil samples from seven locations on both sides of West River Street using
a GeoprobeTm. Seven samples, one from each boring, were analyzed as shown can
iTable 1. Plate 1 shows the sample locations (borings B-4 through B-1 .
30-1580-02.01 Page 1 of 3 November 4, 1993
Copyright 1993 KIcinfc1der,Inc.
raFt�r c fin? i n er i tic Icy,-v. 916265 834
The trench samples were collected by hand on October 4, 1993 and placed in clean jars 5uppliy
the analytacal laboratory. Alpha Analyytical Laboratory (Alpha) of Sparks., Nevada, analyzed tt�e
samples. Analyses included total peetroleum hydrocarbons-extractable ('I`I'H-E) for diesel, and total
petroleum hydrocarbons-purgeable (TPH-P) for gasoline range hydrocarbons; for the aromatic
hydrocarbons benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8240; total
recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons URPH) by EPA Method 418.1; and organic lead by the
l UFr document method.
The drill rig samples (October 8, 1 93) and the Ceoprobe samples (October 14, 1993) were
collected in metal sleeves driven into the ground. All sample containers were labelled, capped, and
.placed
in an iced container. The were then handled and relinquished under chain-of ustody
protocol to Alpha. Table 1 shows a analyses conduct.
Alpha is approved by the California Department of Toxic Substances (CDTS) and certified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the TPH and BTEX analyses. Alpha used Associated
Laboratories (Associated) of Orange, California., for the lead and TRPH analyses. Associated is
qualified as stated above to perform these analyses.
Ass e s m nt R
Analytical results of the three trench samples showed the sample on the north side of West. River
Street to contain diesel at 2,0 mgfkg. The other two trench samples contained non-diesel
the
sample
, collected from the sobons. The uth end ohest f the trench. The backgrounround concentration was dhydrkg as ocarbonsHsmple
sample Tl� 3,
TD-2 were not quantified.
one sample each from the drill rig borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 were analyzed for 'TPH-D and
BTEX, Alpha reported the results for the samples from B-1 and B-2 as non-detect (1D) for each
test. ]However, the sample from B-3 (M-,0?8), although. ND for diesel, showed low
concentrations of BTEX, which are gasoline constituents.
Alpha analyzed one Geoprobe soil sample each from borings B4 to B-b for TPH-E and BTEX,
and for TPH-E from borings B-7 through B-10. These locations represented points along
alternative water line paths. Each sample contained background levels of non-diesel
contamination, with sample TD-010 in boring B-4 containing the highest concentration of this
assessment as verbally estimated by Alpha. Sample TD-01.2 from boring B-b also contained low
concentrations of benzene, toluene, and xylenes.
Copies of all laboratory reports and sample chain-of-custody forms are attached.
piscussion and Conclusions
The soil sample analytic results indicate a substantial quantity of diesel appears to be located on
the north side of West River Strut (2,000 mglkg) where the original trench crossed in front of Bi-
State Petroleum. Four samples, all from the south shoulder of Nest River Street, exhibited non-
diesel background hydrocarbons. However, only the sample collected from the trench's south end
was fully qualified by the EPA Method 41.8_ , with a 300 mg/kg result. Four soil. samples
exhibited aromatic hydro rbon constituents (ETEX), however, only one had elevated levels;
sample '1'T�-t�l, on the trertch's likely t end where the,he diesel rwagthe r than��sep�tet gasoesel line plume of
13T� constituents are very hlc y
contamination.
30-1580-02-01 Page 2 of 3 November 4, 1993
,pyright 1993 Mcin&144br.I=.
SauerS. Eng i neer i ns Inc.
The analytical results suggest the presence of diesel and heavy hydrocarbons such as motor ,~ails
and/or grwcs, The distribution of the soil samples indicates.
a Diesel is present in soil adjacent to the southwest corner of Bi-State Petroleum's
facility, as evidenced by the diesel results in the sample from the original trench's
northwest end;
0 Hydrocarbons heavier than diesel, likely in the range of motor oils or grease, appear
to be present on both the north and south sides of west River Street, particularly in
sample TLC-W3 and in borings B-3, 134, and B-7.
Recorr�rnetl i n
]used on leinfelder's observations and laboratory analytical. results, Kleinfelder recommends the
following:
Additional trenching for placement of utility lines should be conducted as much as
possible on the south side of West River Street;
6 Trenching, soil testing, and sail disposal (if required) should be conducted by
qualified personnel,
A copy of this report should be provided by TDPUD to the Nevada County
Department of Environmental Health.
Environmental assessments such as presented in this report are by nature non-comprehensive and
subject t4 limitations, including those presented below.
K:leinfelder has performed this environmental assessment in accordance with the generally accepted
standards of care which existed in eastern California at the time of this study. Please recognize
that definition and evaluation of environmental conditions is a difficult and inexact art. Judgments
leading to conclusions and recommendations are generally made with an incomplete knowledge of
the subsurface andfor historical conditions applicable to the site. KleMelder should be notified for
additional consultation if the Truckee banner public Utility District wishes to reduce the
uncertainties beyond the level associated with this study. Because of potential changes in the
environmental Meld such as regulations and site conditions, this report should not be relied upon
beyond 90 days from the date of service. This report is for the sole use of the Truckee Danner
Public Utility District. We provide no warranty, express or implied.
e appreciate- the opportunity to provide the TDPUD with our Services. Please do not hesitate to
call if we can be of further assistance.
i
Very truly yours,
KLERJTTLDERI INC.
o R. Dyer, R.G., Wally
�.E.A obison, R.E.A.
J P ect Geologist 'Senior Engineer
30-1580-02.01 Page 3 of 3 November 4, 1993
&'y�svriihE 7443 K3cinfelrler.Ine_
SauF E-r s Engineering Inc.. 9162656834 P. 05
KLEIN fELDER
SOIL SAMPLE DATA AND ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
TRTjCT EE-DONS. PUBLIC UTILITY ]DISTRICT
Nest River Street, Truckee CA
Tab No. 30-=1 80-02.001
Cnncen tmfinm
Trench-North TD-1 2 20M 48 - 32 47 280 810 ND
Trench-Mid TD-2 3 ND - - - - - -
Trench-Saucy TD-3(2) 4 ND - 300
B-1 TD-005 5 ND - - ND ND ND ND
-2 TD-007 5 ND - - ND ND ND NIA -
E-3 TD-008(2) 3 ND - - 2 8 ND 8 -
B-4 Tf)-010(2) 5 ND - - AID NIA ND ND -
TD-011 5 ND - - ND 3 ND 2 -
B-b TD-012 5 16 _ 3 3 ND 1 -
B-7 TD-013(2) ND -
B-8 TD-014 ND -
B-9 ID-015 5 ND - - - - - - -
B-10 TD-016 5 ND
(1) BTEX as fig/kg (ppb); TPH-G, TPH-D, Lead and TRPH as mg/kg (pFm)
,) High amount of non-diesel background hydrocarbons present based on Alpha's review of
the chrornatographs.
(3) Organic lead
NOTE:
Detection liWts on all samples except T -01.5 elevated due to the presence ofnon-diesel
background hydrocarbons.
B = benzene; T - toluene; E = t thylbenzene; X = xylenes
TPH-P = total petroleum hydrombons - gur eable
T,pH-B_ total petroleum hydrocarbons - extractable (-Quantified as diesel)
TRPH — total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons
Copyrighk 1993 Kloinfcidcr,1—
A111 Rights Rcacrv4
-.:r'r`!t��"- .<'a.3 r. � •+..-• •,•p����"�47��1+�7���y+'�' ,., .i.•�""`. w z+�'•—' - .�Mr��•tiG).�� .�i.
OF
i t a, :,nr vt� _�ci� y • ,�� �.
YAM
.► "i`.:+, ,�,« '� - '"gym' ; "+.•d .. Ap
w'
i�}��'"��iw«",,tZ���a i+�� y 'r'` ��L'... ��;1• ;•.• _ ' �� ,. q�•�,y��• ,,r ,. .r 41�'l�. -{ iri►"�.3riiss�'r +wrt����i��i'
Ir
V '�k}� KY'� !•'.�? y���rtist""- �� a-�''�t'.,,�y,`M1 }�+'.. .i'_*a►, '.�"'�-"a,,,,l'M;, �+•.�•+„ i�'p'��L•l`;1�34'�'� �.
{ �
Cy�,� a•i,r# I i ,� M'� �" �!..Y �+. • ~ " • J�-. �e•r , -";�' * :�•.yj�,g
41
Y• �
■ ■■■ ■■■■■■ ■ ■■ ■
■■�■■■■ �H■■ on ■■
■ ■■■ ■ ■°' oilON fil
■ ■■
LIM
ME 1
■
OEM
FARM no
so
■■I■■E■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■�■■ ■■
■■■■ ■
A �
Saue-rs EnA i nc—er i n9 I n 91 62wM.56834 r=. x_s
toil,a
jAmftg nAYA AND ANALVllf i 61FMMAAY
•'1w>SE'!'CIfli1NEh Mab63C Vi€L€fY if+�f h✓„C Al r"'-F w�^'' .•+"" r 11��
' WN3f Plc'rM 51•sN1.Y!u[ANN C'i 'J > R
,xnhD 1Cktb8vP7 UGi ':y -- a
1j :r �nOq NE - 32 ax xnn rrs4
N] NP hu 3:7 - -... 3.23.• _�« -"' X-�
.�. 3 Nil ND
6 ND 6
ND RD NO
ND
s��'r "i7f.- .,1q-'i }v,•;• 1w3 1. :;:":�.Ap-+.n,u wN��
y �i3^ IYM rRti h kN.w_t.+!
,cb KLtFiF1 bER ^" Yqa 1 r, Plate 1
,:ram f a•4tM L �1,1 }, 1�{
� '° a. y--r -: ���•' i'f!`+� e: .la NE'MY '� ,�" i
.n«+"�;�fAttili.l*S�1KfaA7Slf�f.if.raa•711�`�,»•-..-.+. •3 '
-
J
!
,
—Ak
' s
AVERS ENGINEERING, INC. -
Chscked: Civil and Environmental Encsanpf-.rs
UtilityTruckee Donner Public Board of Directors
Joseph R.Aguera
John L.Corbett
Business Office Engineering Services Robert A.,tones
(916) 587-3896 (916) 587-3944 FAX(916) 587-5056 James A. Maass
Patricia S.Sutton
General Manager
Peter L. Holzmeister
MEMORANDUM
Date : December 9 , 1993
From: David Rully
To: Peter Kolzmeister
Subject : Monthly Bacteriological Report _ November 1993
Attached is the "Summary of Bacteriological Water Quality" report
for the month of November 1993 .
The November portion of the report shows that all 43 distribution
system samples were free of coliform bacteria. The report also
shows that all 20 source samples were free of coliform bacteria.
The district has met the State ' s drinking water standards for the
month of November.
Past Office Box 309 11570 Donner Pass Read Truckee, California 96160
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT '
System Source
Samples Portions Percent Samples Portions Percent
Yr. /Month Collected Positive Positive Collected Positive Positive
1993
October
(Truckee) 26 0 0 11 0 0
(Prosser) 7 0 0 8 0 0
(Hirschdale) 1 0 0 1 0 0
1993
November
(Truckee) 32 0 0 12 0 0
(Prosser) 10 0 0 7 0 0
(Hirschdale) 1 0 0 1 0 0
0
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT: 1993 OPERATING BUDGET REPORT 1/93 - 10/93 83%
ELECTRIC: WATER: TOTAL:
REVENUES: Budget Actua€ Budget Bat % Budget Actual Budget Bat % Budget Actual Budget Bat %
---------------------- ---------------------------^---------------------.--- ----------- -------------------------------------------- --------
Residential sales 3,444,863 3,100,810 344,053 90% 1,828,200 1,635,989 192,211 89% 5,273,063 4,736,799 536,264 90%
Commercial sales 2,670,736 2,318,828 351,908 87% 399,600 270,058 129,542 68% 3,070,336 2,588,886 481,450 84%
Large commercial sales 613,721 532,109 81,612 87% 0 0 0 0% 613,721 532,109 81,612 87%
Sales to public authorities 82,865 66,370 16,495 80% 0 0 0 0% 82,865 66,370 16,495 80%
Fuel charge 266,340 334,560 (68,220) 126% 0 0 0 0% 266,340 334,560 (68,220) 126%
Interdepartmental sales 471 100 406,587 64,513 86% 810 598 212 74% 471,910 407,185 64,725 86%
Misc operating revenue 107,215 96,901 10,314 90% 10,000 2,859 7,141 29% 117,215 99,760 17,455 85%
Misc rents 46,199 41,062 5,137 89% 10,000 14,852 (4,852) 149% 56,199 55,914 285 99%
Standby revenue 31,880 22,525 9,355 71% 338,000 159,640 178,360 47% 369,880 182,165 187,715 4(7/
Interdepartmental rent 128,144 106,790 21,354 83% 0 0 0. 0% 128,144 106,790 21,354 83%
Fire protection fees 0 0 0 0% 61,000 54,747 6,253 90% 61,000 ------54,747 6,253 90%
-------------- ------------------------------ --------...._ -----
Total Operating Revenue 7,863,063 7,026,543 836,520 89% 2,647,610 2,138,743 508,867 81% 10,510,673 9,165,286 1,345,387 877
Capitalized interest income 0 0 0 0% 413,015 429,075 (16,060) 104% 413,015 429,075 (16,060) 104%
Interest income 96,341 53,768 42,573 56% 2,500 1,622 878 65% 98,841 55,390 43,451 56%
------------------------------------ ------ -------------- --------.--------------------- ------ ------- -
Tota€ Revenue 7,959,404 7,080,311 879,093 89% 3,063,125 2,569,440 493,685 84% 11,022,529 9,649,751 1,372,778 88%
-------------------
TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT: 1993 OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY 1/93 - 10/93 83%
ELECTRIC: WATER: TOTAL:
Budget Actual Budget Bat % Budget Actual Budget Bat % Budget Actua€ Budget Bat %
.. -1----------------------------- -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
Revenues 7,959,404 7,080,311 879,093 89% 3,063,125 2,569,440 493,685 84% 11,022,529 9,649,751 1,372,778 88%
Less Expenses:
Board of Directors 95,090 304,979 (209,889) 321% 31,460 128,416 (96,956) 408% 126,550 433,395 (306,845) 342%
General Manager 172,391 155,451 16,940 90% 64,220 53,880 10,340 84% 236,611 209,331 27,280 88%
Administrative Services 545,895 445,532 100,363 82% 299,701 229,316 70,385 77% 845,596 674,848 170,748 80%
Planning Services 177,003 145,722 31,281 82% 75,857 65,919 9,938 87% 252,860 211,641 41,219 84%
Technical Services 352,621 234,927 117,694 67% 43,619 38,538 5,081 887. 396,Z40 273,465 122,775 69%
Electric/Water Operations 798,448 757,335 41,113 95% 1,448,296 1,129,323 318,973 787. 2,246,744 1,886,658 360,086 78%
Purchased Power 5,200,000 4,620,085 579,915 89% 0 0 0 0% 5,200,000 4,620,085 579,915 89%
Interdepartmental rent 0 0 0 0% 128,144 106,790 21,354 83% 128,144 106,790 21,354 83%
Debt service 355,403 289,677 65,726 82% 887,110 624,978 262,132 70% 1,242,513 914,656 327,857 74%
--------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------- -..-----------------------------------------
Totat Expenses 7,696,851 6,953,709 743,142 90% 2,978,407 2,377,160 601,247 80% 10,675,258 9,330,869 1,344,389 87%
Net Revenue tess Expenses 262,553 126,602 135,951 48% 84,718 192,280 (107,562) 227% 347,271 318,882 28,389 92%