Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
General Fund
TRUCKEE-DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND - August 31 , 1979 Bank Balance - August 15, 1979 $ 112,116.14 Truckee Electric & Water Revenue 105,959.60 Donner Lake Electric Revenue 30,341 .06 Electric Connection Fees 13,700.00 Water Connection Fees 6,051 .00 Facilities Fees 1 ,175.00 Sierra Pacific Power Company Refund-voided checks 2,529.55 Miscellaneous Billings Revenue 3,013.94 Miscellaneous Revenue 1 .00 $ 274,887.29 Approved billings $ 1 ,557.05 Arthur Anderson & Co. - Balance on 1978 audit 4,500.00 Bank of America - Federal tax deposit 8/15/79 payroll $ 2,828.96 - Federal tax deposit 8/31/79 payroll 3,298.04 - Transfer to LAIF 90,000.00 - Truck loan payment 474.02 96,601 .02 George Cattan - pension plan payment 258.75 Department of Benefit Payments - state income tax and state disability deposit 1 ,423.95 Directors - Board meeting attendance 450.00 I.B.E.W. - union dues, 8/79 216.00 Petty cash - to replenish petty cash fund 170.31 Refunds: Connection fees (customer not building on property) Sunwood Construction 82-006-01 490.00 Refunds: Credit balance on closed account r-� Sherry Ball 12-051-07 $ 11 .2.5 Douglas Coulter 67-133-05 33.18 Susie Perry 17-528-02 23.90 William Smith 61-065-01 10.22 78.55 Tahoe National Bank - computer loan payment 356.44 TDPUD - interest on consumer deposits 8.27 U S Postmaster - Postage meter $ 200.00 - Postage permit #1 525.00 - Postage stamps 75.00 800.00 West River Street Assessment District- Temporary transfer to cover bond and interest payments due 3,700.00 $(110,610.34) PAYROLL OT DT Standby Gross Net Black 510.40 414.48 Bennett 502.97 375.61 Boone 510.40 354.36 Chapman 780.21 570.56 Connell 729.52 522.55 Craig 75.47 677.35 486.05 Grow 936.32 664.71 Hossack 535.04 427.38 Jones 17.40 527.80 376.60 Lopez 98.80 968.24 671 .79 Lyson 385.44 279.27 f Marsh 46.47 687.99 497.53 Norton 317.25 287.14 ( Pomponio 636.24 464.48 Reynolds 896.00 615.62 Rully 28.71 875.37 595.53 Seymour 1337.50 918.40 Silva 63.84 106.40 1106.56 791 .97 Slattery 802.50 596.76 Straub 869.44 613.57 Tamietti 766.48 627.44 Waltrip 649.44 472.91 231 .89 205.20 16008.46 11624.71 PAYROLL (Continued) Temporary & Part-Time Employees OT DT Standby Gross Net Crenshaw 522.72 385.60 Jones, T. 522.72 385.60 Lopez 356.40 279.13 McQuary 249.40 195.90 1651 .24 1246.23 231 .39 205.20 17659.70 12870.94 (12,870.94) PAYROLL 8/31/79 OT DT Standby Gross Net Black 556.80 417.02 Bennett 799.24 572.84 Boone 556.80 363.92 Chapman 780.21 546.37 Connell 795.84 552.80 Craig 78.08 679.96 457.55 Grow 31 .92 1057.86 723.73 Hossack 583.68 444.26 Jones 13.05 569.85 385.91 Lopez 948.43 648.49 Lyson 420.48 286.72 Marsh 699.84 489.73 Norton 869.44 617.99 Pomponio 694.08 483.99 Reynolds 100.80 1068.48 688.84 Rully 50.24 1007.24 630.00 Seymour 1337.50 918.40 Silva 31 .92 1053.36 750.83 Slattery 802.50 571 .17 Straub 98.80 1047.28 704.32 Tamietti 836.16 648.72 Waltrip 708.48 495.09 205.21 199.60 17873.56 12398.69 Temporary & Part-Time Employees Crenshaw 8.91 579.15 418.83 Jones, T. 522.72 385.60 Lopez, J. 237.60 195.96 McQuary 269.70 210.39 8.91 1609.17 1210.78 214.12 199.60 19482.73 13609.47 (13,609.47) Bank Balance - August 31 , 1979 $ 137,796.54 Bills for Board Approval (See Attached) $(255,409.24) Bank Balance after payment of above $(117,612.70) LAIF Transfer to cover above bills - Transfer to be made September 5, 1979. General Fund balance in LAIF after transfer is made $738,553.37 118,000.00 Balance of account after LAIF transfer $ 387.30 BILLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL: Electric Water General Total Ace Hardware Forklift & compressor rental , miscellaneous 122.82 39.59 162.41 hardware Aetna Life & Casualty Life insurance, 8/79 63.44 63.44 Allied Automotive Miscellaneous auto parts 104,84 104.84 Alpha Hardware Miscellaneous hardware 5.41 163.84 138.39 307.64 Atlantic Richfield Gasoline 1 ,155.14 1,155.14 R. W. Beck & Associates Consulting services, rate proceeding by Sierra 5,732.10 5,732.10 Pacific Power Company before FERC 28 Beir & Gunderson Secretarial chairs 443.45 943.45 Blue Cross Health insurance, 9/79 & back premium adjustment, 3,943.45 3,943.45 April thru July, for new plan Cal Western Life Pension plan premium, 9/79 2,250.73 2,250.73 Camellia Valley Supply Curb stop, clamps, saddles, valves, drill adaptors 910.02 910.02 Carson Manufacturing Co. Traffic cones 160.06 160.06 Chevron USA, Inc. Kerosene 67.34 67.34 Citation West Pressure hose 90.53 90.53 Clarke Stationers Office supplies 516.33 516.33 Cook Associates Consulting services, 7/79 4,495.29 4,495.29 Billed: Dart Resorts $ 1,478.03 Don Toomey 51.29 Lowell Northrop 27.00 $ 1,556.32 CSUS Foundation Registration fee - seminar for office managers 455.00 455.00 Digital Equipment Corporation Maintenance coverage on computer, 8/79 99.00 99.00 DRI Industries Nut & bolt shop 23.85 23.85 General Electric Supply P. 0. 5009 - 500' 2/0 THW copper wire $ 1 ,535.48 6,680.24 132.39 6,812.63 200 4" bell insulator P. 0. 5025 - 40 watt fluorscent lamps 132.79 P. 0. 5023 - 1,584 various types service 821.31 sleeves P. 0. 4980 - 10,000' #2 triplex conch 2,996.67 P. 0. 4799 - 50 IOKV lightning arrestor 941.60 cutout combination P. 0. 5010 - 150 3" spool insulator 108.12 P. 0. 5023 - 900 2" service sleeve 276.66 General Pacific, Inc. 10,000' conch #2 triplex, mounting brackets, 3,912.16 miscellaneous hardware BILLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL: (Continued) Electric Water General Total Georgia Magnetics Diskettes for computer 254.59 254.59 Grumer & Pfotenhauer, Ltd. Legal services, 8/79 178,00 600.00 353.00 1131 .00 Jones-West Ford Transmission repair - boom truck 1 ,525.37 1 :525.37 L & V Fuel, Inc. Gasoline 278.71 278.71 Magi Chem Ant & weed killer 394.85 394.85 McDonough, Holland, Schwartz Legal services, 7/79 1 ,436.05 233.19 1,669.24 & Allen 218.80 M & R Construction Paving & grading due to water leak 218.80 National Rural Electric Magazine subscription 9.00 9.00 Cooperative Association Osburn's Garage Vehicle repair 387.80 178.80 10 Pacer Piping Supplies, Inc. Pipe supplies 178.10 375.54 Pacific Telephone Monthly telephone charges, 7/79 375.54 169.75 Monthly telemetry charges, 7/79 195.30 195.30 Poole Fire Equipment Check & recharge fire extinguishers 95.30 75.58 Red Star Industrial Linen service, 8/79 75.58 75.58 RTE Corporation P. 0. 4853 - 1 75 KVA transformer $ 2,827.02 24,347.14 24,347.14 P. 0. 4853 - 1 150 KVA transformer 9,129.78 - 1 112.5 KVA transformer - 1 75 KVA transformer P. 0. 4853 - 2 112.5 KVA transformer 8,606.14 - 1 75 KVA transformer P. 0. 5022 - 6 15 KVA transformer 3,784.20 - 6 25 KVA transformer Ruralite Services, Inc. Safety training, 6/79 197,00 197.00 Sandel-Avery Engineering Engineering services, 8/79 1,012.30 1,012.30 Sierra Engravers Office supplies 88.93 88.93 Sierra Pacific Power Co. Purchased power, 7/79 139,920.15 139,920.15 Sierra Sun Bonanza Publication of Ordinance 7905 73.00 73.00 Siri Office Supply Office supplies 109.43 109.43 C. E. Sloop Meter guards 77.30 77.30 Sun Printing Office supplies 47.92 47.92 Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation Agency Water analysis for month of 7/79 59.68 59.68 Larry Taylor's Instant Print Office supplies 480.50 480.50 Teichert Aggregates Fill 251.15 251.15 Tippecanoe Press Inc. Office supplies 20.08 20.08 Tom's T.V. System, Inc. Cable charges, 7/1/79 - 10/1/79 33.00 33.00 Truckee-Tahoe Lumber Co. Cement 12.47 12.47 Martha Spencer Key punch 8,000 IBM cards for standby charges 155,20 155.20 c^� BILLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL: (Continued) Electric Water General Total Truckee Taylor's Tires, Inc. Tires 169.46 169.46 The Union Publication of Notice of Application to appropriate 115.50 115.50 water from Prosser Creek reservoir & Boca reservoir Utilities Telecommunications Voluntary share for FCC frequency coordination 40.00 40.00 Council 48,323.81 Wedco, Inc. P. 0. 4662 - 6 McGraw-Edison reclosures $ 43,451 .52 48,323.81 for Martis Valley Substation P. 0. 4977 - 100 watthour meters 2,570.50 P. 0. 5008 - 200 bolt covers 195.04 P. 0. 5030 - 2500' #2 triplex conch 914.25 P. 0. 5007 - 1000 aluminum clamps 879.80 P. 0. 5007 - 100 2-bolt aluminum clamps 312.70 Western Nevada Supply Co. 200 3/4" gate valves 1,213.35 1,213.35 Phil Willard Enterprises Janitorial services, 8/79 160.00 160.00 232,457.55 9,841.34 13,091,60 255,409.24 R E E 6 VO THE TDPUD BOARD From at Sutton, Director AUG l�TAugust 20, 1979 re: June 18, 1979 Minutes d 3 J TRUCKEE DON NERA L%pe August 6 Board Meeting, I indicated that I had several corrections S I wished to submit which were not yet in written form. The Board approved the June 18 Minutes as drafted. If the Board does not accept these requested corrections, I request that this Memo be attached to the Minutes of tonight's meeting. Page 3 of Draft: Discussion of Airport Transmission Main I Second Paragraph under Item: ADDITION requested before last sentence In this paragraph to more accurately reflect the discussion, so that entire paragraph would read: "Director Sutton noted that, by specific Board action, this matter was set for review and discussion at a special meeting to be held on June 26th. The President disagreed and read back the motion that was made: 'Director Sutton moved that the Board set a Special Meeting to consider the Airport Well transmission facilities and related appurten- ances and also consider the environmental impact at that meeting some- time in June, after the second week. The motion was seconded by Dir- ector Hatch. ' Director Sutton noted that it was generally agreed by those present that June 26 was the date the Special Meeting was to be set. Mr. Maass further noted he placed this item on the agenda." II Last Complete Paragraph on this page: ADDITION requested before last sentence in this paragraph to record in the Minutes some recap of what was discussed, so that entire paragraph would read: "Proposed mitigation measures that would offset the environmental impacts were set forth by Mr. Cook. In answer to a question posed by Director Sutton, Mr. Cook advised that all the adverse project-associ- ated impacts are covered in the mitigations. Discussion ensued relating to whether or not the project is growth inducing. Mr. Cook indicated that the secondary questions are more difficul.$ to assess, and that his answer to Question 18 on the Rating Form about cumulative impact Is "yes." He indicated that he answered that question ".yes" because this is an element of a larger project, that there are 6,000 lots in Tahoe Donner and approximately 4,000 lots that the District is committed to serve outside of the Tahoe Donner Project which it has no basis for serving right now. Mr. Cook stated that this project, in his view, and its overall benefit has an enormous magnitude for the good of the community. He said that to go back and rejudge whether or not Tahoe Donner or other subdivisions should have been created would be invalid, and that now the District is charged with satisfying the consumptive needs for the 6,000 lots at Tahoe Donner and the 4,000 lots in the balance of the District with the least economic and environmental impacts on the community as possible, which he believes this project does." th1 MEMO from Sutton August 20, 1979 re: June 18, 1979 Minutes page 2 Page 4 of Draft ,.- Agreement with Dart III Third Paragraph under this Item: ADDITION requested so that the Minutes more accurately reflect what was said, so that the entire paragraph would read: "Director Sutton requested that the Ordinance be reviewed, stating she was positive the first step, before the Negative Declaration, is the approval of the project by the Board or there would be no project to have an environmental evaluation of, the first thing being to determine that the concept is wanted." Page 6 of Draft Return to Public Session - Public Hearing IV Second Paragraph under Public Hearing: CORRECTION requested so that the Minutes do not falsely convey the idea that members of the public who were not representing Dart were still present to partici- pate in the Hearing; correct the wording of the paragraph so that it reads: "There were no members of the Ad#1y11 public present,other than Dart representatives, e� 14.YJX�X to participate in further discussion of the Airport water transmission main and related facilities; therefore, the Chairman declared the Public Hearing closed." Smi_tted by AT SUTTON Director copied to: Seymour Grumer Cook McDonough S. Craig TRUCKEE-DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 309 TRUCKEE, CALIFORNIA 95734 - TELEPHONE 587-3896 MANAGER'S REPORT September 5, 1979 1. General Status of the District - Attached to this report are the monthly water consumption figures for the month of August. To help place these figures in per- spective, I have posted on the board in the Board Room a graph showing water consump- tion for the past one and a half years. Later in the meeting you will have a chance to compare that graph with-a graph prepared for Dan Cook showing electric demand and electric usage for a period of some three years. Although there have been no significant outages of either water or electricity during the past two or three weeks since the last Board Meeting, we do have a prob- lem with a water leak under the Southern Pacific tracks. A late-night operation is planned and scheduled to correct this leak situation. The work will commence at 2:30 in the morning and stop about 6:00 A.M. This will inconvenience the fewest num- ber of people. Essentially, it is our plan to abandon the water lines under the Southern Pacific tracks and reroute the water. New applications for service continue to be received at a record rate_ It ap- pears now that the new electrical connections this year may well exceed 500, and that our total number of electrical customers will go above 4,400- 2. Vandalism - Southside #2 Well - During the night of August 29th, somebody started a large bulldozer near the theater construction located close to the Southside Complex. They ran the bulldozer through out new Southside Well #2 pumphouse. it totally destroy- ec the pumphouse and possibly damaged the pump and piping. Inasmuch as the pumphouse and work had not yet been accepted by the District, the problem falls to the contractor, C. W. Roen, who, in turn, will undoubtedly try to collect from the owner of the bull- dozer. It was the opinion of the adjustor for Royal Globe Insurance Company (who came out and viewed the situation) that the bulldozer owner would ultimately be liable. Dan Cook estimated that it would cost $50,000 to replace all the damaged material, pipe, etc. 3_ Twelfth Biennial Conference on Ground Water - Department of Water Resources - On August lst I sent to the Board a notice of the Twelfth Biennial Conference on Ground Water to be held in Sacramento, California at the Woodlake Inn. Some Directors in- dicated an interest in attending this conference. It also appears that, at the same time, there will be a two-day workshop on load management sponsored by the California Energy Commission aimed at smaller utilities who do not have the facilities or staff to do a great deal of research on load management. I feel that it would be well worth the District's time and money to have representatives attend either or both functions. 4. Sierra Pacific Power Company rate increase - The District and the City of Fallon responded to Sierra Pacific's proposed compromise on the rate increase saying that they accepted the fuel clause adjustment but felt that the demand charge should be a little higher and the energy rate a little lower. Sierra Pacific has now respond- ed to the Energy Commission relating to these comments and has documented their pro- posed rate. It is my guess, at this point, that the rates proposed by Sierra Pac- ific in early August will be those that are finally put into effect. These rates are 3.89 per kilowatt of demand, plus 2.18(P per kilowatt hour on the energy con- sumed, plus an $ 1,000 customer charge, plus a fuel charge for the cost of fuel in excess of 1.8249,P per kilowatt hour_ The total effect of this will be a rate increase that will average, for us, about 5%. TE?UCKEE-DONNER, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT WATER SYSTEM PRODUCTION ' MONTH Of-: _ILI 1979 NORTHSIDE WELL . . . . onn---- PROSSER HEIGHTS WELL . . DONNER CREEK 14ELL. . . . . SOUTHS1DE WELL #1 SOUTHS i DE WELL ##2 SANDERS WELL AIRPORT WELL TONINI SPRING 2 z3 /ov McGLASHEN SPRING r c r SOUTFf.SIDE- SPRING A & L3 WE4_LS. 1 .D. r 1r^ / :� -U TOTAL PRODUCTION:;,}" C �- 6 LS o { fi 1 T.D. USAGES ��t�' O rx,. '..I• tt? l; TOWN' USAGE.'. t .I i .i r •a Y7ly� R � 1 ` tr'11 ,4 { WJ r''yrt'" erg d'- r t�5 rfy f! 1�,� 4�'ff. it CORREEI - ,C � RFPdRT PREPARED B' Y.... C r1ORDINATE: t�ENDINQ .y ----- — I .t� r 9 y�7� f ~ - C. •C�- __ _�-9•_ -_ - ..{•A7t- .7� 1 - _ ems:• _ _:.. :: _-. .: �5#rx#e of C1��t[tfurii� o. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 E D M U N D G. BROWN J R. _ RER E tl '%fB E p AUG 2 4 1979 -- August 231 1979 TRUCKEE DONNER P.U.D. gY Mr. Seymour Truckee-Donner Public Utility District P .O. Box 309 Truckee, CA 95734 Subject: SCH# 79080213 Airport Water Transmission Main Dear Mr. Seymour: State agencies have commented on your draft environmental document (see attached) . If you would like to discuss the concerns and recommendations in their comments, contact the staff from the aaencies whose names and addresses appear on the comments . you may formally respond to the agencies ' comments by writing to them (including the State Clearinahouse number on all such correspondence) . When filing the Final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (State EIR Guidelines , Section 15146) . State review of your draft environmental document will then be r-^ complete . `moo aid in preparing environmental assessments on future protects , _ emu sh_cul& send to state agencies and the Office of Planning. and Research your Notice of preparation as prescribes: by B 884 and Section 15066 of 111E E7R. �111d�11nE5 . 7-ft you .could care for assistance Gr if the need ar-Ses , the Of-flce of Lunn-ng and Research , s avai lable to help ldentIfy responsible aaencies , Q'1Str=butte Notices of Preparation, organize coordination - ' ings ; mediate disputes , and hold consolidated clearings . Please contact Laura Ericson a=-- (916) 445-0613 if you have a nv c,,iestions - Sincerely, o epn Wi ll' amson State Clear='1aiouse nttachme_t. cc : Ken _ _llcws , L:vR qz :tcia pf Talifornia THE RESOURCES AGENCY Memorandum o 'I _ Mr. L. Frank Goodson Projects Coordinator Date. AUG 15 The Resources Agency In Reply Refer Resources Building, 13th Floor To: 420 : 2. Truckee-Donner Public Utility District JH P . 0. Box 309 Truckee, CA 95?34 (916) 322-9870 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF PLANNING AND RESEARIEH vbiect: REVIEW OF NOTICE OF INTENT : SCH 79080213 - AIRPORT WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN The attached comments from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board constitute the comments of the State Water Resources Control Board. L. Ray Dunham Acting Branch Chief Attachment cc : -California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region P. 0. Box 14367 South make Tahoe, CA 95702 TS-4 ( 1/78) _ REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CON-rROL BOARD Q� t INTERNAL MEN10 'FO: John H. Huddleson FROM: ROY C. HAMPSON, EXECUTIVE OFFICER Division of Planning and Research LI)ATE: August 14, 1979 SIGNATURE: SUBJECT: REVIEW OF INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, TRUCKEE-DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN, SCH #79060213E We have reviewed this document and wish to offer the following comments. General Comments We recommend that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared for this project because of its potentially significant growth-facilitating effects in Martis Valley (page 4) . Such facilitation could greatly increase the demand for wastewater treatment capacity in this area. S?ecific Comments page 13, question 13. The assessment states that the project could not affect the use of recreational areas and/or areas of important visual value. If adequate erosion and drainage control measures are not applied during construction near the Truckee River, sedimentation could affect its recreational and aesthetic value. page 21, question 19. It is concluded that the project could not "change , the existing features of any of the regions . . . stream beds. " Again, if not controlled, sedimentation resulting from construction could change the character of the Truckee River's streambed. page 23-24. Mitigation measures for construction activities should include contingency plans for runoff control in the event of a thunderstorm. Please telephone Judith E. Unsicker at this office if you wish to discuss these comments. cp SN RCS 326A(4j75) SURNAME: atote bf. California Business and Transportation Agency Memorandum To Mr. Kent Smith Date: August 15 , 1979 Deputy Division Chief, DOTP Department A-95 Cooxdinator File 03-Nev-267 / Airport Water Transmission Main SCH 79080213 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 3 oject: District 3 has reviewed the E. I.R. for the proposed Airport Water Transmission Main to be constructed to serve the Tahoe Donner Subdivision. The document appears to adequately address the require- ments for construction within the state right of way. Please refer to the attached sheets for additional information. LEO J. TROMBATORE District Director of Transportation E. F. Galligan Deputy District Director Transportation Planning Attach. TRUCKEE-DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT 10 POST OFFICE BOX 309 TRUCKEE. CAL-IFORNIA 95734 TELEPHONE 587-3896 August 27, 1979 Roy Hampson, Executive- officer STATE WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD Lahontan Region 2092 Lake Tahoe Blvd- South Lake Tahoe, California 95705 Dear Mr. Hampson: I am in receipt of your letter of August 14, 1979 forwarded to us by the State Clearinghouse concerning the Airport transmission line. The Negative Declaration was adopted by our Board at its June 18th meeting, and, because of a technicality, the required copies were submitted on July 17th thereby extending the thirty-day comment period. During the past two months the topic of growth as it related to this trans- mission line has been extensively discussed by the Board and individual Directors through the news media. The growth issue is of major concern to the Board mem- bers. However, a number of other issues must be considered in relationship to the total project in order to determine whether or not a full EIR is required. I believe our Board has considered the entire project and its total ramifica- tions in determining that a full EIR is not necessary. Some of the concerns and issues are as follows: 1. Increased fire protection, especially in the downtown area, is sig- nificant. This alone is a very positive aspect of the project. 2. The south side area of town is currently deficient in water source, and the excess gallons per minute from the Airport Well, above and beyond the contractual requirement for Dart Industries, can help alleviate that problem. 3. Whenever a line such as the magnitude of this one is installed, it is bound to create demand from the undeveloped acreage south of town. However, in an article I wrote for the Sierra Sun, a copy of which I am enclosing, I explain- ed that it is hard to differentiate the obligation to serve vs the demand that meeting that obligation may create. For example, when you put in the line to fulfill a contractual agreement to serve already approved lots and subdivisions, doesn't this create desire on the part of the developer with raw acreage to tap into that line? As I said in the article for the Sierra Sun, which came first, the chicken or the egg? 4. As a public utility district, we must provide a service to the people of our area. Persons have purchased lots, some day hoping to build on them. -1- • Roy Hampson, Executive Officer August 27, 1979 Page 2 On unimproved lots in approved subdivisions where there is electricity and water available, people have been paying standby charges for those two services. it is our District's responsibility to see to it that these people will have elec- tricity and water available when they decide to build. . We as a District have virtually no control over the approval of subdivisions. The Nevada County �. Planning Commission and Supervisors, over the past several years, have approved several subdivisions and projects in the area, and we become obligated to serve them. Tahoe Donner, the largest subdivision in our area - some 6,000 lots - was approved by the Supervisors nearly ten years ago. The purchase of the Airport Well and installation of the related transmission facilities are a fulfillment of a Dart - PUD contractual agreement to serve that subdivision with 4,000 gal- lons of water per minute maximum daily demand. 5. It is my understanding that there is a request currently before your agency to reopen the secondary treatment ponds here in Truckee. If such a request were approved, mightn't this create growth in the area which in turn would create a demand on the services we provide? 6. The growth issue, as I previously stated, has been considered by the Board. It is my feeling that any future taps on the Airport transmission line may indeed require the project developer to submit a full EIR even though the Martis Valley General Plan has already addressed the issues. I will be placing your recommendation on our agenda for the September 5, 1979, meeting for final resolution of the question. If you or your repre- sentative wish to attend, it would be most appreciated. Sincerely, 9-James A. Maass President CC: A. Milton Seymour Board of Directors Steven E. Grumer, Esq. Martin McDonough, Esq. Dan J. Cook, Civil Engineer Don Strand, Dart Industries George Edmondson, TTAD Enc. a/n - Sutton's Guest editorial Sierra Sun, 7/11/79 -2- 1 1j Xua v ��a d r+e T �r � � _, �.� ro..f :�.-- �- tit � ..r �•4 �� -' _ - . w , } .�.4 f � ` ��.x _ .j.,.�t y,'rtr-r �,5 ., •�= Y'x� L :. '�' I Yr .c'tn'7•*. �.h�'"y°;i.'�c��,J^b ^'�: lrr " 4• "xr . t.,,. ; w� �y�pJ: �i�� '. ..,,. ....a 5 ti �i• .x tt F.{..;t ,f. M Yt3 ♦ � e' i -i v �] �M`vR+t'�d�X"�'.�9•t Ay:�lt- �; � {I�1- MAN Wednesday,July 18,1979 e dit o ria I r w � r n, 1x Y �p■pr,���® T Uem h D !,--hl O � Y ■ c.�.n d f >. ,,ear Editor: developments in its service area — some several thousand line.However, this does not preclude that some future PUD a On June 18,the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner vacant lots.We now have a question of which came first,the Board ten,.20,years down the line will authorize additional , ?ublic Utility District, without a dissenting vote, adopted a chicken or the egg?As the district develops the system to serve, taps.This can only be dictated by community development and iegative declaration concerning the construction of a water doesn't this create more demand to develop? Or does the needs at a given time in the future.As a board,we cannot,and lansmission pipeline from the airport well to the town tank. demand to serve create the need for the district p to develop the should not,make those determinations now.So,when will the Since,then,there have been a number of questions raised system?It's an interesting problem,not likely to be resolved Water line no longer be a transmission line but a distribution line vhich I would like to address, easily. instead?That question is debatable and virtually impossible to v answer. First of all;just what is a negative declaration. Nonetheless, after review and discussion at two separate � In by-gone days, public and private entities used to build public meetings, the TDPUD board determined that a• The overall project by Dart Industries to fulfill its obligation r anything,almost anywhere,without regard for the project's negative declaration on the airport well transmission line was in to theTDPUD regarding the need for water[or Tahoe Donner is ,4 , affect on man and his environment.Now,before such major order,and by a 4-0 vote,approved it., probably one of the most significant things to hit Truckee in ?rojects can be approved,there are many questions that must Another e question deals with the difference between a tran recent history. x considered and answered. smission lie versus a.distribution line.Stated as simply as :r If the determination is such that the overall as cts of the g The water distribution line from the Airport through down : pe possible,a distribution line takes the water from storage to the town Truckee will be a system designed to last over 100 years.it project are positive and that the effect on man and his en- customers directly, whereas a transmission line will move will become the backbone of the Truckee water system,and will vironment will be minimal or can be easily mitigated,then it is water from one area,a well for example,to the storage system not cost the district or ratepayers anything to install. the board's responsibility to approve such a negative ready for distribution. Along with the project,Dart and the TDPUD have developed M1 ' Jeclaration which essentially says there are insufficient harm- The interesting question is, how do you tell the difference tut effects to warrant further study. between the two? It's difficult. A transmission line can also an agreement tying up most of the loose strings,including the The report answering the required questions about the airport serve to distribute wateraswell.While transporting water from dismantling standing conttro the Donner Lake pumping facility along versy in this community.This agreement has � fv well and pipeline was developed by the Tahoe Donner Public point A to point B,the line might be tapped to distribute water to been well Publicized during the past several weeks. yk Utility District's Engineer,Dan Cook.One question considered a specific area.Now,how does this relate to the airport well I am really pleased to see all of these events taking place,and in the report drew concern from the board: "Is the project transmission line? am roudtohavebeena art of them. " growth inducing?" The answer was "Yes." With additional The line.is basically a transmission line transporting water p p water available it is likely to encourage the development of from the airport well to the town tank for distribution to the James A.Maass , President of the Board more lots. Tahoe Donner Subdivision.The Truckee Donner Public Utility TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT However, the TDPUD is•obligated to serve all current District's current plans provide for only two eventual taps to the r. (Editor's note:A correction from ldlass,office shows that the vote on the negative declaration was actually 3.0.0.Three voted yes,one was absent and one abstained.) . abF Y A ,w!h�� - •"n�" t�'-".r, .. �*.' ]�ShlN �vi9'3e'•wC�v�;C! ty, � ..�� ! z- z �y z, .. l� ���i :;�,��sty < 1. .ws y-. -.r. _ ,r,;:� !~ ;•,.. ._ » .F 4.:.,(.. K.r_..j-> ._. .� ;�` -r > :r.:.. 1 �: _ cnc•r _a. 5.. -�,r ,:.. i.`,'YP'!:,hi! rr C r''1 +� - wr.wr { <7.. � ...?-' •.r-.':�,. �,.' .y 1r ''A,,�A,=:r�''p`�.,' v. .t _ r3'ret� ,,:..: - ^ •:3 ..� ,:•"• ?,. �cv-,k+ }�.tea,... :x?•�. 'xk:irsar^•.- ,.x:...a'Iti+inaxi �d�«L 4r a .-,•.c..> �.acsi:c:��z.vC:-�*i.«�=rarra�^•<H.vr�r.,.;r;,:-a[•,•.., � ,c 'E& r? "-FI '', ^.. .-:��«,�,...n•�,• 'S w �`4,•+K S'� rw��- _ '�'y'� ^JiX."AS*^S�r3vx3^-•.u+c-r "' .+w at.A.tc;.,�'3°' _. � :,:, ,rr'-_.,.a••� '. 7. ,.. r•-a",;tvc,rw.x�:t�' ..^ter-.�� r;,.irt+. .:.:= :' a,:�':-f! ;�"•w-w.b�r-eh0.Y-°' a ,.., r wA �a. 1 r ] 'snyn v+R`r ..�,T-0,v N'm1•�^' n3°.4'S;.. i - � -a'•>" �"'yp+k�` -�-'�'+' �"" ., .. .:ax. x- ry � ..a'°• >, a.x+��"r '�., �' :..s,e��,�+w. ,y,Y.l,,,,y.W,a � :-i'` '.-_-._... _ - m .,� -.d,. :.'. :.. .-Sx•-, L., �.f f.:. 's.„-�r;s"k�',. -..rr•- E ',�"'-r.nr: 'i a,... s.. ... «. ..? ,a•.y'.,: - s.F'C,' :::..:::.",a,'�F9L'.;:s:,'y,�.3'°. ' s".r y-"z, ._._..: :z.c ai:.•.,✓�.1$',"r.;.:s_.•"5, '4'� .c: 'X •a: '�`.:.,�+r_ s,a.,.�M >;`'7!r,.,-a"- �,n""'-..':, :..r :,:.`` :,i•-a:. -.r c; "`.x.'`t r.'v`s p„a,^ >.ra '"5 G.-r .i..^r-�+ _ ti ..v:4= :. r' -'•'Sri <: <:,.ry yob-'}e.:� r. ea+.:°7•x:.�.?' .lxa..;1.%'''4.. -w�--.._e'c�'!r. .-- i.:'iar•s-"'tee-:�',# t�b`�'�fiL''}` - zr s':g�". '. '�-^;... ^.c..;.. w : �;�r..�.�,. �� r',t ;Car.Tca'. .1`t" �i.-i:....r.,rLT,-. 7 ;; y'��bt.Y ea+�c - eHr- ea`yar�•.rrc �-.as• a ;."�.:. � .ec , .. n?.;.rF,;•.p .� Y ,' ...:A«'R,5aK �Z�,q�w+'•"'','�,yr•,a,rd..Atn•K••rx:'wr�t,'a,.�,...n.M•- ,ram asp' ..Yi�=v:h � .,y M �. i: vaw --rr.}` ,i�rv.w"a�ws- !-`-+,. �'�- •P•y..e Y....,,'n,�'J,'�����' "�,W,q.,+r. _ > ,•T.-. '.sr.u'�,� y#.� :. ,:,.,.�,•.: 5. :r,y.: ,,.. �..e - ,. c •xY .w2 ."„"Y'.. :- r.•--�'»i i � de. c .`+,war.•'d� 'rf W'ri•.Swu`r•n.+4• g+�.Ya'�y. F ., n.r, <�:.�•u;�,o�ww.a�;4�..?'?;c`".,r�z°n'clrr�. *^y;PL7`" sa'g,'�':`,x-. .,srr��. k _.. +,..u.5-fi?Ss.;��+W,h �T�,- .. «.r.: .; r� o-. ...•.rt�z... -r. '�+..v.,.. -�sr?'�i..,ti,.�'. ?ra�r :r ���.c::,. .: .F�" ar- .y._ -.,•.,S-n .i.;_ .; wA,y.,z4., s.r r ...•�'" ;_,y..... :.. �>< ',Z'`s; „, «,.,.: ^'•�t�s. t�y..r:; '-�" :' •'-,4' !kL^lV.. ...,� w. � ks.. -.,.- ....y -n•�n.,..:`�:` a. '-•^-:f„�•t*•rt,."# ,.. ,.-as•«,-,,a?��..�.,ei.�!...� . -v is ."'e-F I-•.. CsicR "�"-. '"`.""".""a' •.r�' -<r-ge,'ib,rr.'r,�-��,L .:a.w! ...y.,� ..." c n�3'Y'� � rr,:fir-;3. tt a.r•,•-»t: ,r. •h,- r' : 4:yYa . ++rw+v ; �.t. �`. .w.Kw>�-r+r:: ' "" �7- •tii.r','%ti �s .mrat'^,r..,« ..c_ +,-- _ ....-_. r ...x ..,.. ...•-t(,i ...i• .'x w,.,'Y .u.. f ., s y�.. .-:..rr•� >. 'ter`"-'•'"'f`.� •. ,.,. '.+,,;:.,z .'4 .,,u; .--,•-t#--S.t ..,..,,.` ^�' •.,��: -t:r4, ;'t". "Yr..,. ....rF .._. ,ai ac.�. i. � ,.,,..>�..x r.o+?.?S,-_ .. '�rK'mw..:zrt" .,e"" ",oa,r'?a':.:..'a . '..r - -vr. .4-='-•s s•'.. '" ". ,..a;.,.t�.7 ,,j,�t➢.'t,r, .'�4.: •li'� R`.t'vR'r .Y.,y,y...,.w{.. ,,G, .�•.r r 4 - „;�;'x'',�Yy"'"�,�.',:... .. . w�-^ ,y ,w.Q..:. :M.`x -Y'd.`�[>k. P, f S j :y'• .5<f<.`s:'•`' nS - ,_. ..-.i+Z h��C.,! :� •'H 4 _3,..Y Y• 4 ?+e -,� �` X•:.,•,.: ,. ->a...,,, ,.., ,..-,,. •::-.,,.. > 5.,,-v.; � tie., ..,.. -,. ^vi. k.Q�,r .:;�3.-75. �._,ic ... .�...'�„>._ 'rya'r .t--:« .f. -"r '�' rs ,�. vt --.-,.r.� .;� .:-a2x:.:7. ...:'�.'��.rr }•.:.:.....< r:?.{' > ..,.'r�'''-•y�. �t•'��•..{.+�.. �c',+�+...f, �Y,c_ 3 'Q!;�' �' .�� at..��' r�- _ rt.,'�a:'`.- �. �� wC+!.�^. y� a!G'�r. :4�'.Fs'i�c..ek, .a",,,�'k,. .t+- a.„ ",��.a*"C,r�a v'^. _•S.rq..7'.+G.t`,A-r '�' :� ..^y„•.<,ay'•�.�" ?: - aY:..y r-:,�: .I -�...tr _,.s µ ' "•�'�*+.c-p.a-•E-x-`•''-_, :�,:+��"�,�'s r._..£�-r,'+�u ."xwa: ,f°�-f�r - +�c..i�i�4�. f �r`.:�"�� 4w ar/.:S'ir.� � }:'."'�5 �'�•tT''` ic,--,:k'-sA'-r. },..1,�` . �-�`a •i�+sdu _ .... .. •� 0 0 .x. ... ' Rk. t •' ... Y b�tc.« .-nr.+ ..w s �«aaa>.. .. a-'x '�'tlpy;{'fK(a- mod.:' :. i,�. ,�,�..:x`':,r, ?'�!>',�i..r4s"�••.:at'p<y�r J.r''.... �':':fl.Jrsx'>h:. 'W,�C.-ue.w..�+.`.y.+►.Tt'n`, . 53���+`.=3 „ ar-..-.. ..., a- '.,.�.c cr:�r. .'r.','."eY,.'•w. .>wti:� ��,, •a•.F`,a^;<-.:..rvr`.7 l++QY i•'M�.wr...i",.i#,w.a .:<:at ::'i..i �y3 y A fxes;.�r. _:_;:,✓�`'es-zd^,� �y.'# K "a•« '�m �:,<.. ;,�.Y,;.✓,.�r�'•a„<:'. >,xy,..s '+a'L; ��''`"�'. &•�" �w'^'c.�.....:.<v�.-..t.-<aw- y.->w,;:.r;.^n.^., s:'� _ Y d�L/��� ., �-. .:.• ;.G-?',^»:�a5 :'+:.,,. .:r•=.�•''•`".��a.+. :<,�.•.:rnrac�;w'.'p .sx.,:`��i�•'��z7-�m,�'.s.T-p;�,�-.er .?,z,-.::i ,....,,.;'. s..;.a. �..h ce' <4j„�T';;3;'�:.�, ..,,i' a,..< c:_ .-,.�r_.r�yw2-:�;�i,K.,t t�rw-..far ,ram_.• 3• rq r`.7 -<!'m '4:sd,;..:i h°��a�'s �'�-:d��:a5'^+f�."'^"`gai�a... .,..x a i ^ ntr* the Tevhoe Domin V 3 U11 U tla: Since I've been in the midst of some of the controversies — the TDPUD will regard the low•vield Sanders Well and Geed S20.OD0: believe it can be resolved. Having left the June 18 Board meeting a "V" Iween the Truckee Donner Public Utility District and Dart the Airport Well,in conjunction with the operating\orthside — Dart will ay a sum for investigation and installation of g g t 11:30 m.,1 was not �,^•--`•' p 1 P g� P g P• iustries since I was first elected to the TDPUD in November Well,as fulfilling the District's requirement for three sources of cathodic protection to the Tahoe Donner water distribution present when the Board reconvened in public session an.l ap- MS = Y= u 13,I've been getting a lot of inquiries recently about what's water; syslem; proved the Negative Declaration on the Transmission L ne ing on. — the TDPUD will reimburse Dart approximately$24,000 — Dart will provide an update to the 1975 Groundwater Sometime after the Engineer's environmental assessment of since some of the news coverage has been confusing, this for the up-sizing of the West River Street water main which will Report; the project was submitted almost a month ago,the intended use tms tobe the best way to try to explain what's happening and not be the route used to transport water to Tahoe Donner; — THE DONNER LAKE INTAKE: Dart will remove the of the water line along Highway 267 has apparently changed make my position known toas many people as possible. — the TDPUD will proceed to record the deeds for water pumps from the pumphouse and fill the pit beneath them with The environmental assessment was related to a "trans. �+ w thins I've advocated for facilities in Tahoe Donner which were tendered b• Dart in concrete, also fillip approximately 40 feet of the pipeline mission" line to transport water to the already-approved (here's good reason to hope that two g } g pp p p long time may finally become realities: 11 a reasonable December, 1975: located within Dart's property lines; Dart will remove the Tahoe Donner Subdivision, with only two connections to the =• ;;; : solution by the TDPUD Board and Dart of the unsettled — both parties will allow the 51.6 million Letter of Credit, treatment plant within 3 years;and the TDPUD will release the existing system south of the River.Now it is apparently the '._ intent of Dart and the District to allow direct connections to that +blems related to the Tahoe Donner water facilities; and 2) which the 1973 Agreement provided to guarantee construction of performance bonds related to the Donner Lake facilities. Airport Well as an alternative to use of Donner Lake or the alternative Donner Creek facilities,to be transferred to the These are the major proposals which relate to old,familiar line to serve presently undeveloped properties in the Mariis nner Creek as the major soup Ce of water for the subdivision. Airport Well transmission facilities; problems between the District and Dart.Some of the provisions Valley. is;�k-�•ti; — Dart will contribute $32,000 twhich is related to the are probably still subject to further refinement by both parties Although it may mean a delay;I believe that the Board must ' THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT exemption of goo lots from the$40 per lot water fee allowed by before an agreement is finalized. establish that this line is indeed primarily a "transmission" g g facility to deliver water to Tahoe Donner as the environmental '41 BETWEEN THE TDPUD AND DART the 1970 Agreement)to the TDPUD Restricted Funds for Tahoe 1 had hoped that the negotiations would result in a settlement �.�;-:,.•. Donner Water S,vstem Improvements; of the State's suit against the District and Dart on the Donner assessment indicated,or it must require additional information "hecurrenl negotiations between theTDPUD Board and Dart — Dart will reimburse the TDPUD Restricted Funds for Lake Intake which dates back to 1973.I am,however, leased 8 B Pa usage and p on growth-inducing impacts related to the different usa ild resolve sc,ie inequities in previous agreements and ac• Tahoe Donner Water System Improvements approximately that Dart is now apparently agreeable to removing the pumps reconsider the adequacy of the Negative Declaration. ns,and could result in disposal of the Referendum Lawsuit $56,000 related to the 1970 construction of the water line up and pouring some concrete as evidence of their intent to 4�6 5� t , After the years of controversy which has swirled around the \orthu•oods Boulevard to the Donner Trail Tangy: abandon the Donner Lake source.!still have some reservations `?`;"".•��� atch et al versus TDPUD)which was filed in February 1976, ' lowing the district's acceptance of the Tahoe Donner water — Dart will reimburse the TDPUD for costs amounting to about the time intervals to perform these acts which have been Tahoe Donner project,it would be to the credit of both Dart and �tribution system and an unheeded Referendum Petition. S14,W0 for corrections and improvements which have been proposed. 1 hoe that these can be worked out to the com- the District.and a benefit to the entire community,if all these 3esides establishing some particulars about the airport well made to the Tahoe Donner water system telemetry.and con- munity's satisfaction. problems can be mutually resolved through the use of the ^" d the transmission facilities,. and some minor tribute S6,000 toward the purchase of a data-logger for the Airport Well and a new agreement. ousekeeping"items related to easements and odd parcels, telemetry system: THE AIRPORT%%'ELLTRA\SJIISSION LINE main provisions of the agreement being considered uy ooth — Dart will pay the actual cost for installation of altitude o t,_�� PAT SUTTO\ valves on two++•titer story T a tanks in Tahoe Donner.not to ex- Unfortunately.I believe there is a problem: I do, however. rucker *ties are that: g 1 i�e• �sprsp•• q ?'S-. s .wv }, r r�"a�'CiCo%1,+s��+'�'.1a�-`I"!'� � .i ,�•R. �; R4.' .,.. {S`�,.i'+a.,e 'T L wYa '�iq"a` ! _ :�:}j, '�i ?,.i A ir.N «w+i..MJ+..J M...wn. .....« ........«,.n..n.ny.u<........r+`r+.r--e..,.._..•... .. .m..r..__•. .._.._,.. ....w.w_w •....... .. .......,_ ... .. .. �... late fif TO: EC ice. V .E` D GOVERNOR'S OFFICE JJ i 'o E6..w .I OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESE_AiRj J \ � 1400 TENTH STREET JUL 2 J 1979 SACRAMENTO 95814COunsel ( A ry EDMUND G. BRO' r1,U:KEE DONNER P.U.D. ;^� Supt. / Foreman c ovEaµo By July 23, 1979 - Y Mr. Dan Cook Truckee Donner PUD P.O. Box 309 Truckee, CA 95734 Dear Mr. Cook: This is in response to our telephone conversation of July 20, 1979, regarding state review of the Negative Declaration for the Tahoe Donner Airport Transmission Main. As I mentioned, the California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency to complete the environmental review process prior to approving any project which may have a significant effect on the environment. This includes submitting environmental documents to the State Clearinghouse for state review when a state agency is a responsible agency (Section 15161 .5, CEQA Guidelines) . Failure to complete the environmental review process, including submission to the Clearinghouse, constitutes procedural noncompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and means no agency, lead or responsible, can legally approve the project. As I understand the situation , the Truckee Donner PUD has not submitted the Negative Declaration on the Tahoe Donner Airport Transmission Main to the State Clearinghouse for review. Apparently, this was done on the understanding that state review was not required. This is not the case. As you mentioned on the 20th, the Department of Transportation must issue an encroachment permit for the Airport Transmission Main project. This makes Caltrans a responsible agency for the project. Consequently, state review and submission of the EIR to the Clearinghouse is necessary before any decision can be made and the project proceed. Please submit ten (10) copies of the Negative Declaration on the Airport Transmission Main to: Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 lOth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Mr. .Dan Cook July 23, 1979 Page 2 Following their receipt, the Negative Declarations will be distributed to state agencies for review for a period of thirty (30) days. In compliance with Section 15161 .5(d) , the lead agency should extend the local review period for the Negative Declaration to conform with the state review period. If you have any questions , please contact me at (916) 445-0613. Sincerely, 3j-Z' Scott Warner SW/lmw cc: A. Milton Seymour Jim Maas 45 ,:+ma` s the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency shall* , a shorter period is approved be at least 45 by the State Clearinghouse. A review period fo r or an EIR does not require a halt in other planning + CC.1V ties related to a project. Planning should cont environmental evaluation. inue in conjunction with r 15160.5 Purpose of Review,o- comment procedures for environmental The legal IY ocumentequired preparation, review and `- citizens , all professional disciplines , and provide the opportunity for critically the environmental document and the man er1 inublcawhichetechn call data are used. 15161 . Review of" Environmental ImDaCC R . must develop pr eports procedures for reviewing EIR wh comments. ich Lead AgenciesPsubmitagon ies for them (b) Cities and counties should compile listings of other agencies , par- expertise local agencies , which have jurisdiction b expertise with respect to va..rious projects and p y law and/or special Listings should p a guide in determining which agencies esc should loca[be nconsulted with regard to a particular project. (e) Reviewers should possible focus on the sufficiency of the impacts upon the environment , ways in which adverse effects might be EIR in discussing minimized , and alternatives to the project , in light of the intent of the Act to provide decision-makers with useful information about such factors. Public agencies reviewing protects should explain the basis for their comments , and whenever possible , should submit data or references in support of such comments. (d) Upon completion of reviewing an EIR, it is suggested that reviewing agencies supply the Lead Agency with the name of a contact person who is available for lacer consultation should this prove necessary. 15161 .5. eview by State A en-; (a) EIRs and Negative Declarations Clearing.rouse , d by state agencies shall be submitted co the State g 1400 Tenth Street , Sacramento, California 95814. (b) The following environmental documents shall be submitted State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies : to the ( 1) Draft EIRs and Negative Declarations prepared b•T a state where such agency is a Lead o0 �_nc�. agency �Z) Draft EIR, and Neg ons prepared b.ative Dec1 arati agency where a State aoencv is a Resoonsici a public jurisdiction D_y law with respect Agenc%r or otherrise has to the project. 49 raft .Ss and Negative Deciarac_ons eoared r ,fir k rr pursuant to A v `: .e.deral �uzdeLines CT_t1e _0 C R, ?art 1500 , commencing •.rich Ssct'on 9 and arcs _ and II o Office of Xanazemenc and 3ud3ec r a A-9>. L Public agencies may send environmer. tal ?ocuments to tee State ` Claar_nghouse for review where a state y enc has special expertise Wit.-1 regard to the enviroamencal impacts iavolve,f. �. (d) when an EI3 is submitted to the State Clearinghouse , the review period sec by the Lead Agency shall be at Least as long as the period provided in the state review system operated by the State Clearinghouse . In exceocion- al circumstances , the State Clearinghouse may sec shorter review periods when requested by the Lead Agency_ 15161 . 6 . ?70iects of Statewide , Rec-icnal or Areawide Si2r.i = car.ce (a) Projects meeting the criteria is this section shall be deemed Co be of statewide , regional or areawide significance. =lFs or Negative Declarations prepared by any public agency on a project described in this section shall be submitted to the State Clearinghouse and should be submitted also tJ the appropriate metropolitan area council of governments for review and cctnment. (b) The Lead Agency shall decarmine that a Proposed pt roject is of ro ec state- vide , regional , or areauide significance if the 2 J meets any ar the following criteria: ( 1 ) A proposed local general plan , element , or amend.^enc thereof for which an EIR was prepared. ( 2) A project which would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of state or naCional air qualic-, standards including : (A) A. proposed. . =sidentia./ development of more than fOQ dwelling units.. CB) A proposed shopping center or business escab1 s ,en- a^.- ?loying more than 1 ,000 persons or encompassing wore ^,an 3(1-0,000 square feet of floor space. ` (C) A proposed cctnmercial oL___e buildin^ emo, oO in¢ -ore .nan I 1 , 000 persons or encompassing more than -30,Cooiscuare =_ of oor space. ?� CD) A Proposed hotel/mote_ we're -p^enc .. C _ _ c ? 1 _) A _ _JCse_ .CC2 n __ J �. =ndus Cr _n_ _ k J____..dC __ 'Ouse t tea.. f� :5 770e acres Z. _anc , Ja55 -'2 - - � ii :0 T` 0 ENGINEER'S REPORT TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT September 5, 1979 �-- Unfinished Business : Item 4: Attached as pages 3 through 7 to this Report are various Items for your consideration. , I have recommended that the Project 79-1 Water System Improvements be de- clared exempt from C.E.Q .A. and I have provided a Draft Resolution and the Notice of Filing that would effectuate the recommendation. Item 5 : Attached as page 8 to this report is a Draft Resolution for your consideration approving the previously submitted Plans, Specifications and GbAtract Documents for the 79-1 Water System Improvements . Attached also is an additional Notice to Contractors to be published two times in the local paper. Item 10: Enclosed as page 9 to this Report is the S .A.D. No. 5 Bid Summary. I recommend the Contract be awarded to Hood Corporation with a Proposal of $1,087,077. Enclosed as page 14 to this Report is a Draft Resolution recommending the Award to the Nevada County Board of Supervisors . Hood Corporation proposes to start next Spring and they also propose to use the redwood tank. The Contractor has requested that I ask you if for $10,000 extra you would want them to install an A.W.W.A. steel tank. Status Reports : A. Annexation into Placer County. Milt has the informat- ion on this Item. B. Donner Center. You have seen the letters from Steve . I looked over the Application for Service (TSD) and have determined that for the 36 Fixture Units proposed a 1-1/2" meter and service is required to prevent excessive pressure ! y drops . ;�� C . South Side Well No. 2 enclosed as page 15 through 17 is the Sheriff' s Investigation Report. Also enclosed as page 1S is a copy of the Contractors Obligations under the Specifications . Appropriate Notices have been made to the Contractor, Insurance Company and F.H.A. Several months will pass while the Insurance Companies and Lawyers hassle over responsibilities and reconstruction. D. Donner Heights Power Service - Enclosed as page 23 is a Plat showing the T.S .D. Easement locations . Enclosed as page 24 is a copy of the Easement and the wording. I would think it a small matter to convert the Easement to power use as well as sewerage use . 1 .4 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 79-1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT WATER FACILITIES Schedule A Installation of the Evergreen Circle Loop: The work proposed under Schedule A of the proposed improvements consists of the correction of the existing design and operational deficiency within the basic water distribution system of the Southeast sub-service area of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District . The work consists of placement of 580 linear feet of 8" diameter water,main, connecting the single tie-line from the Sierra Meadows Tank to the Sierra Meadows Grid distribution system. The work will result ; increased fire flows throughout the Sierra Meadows Grid, 're- duced pumping heads and lower cost of water supply. This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class III(2) of the District Guidelines . Schedule B, Reconstruction Existing Southside Booster: The work of reconstructing the existing booster station will entail the revisions to the existing piping arrangement and the addition of one booster pump and related appurtenances to the existing two (2) booster pumps . The reworking and booster pump addition will improve the reliability of the station reduce head loss and increase the yield to meet existing near term peak water demands . This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class III(2) of the District Guidelines . Schedule C , Ponderosa Palisade -Booster Pump Refit: The existing pumps will be replaced with pumps having more acceptance performance characteristics together with suitable controls and telemetry. The installation of new pumps will replace the worn out units, increasing the reliability, improve the system capabilities to meet existing and near term peak water demands This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class III(2) of the District Guidelines . Schedule D, Install Hospital Loop : The installation of the hospital loop will be a single water line to connect two existing unlooped water lines . The installation of this water main will complete a looped line around the Tahoe Forest Hospital and will improve the flow capabilities of the system to better provide for public safety and fire protection. This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class II.(1).(5) of the District Guidelines. Schedule E, Tonini Springs Improvements : F The Tonini. Springs Improvements will consist of the replacement and reconstruction of the existing fencing, storage tank drainage and redundant pumping facilities and the grading of upper surface drainage away from the Spring Area. The improvements at Tonini Springs will provide improved water conservation, the alleviation of a long existing problem of drainage flooring onto private property. and improved public safety. This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class 11 (4)'. & (5) of the District Guidelines . Schedule F, Install Pressure Reducing Valve and Check Valve for Prosser Heights Booster Pump: This work involves the reconstruction of existing District conveyance facilities by the installation of a pressure reducing valve and check valve . The installation of these ,._ valves does not substantially change the purpose or the capacity of the present existing system. When the booster pump is operating, high line pressures will be developed on the lower end of the system and by the installation of a pressure reducing valve, this pressure will be reduced to prevent damage to private property. This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3.5 Class II.(1) of the District Guidelines . Schedule G Install Basket Strainer at Soma Sierra Tank: The work consists of installing a basket strainer in front of the McGlashen Springs flow meter to lessen :maintenance problems . The flow meter is located in an existing District facility which supplies water from McGlashen Springs to the Soma Sierra Tank. The installation of the basket strainer will reduce maintenance time and expense by removing materials that clog the flow meter ^ and disrupt flow from McGlashen Springs to the Some Sierra Tank. This work is Categorical Exempt by Section 3 .5 Class I(2) of the District Guidelines . Based on this Preliminary Environmental Assessment of the work contained with the Proposed 79-1 Water System Improvement, I recommend that the entire Project Schedule A through G be granted Categorical Exemption in accordance with the District' s Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. ,41 J C ok R.C.E. 13062 'P.E. 5593 COOK ASS TE- P.E_ 2217 $� ti «` �, 09 ? a n�lne�ring Consultants W.R.S . 376 3� L'i3 g1� '+� ,yyam� Pvrk Avenue r tip' NOTICE OF FILING IL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION Responsible Agency: Contact: Phone: TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. A. Milton Seymour 587-3896 Address : City: County: Zip: lost Office Box 309 Truckee Nevada 95734 Project Title Area: Zoning 79-1 Water System Improvements N/A N/A Project Location Assessor's Parcel No. Various locations in the South Sub Service : Area and at other spots on the water- system See Map Attached Project Desciption Schedule A: Loop Tie between, S .M. Tank Tie and S .M. Grid Schedule B: Refit South Side Booster Pump Schedule C : Refit Ponderosa Booster Pump Schedule D: Construct Loop Tie at the Hospital Schedule E: Installation of redundancy pump, grading & overflow construction at the Tonini Springs Schedule F: Install P .R V. & check valve in the Prosser Heights Tie Line Schedule G: Install a Basket Strainer at head of the McGlashen Springs Meter Findings The Project will provide .greater reliability within the South Side Sub Service Area; -provide a higher degree of Public Health Safety and Welfare, accomplish water conservation, reduce energy consumption and reduce the operational manpower requirement of the Water System. L. A Preliminary Environmental Assessment has been prepared. 3 . The Project is Categorical Exempt from C.E .Q.A. per Section 3.5 Dist. Std. Da;e: Attest: County Clerk Filing Data Signed ames ass A. Milton Seymour Title President of the Board Clerk & General Mgr. Etr'S0Li7'C'TO\! ISO. l9- TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT DECLARING PROJECT 79-1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IS AN EXEMPT -ACTIVITY AS PROVIDED IN THE CofoQ.A. WHEREAS : There is a demonstrated operational need for the listed improvement as noted in the Engineer's Reports; and WHEREAS : The Project will provide greater reliability within the South Side Sub Service Area, provide a higher degree of Public, Health, Safety and Welfare, accomplish water conservation, reduce energy consumption and reduce the operational manpower requirement of the Water System; and WHEREAS : The District Staff has ccsnducted a Preliminary Environmental Assessment and found that each Schedule of the Proposed Improvements are exempt under the C .E.Q.A. as implemented by the District Guidelines; and WHEREAS : The District Guidelines provide for various Classes of Exemption into which the various Schedules of Work fall ': as recommended by the Engineer to wit: Schedule Exemption Class A Class III(2) B Class III(2) C Class III(2) D Class II(4) & (5) E Class II(1) & (5) F Class II(1) G Class I(2) NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the President is authorized to sign the Notice of Filing on behalf of the Truckee Donner Public. Utility District and he is hereby directed to file said Notice with the Nevada County Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District at the regularly schedules Board Meeting held within the District on the of September, 1979, by the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : t ABSENT: , TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC, UTILITYDISTRICT B Y James A Maass, President RESOLUTION 79 TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR PROJECT 79-1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND CALLING FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS WHEREAS , the Board authorized the preparation of Improvement Plans, �- Specifications and Contract Documents correcting the more pressing water system deficiencies, and; WHEREAS , Project 79-1 will provide greater reliability within the South Side Sub Service Area, provide a higher degree of Public, Health, Safety and Welfare, accomplish water conservation, reduce energy consumption and reduce the operational manpower requirement of the Water System, and; WHEREAS, the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents have been reviewed and are recommended by the District Staff. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents are hereby approved and further Construction Bids shall be opened October 5, 1979, at 4:00 P.M. P .D.S .T. in the District Board Room at which time they will read aloud. Be it further resolved the Manager is authorized and hereby directed to cause the publishing of the Advertisement for Bids two (2) times in the Sierra Sun prior to the Bid Opening. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District at the regularly scheduled Board Meeting: held within the District on the of September, 1979, by the following roll call vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: , TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT By James A. Maass, President ATTEST r-� rd A. Mzlton Seymour, Clerk ;c>f ,,the..Boa . 44) TRUCKEE SANITARY DISTRICT SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. S C August 28, 1979 Sw �s� C Ro"og ) Schedule A - Schedule B Schedule C Total Engineers Estimate '7�� �/U /o�2s� 237370 1./3C� 330 A & K Earthmovers r^ Branham & Assoc . Byars, H.M. CFB Const. Dalton Const. Ferrante Const . Gearhardt & Berm / ) ��7 2�U �2� 9Z/ 2SJ 290 �D jyl�i Henderson, Inc . �-�' Hood Corp. -�—�-� la �45' /�-�', 2$2 � /DD77 K.A.R_ Const. McGuire & Hester j. /rjf2��C�U /a3, /GG Z-�3 �6 lc L-fg2 D?� Pestana, Ernest Ramos, Joseph Roen, C .W. Valley Engineers ___/ J./26� 27o /¢2 37¢ ZB�, UGC) Valleycrest Land_ Walters Const . Wi'llden Const . Z 9S EXHIBIT ''A" 4 x. AMENDED ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF COST TRUCKEE SANITARY -DISTRICT SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 I . TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS, INCLUDING CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE $1,204,600.00 II. ESTIMATED ACQUISITION COSTS !^ 1. Payoff of 1911 Act Bonds in Armstrong Subdivision $28, 771. 29 2. Right-of-way acquisition 100,000.00 3. Richards Avenue Line Acquisition 3,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED ACQUISITION COSTS $ 132, 271.29 III. ROAD 1IAINTENANCE FUND DEPOSIT WITH COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 8 $ 12;400 .00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,349,271.29 IV. ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL EXPENSES 1. Engineering Fees $174,667.00 2 . Legal Fees 36,138. 00 3. Out-of-pocket exp. of Special Bond Counsel 1,500.00 4. Bond Printing, etc. 3,500:00 _ 5 . Plan Printing 1,554 .00 6 . Plan Checking Fees of Nevada Co. at r/ of Construction Plus Contingency 12,046 .00 7. County Filing Fee 175.00 8. County Administrative Overhead 15,492. 71 9 . Publication & Other Misc. Costs 2,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL EXPENSES $ 247,072. 71 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,596,344.00 COUNTY OF NEVADA Processing Fee @ 4% $ 61 853 . 76 $1,660,197. 76 CASH CONTRIBUTION TO CONSTRUCTION 183,500. 00 TOTAL ESTIT•IATED PROJECT COST LESS CASH CONTRIBUTION $1,476,697.76 BOND DISCOUNT 77, 720.93 TOTAL PROJECT COST INCLUDING BOND DISCOUNT $1,554,.418.69 Bond Reserve Fund $ 155 ,441. 87 TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF BOND ISSUE AND TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED *1. 709,860 .56 I. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Schedule A - Sewer System Improvements Constructio�� $6�39,205 .00 Const. Contingencies 69 ,925 .00 $769,130.00 Schedule B - Road Improvements Construction $143,282.00 Exist . Utility Relocation 85,000.00 Const . Contingencies 15 ,138.00 $166 ,420.00 Schedule C - Water System Improvements Construction $244,590 .00 Contingencies 243,460 .00 $269 ,050.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS , $1,204,600.00 INCLUDING CONTINGENCIES t3 TRUCKEE SANITARY DISTRICT SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 August 23, 1979 ASSESSMENT CALCULATION PROPORTIONATE PROJECT COSTS SCHEDULE A - Sewer System Improvements Construction Costs $ 769, 130.00 Right-of-Way Acquisition $ 76,200.00 Total Schedule A $ 845,330.00 SCHEDULE B - Road Improvements Construction Costs $ 166,420.00 Right-of-way Acquisition $ 7,100.00 Maintenance Funds $ 12,400.00 Total Schedule B $ 185 , 920.00 i-- SCHEDULE C - Water System Improvements Construction Costs $ 269,050.00 Right-of-way Acquisition $ 16 , 700.00 Total Schedule C $ 285, 750.00 1911 ACT BOND ACQUISITION $ 28, 771.29 RICHARDS AVENUE LINE ACQUISITION $ 3,500.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,349, 271.29 SUMMARY OF S .A.D. NO. 5 PROCEEDINGS Construction Bids Opened August 28, 1979 Protest Hearing September 11, 1979 Continued Protest Hearing (Roads) October 9, 1979 Bond Pre-Payment Hearing . October 15, 1979 to November 19, 1979 Court Validation Proceeding(Prop. 13) October 15 , 1979 to December 7, 1979 Receive Bond Bids December 17, 1979 Construction to Start Spring 1980 , Typical Assessments Sewer: $3,111.36 �- Water: $1,647 .67 Roads: $2,580.58 Y.. r 1 ' YI •.� � r{1 i i. S TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT RECOMMENDING AWARD OF S .A.D. NO. 5 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO HOOD CORPORATION WHEREAS , the Truckee Donner Public Utility District has previously approved the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents for the installation of Water System Improvements to . serve the Armstrong Sub-Service Area of the District which is also located within Sewer Assessment District No. 5, and; WHEREAS , the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District have previously entered into an Operational Agreement with the Board of Supervisors of Nevada County to operate, repair, maintain and replace the water system improvements to be constructed as a part and parcel of Sewer Assessment District No. 5 . , and; WHEREAS , the Construction Bids were publically opened August 28, 1979, in the Board of Supervisors Chambers and have been reviewed by the Staff of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District. NOW 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Truckee Donner Public Utility District recommends to the Nevada County Board of Supervisors that the construction contract, to construct water facilities as shown' on the improved construction plans for Sewer Assessment District No 5, be awarded to the Hood Corporation of Capitola, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Truckee Donner Public Utility District at the regularly scheduled Board Meeting held r ^ within the District on the of September, .1979, by the following roll call 'vote: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT By James A. Maass, President ATTEST: _ A_ Milton Seymour, Clerk of the Board S-0 -0-0_ JI NEVADA COU"<-.TY S:HERZ'=F-CORONER'S DEPARTMENT PEP CEO. CODE T O+•r `,JJMffr lx CRIME REPORT � >�0 -79 S/EG TION F- M CRIML TITLE r- ' qSe C z `�_-'iC=j AUEJ1 TION4L CRIMES ISF_E AUDITIONAL CRIME: VIC TIM IxE nURT 4rrA C1Ji_D!' . TTitJ� �. — LOCATION OF OCCU ,EC. P O Fx T F.o l (T,y/� LC rLD NEPO)a T$ occur x R F:t" NAl.+E %IAS T, F/R$ \Mt OCJ/t,1)� FIjR�M-NAftf fi ` v �`�C--���- �•-��/�J/i/L�/L_f-� — Ess :u:tl Su>c At7u Flt. VI[. Hair R ES. D RES ); AD S / '�-- A 0 CITY R Es. PHONE _ BEJs, PHONE r D• _ _ —/ �C>` �OJO LL/L_�'?ti�\��L/�•.(/,L%^Lf---C- LE_I_ .. r N Vic rrw<•s V NAML {LAST. ' UccEPAwr_ F , LHIC LE {Y EA N,MAFIUF,-rAOD! L,L/C.N•-R Icl: Sux nv HI• Wt. Hm' •( dlllla.l;Ilar A u C. U -Res. ADDRess -- -. a „- CrTV RE7.S,.PHONE UUS PHONE 11V5. OCCUPATION I VICTIM•-^.1 VEHICLE IV rAR-MAN- OF-.MOUE U.LIC N^. ADDITIONAL VIC TIMs FIE POR TING PF=r<SON ISC E AUDI TIONAL CRIME VICTIM REPORT.ATTACH EDI yr� ADLT, NAt.lk ILAS T, F11<S T, AIIUDLL"1 S �r j JVV. ARR E$TtO MiFxANL A WARNIN J ��YLS �_�NO Vt_S 4 U C D• "E5.! AUD rxLSS —___—_----____ S -� F SC PFION E$ IOAY NUMUt)t X IN BLOCKI H EJS,1 /NAME O HOCL IF lu Vl i` LEI -- =AC t- (^.E\ AGE jU1Fl rR,JA TG 11+— 1 I KL:I GIi Hql/t-- L:YL$ ' -- —__--1------ ----__ A UUI T,ON AL DLSC t:IPI'IONS ,I) TA Tl 00 (21 $CAlts (,JI 4 1F< rV l'L t•J1 FACIAL FLAIR ISI TL-k Tt - x 16/ $PE EGFI tTl COMR•t_E X:ON ADDII"ZONAL SUSPECTS (SLL ADDITIONAL SUSPECT VLHICLE V NO. LIC E:NSL Nt1MU E(i - STATE A C T U #ICPOFxT ATT'ACHLO) `_-------- M A r,lJ F R E rA f.zt f' LY I TOP COLOIx1 - nOTTOM H CFIn RJg C TLRI $TIGv (11 DAMAGE IEtO DY,WINDOWS,IN TI_HIOz., REPAIR::1. 121 Wa,L L-l.S (IAA G,CR'FxpM E,OVEf L:f, [3) INTEH10R UF..sC RIP rIUN t L - ADDITIONAL VLHICLE ISL:L ADDITIONAL SIDS F•ECT vEl-IICLL i CJE`^f+ItJE C—. T<F<IS TICS F ) i�JE_I.OFIT ATTACHEUI J�r�7�'S/A��/�� �.EMI� s Aln,�:,y FS.Ln W..�LriE or�ECNSc occEJRr.LD c.•E�C JxI[aE l C - /�C_- UT I::OU,PwzE rJ'r. THtC K. 'JL VrC I: OIJ F71-. - L US LO _ KE_-LIN-O/T !:, /t.IxUASS 'of"�ON U1. OF'FL.NSC------ ---- _P_✓"-•L�Vi�1,.�J_-2�J - - �_—•-. L-CT/s SAY C. E-CVLIA{tI T:US -/! ----- GI VE 'FIEF 5Yr40PSts ON ALL FLLON,F.S nn1U SEiG CRI11E.s ON rAISDEVI;_AN OH CRIMES, ------- URIEF SYNOPSIS STATEMLFIT All: [ .— fEGIN INV(_y TIGA TIOV ON CONTINUA TION REPORT, R COMPLETE REPORT IN THIS SPgC E, ORGJVe D F 1 ��O�J_�,.ram-eGC-� �!-��'�`- Soi�-;�c�oit/C'__�,%�• -1�C�—r��`� .EST 1-Y, •TF OL�:/ t� �. Y V/ / ��J���l_. �J� !/t/��- G'V -� � v,Y-� 1 V 4�V�V����`-��• /(-// 1,4 :,�,- L�i�s_%�� _� _ only�-,�. p r✓ � J r -Lo IVAI)d -�+(-�~I y r I Gam/ IJ(,•1�(+_.TIr+G O, r'ICI rz !� ' h_ NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER'S DEPARTMENT J? � R1=F>OItT NUM[i F_R —�-�`— CONTiNUATION. REPORT ET 0OR{GINAL REPORT [_l$L)fl>LEtAENTARy ElroL.Low-upCC Tt:LIST FIRSTOFELU CO>Al>LAINT/ tLIST FIRS VIC TIN pn1LY IF MORE THAN ONE. ;IA5r A5MEp 1ATE ARE A NO VFE 37 TN1�DC VL LOP YOVRINE/DATE � AiEl oNnn:ES;�i 4E-Tr F`sEgy�SE�N-CE . ' N OR5 rtTINLnT O!lSERVATO "15TNCG WP I p RRERORT M ESS 4OIR I VCEJ�j \SCf»TClaer Rp i V S/iTRHE O. FOR —�yC /:�,�. C���L t�C�. S�T�rv`�-°��_b�k��Tc'�" /ii/s�'1�5 �✓U _D�/� � . C22Z16r7c' f�L/<l �� 12G�f /r7 TT— Z'v/(s' '1G �SV%<->/�� 7-Z-e: �G sTICA- G of ICLLIs, y oaoGE ^O1V, nF+Ptt vING SVt RVISOrt A. NEVADA COUNTY S"=-R!FF-CORONIER'S DEPART/Y46ENT SPURTNUMOER Z J` CONITINUATION REPORT 26 70--2 7 . 00RIGINALREPORT ❑SUPPLEMENTARY ❑FOLLOW-UP CONNEC TEO REPOR 75 � �. 'fHORITY - ILIS•T FtHST OFF CFJSE ONLY IF MORE-THAN ONE) F'EL M190 COMFILAINANT/VICTIM ILIST FIRST VICTIM ON Y IF L MORE THAN O+JEI• L2/S/ir7 X -'l✓iG�c� -3�C>�i�lc�`�� ,�? f//F D . ;DEVELOP YOUR IN Y'cSH TION IN THE SE OV ENCE OF TIME AND DATE OCCUR REU: I.E.. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AT OR IN TH= IiL1E�OATE :AS-S s IATE ARE4 OF THE SCENE: PERTINENT O©5GRV4TION5: FINDING OF EVIDENCE--: AOVISEI-TENTS AND/OR REOVE573 FOR F 55157A NC E: TR ANSYOR 7A TION5:lY17N ESS CONTACTS. REPORT INFO"Mn 710N IN THE CHFi I OLOGI A C L ORDER IT OCCURRED. GC O O - �72c=� -5TIGA TING OI-"FTC EI'a.(/ / OAOGC OIV. APPR DYING SURE ISOR i ✓ . I.— , —. 1 -I .—,.IJ -1-11 11t� j_, Lfk��_ A. :_j -.. " ! P;,: 1i LV LSIC LiJn Lr d':.:- neck" ICC:L= 5 or. fails for a period of ten days after notice from the other party to designate an arbitrator hereunder, the arbitrator designated by the other 5� party shall Nave full power to' decide the dispute in the same manner as though a board of three arbitrators had been selected_ The referee or arbitrators shall decide which party shall pay the cost of referral or arbitration, and final payment to the Contractor shall not be made until the full decision of the referee or arbitrators has been rendered. 26 PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY_ The Contractor shall continuously maintain adequate protection of all his work- and materials from damage or theft and shall protect the Owner's property and all adjacent property from injury or loss arising in connection- with activities under the Contract_ The Contractor shall make good. any such damage, injury, or loss, except such as may be directly due to errors in the contract documents 'or such as may be caused by agents or employees of the Owner. - The Contractor shall take, use, provide, and maintain all necessary pre-cautions, safeguards, and protection to prevent accidents, or injury to Persons or pr^party on, about, or adjacent to the site of the Work. "The Contractor shall post danger signs t:arning against any hazards created by the Llcr:c<- Y_> shal 1 designate a responsible. member of his organization on tfr ;:c,-tk, .-INc.se duty shall be the prevention of accidents,- and the name of person so designated shall be reported to the Representative and 01-.ner t no , an c-mercy ncy affecting the safety of life, or of the Work -r,j•::i:: g pr,p er ty, the Contractor-, without special instruction or. ,DLIL:%ori =.;:ien fr:xn the Representative or Owner, is Hereby permitted tO act, aL ,.is c:iscretion, to prevent such threatened loss or injury, and he must take such action if so instructed or authorized by the. Representative or Owner. The Ccntractor shall also protect adjacent property as required by Ia r in order to protect the lives and health of his employees under th.e contract, the Contractor shall comply with all pertinent provisions 'of the "Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction" issued ,by the Associated General Contractors of Amncrica, Inc., and shall maintain an accurate record of all cases of death, occupational disease, and injury requiring medical' attention. or causing loss of time from work, arising out of and in the course of employment or work under the contract. The Contractor alone shall be responsible for the safety, efficiency, and adequacy of his plant, appliances, and methods, and for any damage which may result from their failure or their improper construction, maintenance or " operation. 27. USE OF LAND OF O-INER BY CONERACTOR_ ' The Owner shall provide tha land upon t•rhi ch the Work is to be clone, and wi 1 i , so far as is convenient, permit the Contractor to use as much of the land as is required for the erection of temporary construction facilities and storage of materials, together with the right of access to same, but beyond this, the Contractor shall provic4;,. at his cost and expense, any additional land required_ 28. LIENS OR CLANriS_ If at any tima there shall be evidence of any lien or claim for- which the Owner mi cht become liable and t-:hi ch is chargeable to the Contractor, the C:wner shall have the right to retain out of any payr•.•ent then due or thereafter to become cue, an amount sufficient for complete 5 15, Page VI-11 Specifications. All work done and all materials furnished shall be subject to his inspection and approval . If any work, should be covered up without approval or consent of the Representative, it must, if required by the Representative, be uncovered for examination at the Contractor's expense. Reexamination of questioned ti-:ork may be ordered by the Representative and if. so ordered, the work must be uncovered by the Contractor. If such work be found in accordance with the Contract, the Owner shall pay the cost of reexamination -and replacement. If such work be found not in- accordance with the Contract, the Contractor shall pay such cost unless he shall show that the defect in thz work %-pas caused by another contractor, and .in:that event, ' the C;rner shall pay such cost. The inspection of the Work shall not relieve the Contractor of any of his obligations to fulfill his contract as prescribed,` and defective % ork shall . be rnade good and unsuitable materials.,shal l be rejected, r-Ot% i thstarncdi ng that such defective work and materials have been previously overloo!<ed and ' accepted on estimates for payrlent_ All work shall" be tested to the . satisfaction of the Representative before acceptance t:o %-.ork steal I be done at 'ni 7 rt without the prior wri tten approval of the Representative. 32. DEFECTIVE WORK OR MATERIAL. The Contractor shall promptly remove frcn thc: premises all work and materials condemned by.the Representative as failing i to conform to the Contract, whether incorporated or not, and the Contractor j -execute his o,.:n work in accordance with the. shall promptly replace and re ' Contract and without expense to the Owner and shall bear the expense of. raking good all %rork of of::er contractors destroyed or damaged by such removal or replacement. the Contractor does not re�r_->ve such condemned work or materials within a reasonable time after notice, the Olaner may remove them and store the m=!terials at the expense of the Contractor. li the Contractor does not pay the expenses of. such rem.-oval within 10 days' time after such removal , the Ca-;.er riay, upon thirty days' written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale -and shall account for the net proceeds thereof after dcducting all the costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor. 33• OTHER CONTRACTS- The &,ner may atirard other contracts_ The Contractor shall fully cooperate with such other contractors and carefully fit his own work tc• that provided under oilier contracts as may be directed by. the act which Sri I1 Repre entat-�ve. The Contractor shall be liable for any other Contractor cue or I nter•fere with the performance of ~pork by any 314. i;,;?_F2 S RIGHTTfl -f�+1�E 0`-rE THE WORK. the Contractor s;culd be adjuddea a b "-rupt or if he should ma:<e a general assignment for the benefit of hi•> creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed to tae over his affairs he �[:oul:i fai 1 to prosecute the blor-k with th due diligence and carp or the :- ,r_s d i n �.ccordancc Sri th his ti:ork sch�'dule and the time limits set forty i:: r:r� �ntract Documents, or if he should fail to substantially perfcrrr: une th 1 provisions of the Contract, the Owner nay serve %-rri tten - CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE certificate issued to _ Name and address of Insured Truckee Donner Public Utility District C. W. Roen Construction Co. P.O. Box 309 P. 0. Box 4 Truckee, CA 95734 Danville, CA 94526 I t t . erils insured against $ 500 deductible, applying to Fire and Lightning ❑ Sprinkler Leakage all perils �.. Extended Coverage ® All Risk including ] Vandalism & Malicious Mischief ❑ flood & excludin'J quake F xation of property covered I (1> All Work included 'in contract: Water Source Augmentation and Elimination i of System Losses - Project 77-1, Schedules B, C, & D l _ . Policy 4 Insurer Term Coverage & Amount of Number f From To Locations Insurance_ SPF312907 Atlas Assurance Co. Ltd 6/5/78 9/13/78 All Risk $133,780. _ �- Builders Risk F Legend: SP—Specific insurance B —Building(s) 1—Location#1 ,.-. BL—Blanket insurance BE-Building(s) & Equipment 2—Location #2 R —Reporting form—amount of ins. EL —Equipment 3—Location w3 shown is limit of liability for all ES —Equipment & Stock 4—Location #4 contributinjr insurance S —Stock A—All locations �] Z'Iortgagee Clause (requires 10 day written notice of cancellation to mortgagee) ❑ Lenders Loss Payable Endorsement (policy continues in force 10 days after written notice of cancellation is received by lender) ❑ Other payee clause (copy attached to this Certificate) Policies contain clause indicated above. Loss, if any, payable to the party to whom this Certificate is issued, unless otherwise noted below. The miner, Truckee Donner Public Utility District, and the engineer, Cook & Associates are named as additional insureds . I certify that the above described policies exist and cover only in accordance Nvith the policy terms. ol rT ` y June 6, 1978 � ram: FJ tTiTLEI. tDATE) )AMES L. ST015�9XU R ;`� t. lr THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 .` (FIRM AND.ADDRESS) f �� ,,,,,I IS CERTIFICATE IS FOR INFORMXFION ONLY; IT IS NOT A CONTRACT OF INSURANCE BUT � s TESTS THAT A POLICY AS NUMBERED HEREIN, AND AS.IT STANDS AT THE.bkTa OF THIS xTIFICATE. HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE INSURER. ' ` � U.12 i'sTI. f -rr f3F li,'.`i1? Truckee Donner Public Utility District Truckee, CA 95734 Tts;S IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence of instiri nce, as of L4L-date of execution hereof with Har;Zor fnsoir ' ce r^'patty, as describe%i below: e of Assured- C-11. Rozn Const�uc-ti o-=t cc). ress aE AsSLted: P- p Bow. E, Dartvz_ll ,` Cj- 94-926 • Lit ation of Pisk: Job. biodifIc.-tlons lgater Collection Sys-tem' - d of InsurWce: CO I_rL WS1VE GEW P-A-L L 1EIZrITY i.n.clucUng corzt�actu 3. `ls abz?s ty as p^r polacy t=t=_z�,ts• and caaldit .oz?s Policy No- 131107- period froc°t 7/l/77 to : r :tts: Bodily l^j.ury each parson S 300, 000 �! each acci d-n t S 3 0 0, 0 0 0 aggregate 3.0 Property Damage each accident S 10 0, fl 0 0 aggregat ;�1Q ,r 0 0 Q. d of frnsurance:' COM-'P.EY-L-ZSIVE AUTO21jOB?-IaE LIABzLI_TY _ Policy No_131107 period fro 7/1/77 to m 7f1/75+,• s: Bodily Injury each person . 5100, 0QQ each accident 5300, 000 aggregate -S r_o angli.eab3.e Property Damage__each accident .•.5100r000 aggregate-. ' _ -- - rio;~.api-. l icwble :1 o, Ins:-urance. Uii3P.Ei,r.� F'YCESS LTAB--1 L1 Y Policy UJo_13111 7 period from 7/1/77 to..7/1/7a = rts: liP TO $3, 000, 000 in Excess o= Primary limits or I,iab .lity 1.t rention>d Potrcy ba caacelt_d, vssiLnad or ehan�ed by the und_rsigned in such manner as to a?:_ct thi s Ceaitrcab_,sys tivitJ enC_avar to;r. _n r ae to the above na^ed ho!1zr eJ this Cerir:rcata;but fai?a:e to give scch notice shalt iiny�se no ob?igaiion or IiaJitity oS a y 7cin3 a pen tires u u'�r- a! Oakland, Ca?ifoiriia this. 20.th day of- March, 1978LC SWETT._8CRAVVF-O RD' BY _.. COOK AS30C?ATES C 0M REN SATI ON P.O.BOX 807,SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 94101 R E C'E 1 V E 1 N S tJ FR A N C E - u APR '7s CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE April 4, 1978 Cook Associates PR W-CT 2060 Park Ave. — Oroville, Ca. 95965 Attn: Dan J. Cook This is to certify tnat we have issued a valid NNorkers'Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the California Insuranca Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated. This policy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon ten days'advance written notice to the employer. we will also give you TEN days'advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration 395388-78 (4---1-78/4-1-79) JOB: Proj.. 77-1, Truckee Donner Public Utility Dist. Rater Source Augmentation & Elimination of cLy ss)e �j EMPLOYER � .r- R 51DENT - C.14. Roen Construction Co. P.O. Box 4 Danville, Ca. 94526 sh SCIF FOR--262A (REV_2-76)--'• •• - - - x _ i I )4 S ,j 17 p 1 Aria Cady ! ' 77�' 029' c.G9°y5 ✓� 29 �.1257yx�g8� 14U 3 (Ip Q'Iw E' 11• N�•1S'E. 16 1 Z 2a z l� 15 ' z 0 ch,5 88•� `°`, 0.91 �210 u 9 Vie' 8 wg. ii 11 3' J 3j 1 O 9 )ZA . i• J. �E.6 I 7 �a.69 51V- ti ' �� ) 1213G o,�� �I 138 0. 5� O.IA 4 {I Qa `' dAa'1 �� 7 17 O t�. 1 8 `,. �c d1.92 3 '.. 155 �•zo ,[g3•ss fir. 0 �- 13 5 l.d� O oz Q 10 99.38 N 6° Pl•SYY�9.6 i�yQ 3.62 12 '`A43j• ai.p�• w 6 SUB 1-125 ,�� � 0 12 N 332 D ,349 i8 �• y/ j4 rzz: 31'1 27L1g 5 g.86000'w, 6 10 �, , 77 SU8.1-125 610 n.a 1 5 13i tlg � 11_% 11 a 1�` CI1°S R.63o' ` 11 J7R69' �/ { I dG' .pSGI�G q8 1 0. 269.E°' �1 q0 y pp' m r,�.51 pd29Y11� r,4 ,05 11� 7p2' SU8.1-125 t N.86 00'f., 1.. 150 , �,512 181 t.5 f r>r 15 i ?v 164 1' 1j1g'G� .33 gx/s; `� c F. 77 178°�6 N ?c 1 5 10.10�' R6ad� ChSi Q'510 s 51 d ' s �w. y .�.� J;79°461+ 16 ssia cn�S ?3' lvate 5 n 14 I9 Cry 10' ( P1 10'E' S� 13 a; 17 0' 5.00' 2.5 !i„?0°1 11' 60' 4 p6�, 3OQ�' 18 5°,71' ;z PIONEER LO �G•�; ' Chs w� y 5 58' U8.1 q 1 p 38' .a;F.. 7B 1 ,6 �• 6 .5i R>b 5°51 0 9 51 1 °51, u, 10 e1 5E 1 50 5 21 �� 6a.51' 50;51 0 1 a i� fao lyi 186 101,OZ 61 FD . IJ u, 3 rl b rn 187 -° a or iesA 335 � 2 �18� 1848 184k W w as L� �, pK ct, ,69. 3t , P5S t+'.t �; s�.r �r.r�{. r•�..st(�. c7C.K z'�rl,, i the i�DA COJt:7Y, CAL(FORNIA C-l',A 'T OF EA"rT1E,,1• FEE; j-, , i EASEMENTh10 . 3-3M-156 1 T1- ( S I NDC:•:TUR : nade th i s 17th day of January Z972 by and 2 be t-ecn R XRXXk Chiye Watanabe i (hereinafter cal Jcc! ! r emu 1 grantors) and the TRhf�rEE cr "' ITncv ntSTnlCf h( ereinafter called ` h Is rt rantee) r at the � ranto — ' — -- T Th —" rs have Rranted ; and by these presents do grant y; 1 unto ! rantee , its successors and ass is for. respective pur uses P hereinafter set forth , a perpetual easement on , over , under and i,- - -� � across a1 1 "= thoso portions of the he reinafter described real .- ... %:. fir nr•opert - y , for to ^urposc of construcfiion , naintaininry and. oQer- 11 atinn a sewer line and a�.r3urtenant faci ? f ities , together With the i2 ric-ht of ingress and enre ss for men wi tti tools and/or equ..iPment 13 required for the repair , maintenance and/or oneration of said 11r sewor line and appurtenant facilities . 15 A portion of Sec 'ion 13, T17N, R15E, M.D.M_ - State of California> , County of Nevada, l . � 7 The Easterly to feet of Lot 12 of Donner Heights - Subdivision as shown on the plat thereof, recorded in Book 1 of Maps at .Page 125, Nevada County Records . 1 � 2-0 u1 r.*t =F) 23 'L 'D 24 0 l �5 2 47 27