Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 Non Conforming water accounts Agenda Item # 14 r4LPublic Utl WORKSHOP To: Board of Directors From: Neil Kaufman Date: September 02, 2009 Subject: Discussion of Non-Conforming Water Accounts 1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD It involves the upcoming transition from flat rate billing to volume based billing. 2. HISTORY AB 2572 requires that the District begin reading the water meters installed since 1992 and commence billing on a volumetric basis by January 1, 2010. AB 2572 also requires that all connections be equipped with water meters and billed on a volumetric basis by January 1, 2025. In preparation for the implementation of metered billing, the Water Department and Administrative Services have reviewed the status of the existing water system customers. As of December 31, 2008 there were 11,814 residential accounts and 680 commercial accounts. During this review, a number of non-conforming situations have been identified. This issue was previously discussed at a Board workshop in May 2009. 3. NEW INFORMATION Non-conforming water services are those customers that are not in compliance with current practices regarding metering as described in the recently revised Title 6 of the District code. For the most part, these customers were in compliance with District requirements at the time the service was installed. These situations will be discussed below generically in order to protect privileged customer information. A. Multiple Accounts in a Single Structure - There are a number of situations where a single structure such as a duplex, fourplex or mixed-use is fed by a single service line, but each unit receives a separate bill for water service. In some cases, the units are under common ownership, in others they are owned by separate parties. The physical piping is arranged such that the individual units cannot be easily separated and that an individual customer cannot be disconnected for non-payment. B. Single-Family Residential in Multiple Structures - There are a few of situations where a group of separate single-family residential structures is fed by a single water pipe, but each residential structure receives a separate bill for water service. An example would be a mobile home park where each mobile home receives a separate bill for water service. In some cases, the ownership and maintenance responsibility of the exterior piping may be unclear. C. Unbilled Services - There are few properties where a separate connection was installed for irrigation purposes, but a bill for service is not being issued. D. Unmetered Outdoor Usage - There is at least one situation where the meter is located inside the building but irrigation and other outdoor usage occurs before the meter. E. Other Non-Conforming Accounts - There are a number of other unique situations that will need to be dealt with on an individual basis. Proposed Solutions Ideally, the all of the non-conforming situations should be brought into compliance with current practices. However, that could require reconstruction of the internal and external plumbing of the structure to provide separate water service to individual units. Such an effort could be quite expensive and there will undoubtedly be disagreement regarding who is financially responsible, the property owner or the District. As an alternative, it will often be possible to install a master meter for the property, or relocate an existing meter to a more appropriate location. This would require that an acceptable party such as the property owner or a homeowner's association, exist to be financially responsible for the monthly billings. This arrangement could potentially require the modification of lease agreements between tenants and owners. There may also be a revenue impact to the District as well. Under the current water rate structure, the Water Department receives more revenue for four individual residential accounts than it would for a single master metered account with a slightly larger meter. A third and least desirable option would be the creation of a "Non-Conforming Bulk Rate" for water service. Considering the customer's usage would be unknown, the following rate methodology is proposed: "The customer shall be charged a monthly bill for service based the base charge, commodity charge and pump zone charge corresponding to that customers location and class (residential or commercial). For determining the commodity charge and pump zone charge the customer shall be charged a volume equal the 90t" percentile of usage for all customers with the same customer class and meter size. This determination of the 90th percentile shall occur annually in January and shall be based upon the metered usage data for the prior calendar year." Given the current workload and priorities for 2009, it is expected that the Water Department will begin to address these non-conforming accounts in 2010. These customers would continue to receive the appropriate monthly bill for an un-metered service in the interim. 4. FISCAL IMPACT There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this workshop. It is expected that the number of customers that fall into the Non-Conforming Bulk Rate will be small. 5. RECOMMENDATION Receive this report and provide comment. Ed Taylor Michael D. Holley Water Utility Manager General Manager