HomeMy WebLinkAbout15 2011 and Projected 2012 Conservation Programs Agenda Item # 15 TRUCKEE DONNER
Public Utility District
WORKSHOP
To: Board of Directors
From: Steven Poncelet
Date: March 07, 2012
Subject: Review of the 2011 and Projected 2012 Conservation Programs
1. WHY THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE BOARD
This workshop item is before the Board to provide a year-end review of the FY11
Conservation Department programs and to present a projected plan for the FY12
Conservation Department programs.
2. HISTORY
The District has been investing in new conservation programs and capacity while
continuing to deliver our robust stable of energy and water saving programs. The
current conservation energy and water programs can be found on our website at
vwvw.tdpud.org. As verified and reported through our Evaluation, Measurement, &
Verification (EM&V) efforts, the District has a successful track record of very cost-
effective programs. The District has expanded beyond traditional rebate programs and
now also offers give-a-way and direct-install programs. The primary goal of the
District's conservation programs remain to maximize return on equity for our
customers and to ensure that all of our customer segments have the opportunity to
participate in our programs. Staff has been working to deliver, and optimize, existing
programs and to develop and bring to our customers new water and energy savings
programs.
3. NEW INFORMATION
FY11 performance of the Conservation Department programs was on budget and met
expectations. The independent, outside EM&V work is largely completed and the
results for the 2011 energy conservation programs are very impressive: Net annual
savings of 3,400,293 kWh, Net lifecycle savings of 30,824,481 kWh, and a TRC of
2.81 (see Attachment 1). These results will again put the District in the top of
California utilities for both energy savings and cost-effectiveness. To put these
numbers in perspective, the District's 2011 energy conservation programs resulted in
a first-year energy savings of over 2.2% of gross electric sales at a fully loaded cost of
around $0.031/kWh. The benefits include cost savings to the District and money in
our customer's pockets.
The 2011 results are slightly down from previous year's reflecting the 'diminishing
returns nature of energy and water conservation. The impact of the program in 2011
(over 2.2% first year savings, around $0.031/kwh loaded cost) remain very strong, but
were impacted by the following factors: change in the E3 model's avoided cost
assumption (this lowered TRC for all utilities); the inclusion of water programs in this
year's EM&V (helped electrical savings but hurt overall electrical cost-effectiveness);
and the continued decline in the number of CFL 12-packs that we hand out as we
continue to saturate this measure (13W CFL's have dominated both our energy
savings and cost-effectiveness in the past). Charts showing first-year kWh savings
and cost-effectiveness (TRC)for the last four years are attached (see Attachment 2).
In terms of specific 2011 energy conservation program results (2010 #'s for
comparison,):
• Commercial Rebates: 26 (38);
• Residential Rebates: 676 (768};
• Energy Savings Program Customers Served: 85
• Residential Energy Survey Customers Served: 279 (48);
• Holiday Light Exchange Customers Served: 700 (684};
• Residential Green Partners Customers Served: 689
• Business Green Partners Customers Served: 80 (59);
• Keep Your Cool Customers Served: 10 (36); and
• Screw-in CFL's Distributed: --51,000 (--60,000)
In terms of new program development for energy conservation in 2011, the Green
Schools Program/Trashion Show effort remains extremely popular with the District
distributing 1,800 conservation kits to every elementary and middle school student in
our territory. The educational component and the visibility within the community of this
new program were even more impressive. The next round of Neighborhood Resource
Mobilization 'block parties' was also very successful with solid events in the Prosser
Lakeview and greater Sierra Meadows neighborhoods. The Residential Energy
Savings (RES) Program expanded dramatically and customer response remains very
positive. Staff continues to hand out free compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFL's) and,
as we have started to saturate the 12-pack spiral market, staff is moving towards other
types of CFL's. New LED lighting programs are beginning to take shape but the
technology is still developing across all applications.
In terms of specific 2011 water conservation program results (2010 #'s for
comparison):
• Toilet Rebate Customers: 149 customers, over 370 toilets (165 customers,
over 270 toilets);
• Toilet Exchange Customers: 236 customers, over 420 toilets (12 customers,
over 15 toilets);
• Customer Leak Repair Rebates: 90 (42);
• Combined ESPIRES Customers Served: 364
• Low-Flow Showerhead Distributed: --2,250 (--3,350);
• Low-Flow Sink Aerators Distributed: ~2,800 (--4,000); and
• Low-Flow Hose Spray Nozzels Distributed: --4,200 (0)
In terms of new program development for water conservation in 2011, the District
introduced TDPUD Water Day which included an on-site toilet exchange, conservation
garden tours, and other water savings measures and information. Staff continued to
promote the conservation garden, including the interpretive signage and web-based
resource, with the Lake of the Sky Garden Tour and other events. The Customer
Water Leak Repair Rebate program is on-going and customer response has picked
up. Staff expanded dramatically the new Water Efficient Toilet Rebate Program and
. . + v
the new toilet exchange program towards with strong customer participation. The
commercial Smart Water Controller Program, that was started in FY09, is on-going
and staff is reviewing the water-savings data to determine if the program should be
continued. Over 1,800 low-flow hose spray nozzles were distributed to school kids
through the 'Trashion Shows'.
The proposed FY12 Conservation programs along with a break-out of funding and
projected activity levels is included as Attachment 3. The District currently has a very
comprehensive stable of programs and Staff will continue to implement and optimize
the existing programs.
Potential changes to existing energy programs include responding to the work at the
Federal level to ban the sale of incandescent screw-in light bulbs (starting with 100W
incandescents in 2012) and the ban in July of 2010 on the manufacture of T12
fluorescent tubes and magnetic ballasts for wired-in lighting. Staff is proposing
phasing out commercial lighting rebates for T12's by June 30, 2012 with a 'last-
chance' blitz to try and incent customers to upgrade to more efficiency lighting.
New energy program development is proposed to focus on improving our appliance
rebate program by lowering the Energy Star rebate to $50-75 and increasing the
rebate for more efficient models (CEE Tiers 1-3 to $1004150) and introducing a
residential rebate for screw-in LED light bulbs ($5/bulb). The District will continue to
track the efficiency work on plug-in electronics (TV's, computers, games, etc.) along
with optimizing our efforts on ESP and RES. Based on solid results, it is anticipated
that the neighborhood block party concept will continue.
New water conservation program development is proposed to include an incremental
incentive to purchase 1.28 gpf or dual-flush high-efficiency toilets ($25 additional over
standard $100 rebate/exchange) and an incremental incentive to purchase high-
efficiency clothes washers ($25-$50 water rebate for CEE Tiers 2-3 over applicable
energy rebate). The District will continue to develop and promote the Patricia S.
Sutton Conservation Garden and web-based resource along with the Customer Leak
Repair Rebate voaram.
4. FISCAL IMPACT
The FY12 budget includes funding for the District's energy and water conservation
programs. There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this workshop item.
5. RECOMMENDATION
Receive this report and provide feedback and direction to staff.
s
Steven Poncelet Michael D. Holley
Public Information & Conservation Manager General Manager
Attachment 2
Net Annual kWh Savings
5,000100041500,000 i 41000'r000 3,5001000
31000,000
21500,000
21000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500POOO F— EM
0 2008 2009 2010 2011
Total Resource Cost (TRC)
8 ---
7
6
5 --
4 -
3 - —
2
1
0 2008 2009 2010 2011
Projected 2012 Conservation Programs
Attachment 3
2012 ENERGY PROGRAMS: Program Budgets Projected
(Proposed) Activity Units
Residential CFLs $11000 500 CFL Bulbs
Clothes Washers $20,000 200 Clothes Washers
Dishwashers $15,000 150 Dishwashers
Refrigerator/Freezers $20,000 200 RefriglFreezers
Refrigerator Recycling $15,000 100 RefriglFreezers
Building Envelope Testing $1,500 20 Tests
Duct System Testing $19500 20 Tests
Building Envelope Mitigation $2,500 10 Mitigations
Duct System Mitigation $2,500 10 Mitigations
Rebates Other $10,000
Commercial Projects $757000 20 Businesses
Ground Source Heat Pumps $3,000 1 GSHPs
Electric Water Heating/Solar $2,000 10 Water Heaters
Low-Income/ESP 1 $55,000 200 Participants
Green Schools Program $7,500 11800 Conservation Kits/Kids
Kwh Portable Meter Loan $500 100 Participants
Residential Energy Survey/RES $18,750 250 Participants
Business Green Partners $20,000 100 Businesses
Keep Your Cool $60,000 50 Businesses
Business LED Pilot/Others &MR-16 $20,000 11250 LED Lamps
LED Business Accent Lighting $0 100 Accent Bulbs
LED Exit Sign Direct Install $17000 25 LED Exit Signs
Residential Green Partners/Big 6 $40,000 10,000 CFL Bulbs
Green Building Program $2,500 2 Workshop Training
R&D $2,500 DEED & Pilots
Neighborhood Block Party $2,500 1 of Events
Million CFLs $37,500 30,000 CFL Bulbs
LED Light Swap $305000 750 Participants
EM&V $25,000
Direct PB Marketing $25,000
Misc. 2011 Programs/Measures $10,000
Weatherization Measures $11,000 For ESP/RES
TDPUD Building Retrofit $20,000 From Enovity Report
Wire- $10,000
Total Energy Program Budget= $567,750
2012 WATER PROGRAMS:
Toilet Rebates $30,000 300 Toilets Rebated
Customer Leak Repair Rebate $10,000 100 Customer Leak Repairs
Toilet Exchange Program $30,000 150 Toilets Exchanged
Green Schools Program $7,500 11800 Conservation Kits/Kids
Smart Water Controllers $30,000 10 Customer Installations
Landscape Demo $3,000 Conservation Garden Updates
Misc. Measures $20,000 Low-Flow Showerheads/aerators...
Direct Program Marketing $12,500
Total Water Program Budget= $143,000
CFL(Compact Fluorescent Lightbulb), LED(Light Emitting Diode), ESP (Energy Savings Program),
RES (Residential Energy Savings Program), PB (Public Benefits Program), KwH (Kilowatt Hour)
EM&V(Evaluation, Measurement, &Verification), DEED(Demonstration of Energy-Efficiency Developments)
CIFEOM
rR .• 1• 0 0- -
•
Net Gross Net Net Net Lifecycle
Demand Net Peak Annual Annual Lifecycle GHG Utility Utility Mktg,
Program Sector •.
• Savings kW kWh kWh kWh Reductions Incentives EM&V,and Total Utility
y
(Used in CEC Units g Savings Savings Savings savings (Tons) Cost $ Admin Cost $ Cost($) -_
Report CategoryInstalled (kW) g 34 948 419,379 232 $22,400 $49959 $27,359
Appliances Res Clothes Washers 224 5 5 45,984
HVAC Res Cooling
8
Appliances Res Dishwashers 177
1 1 119385 99108 100,184 55 $179 700 $3,918 $21,61
Consumer Electronic Res Electronics
HVAC Res Heating
1 956 863 3,008,775 2,058,458 18,806,879 10,040 $185,326 $165,300 $3509 62
Lighting Res Lighting 46,733 ,
Pool Pump Res Pool Pump
Refrigeration Res Refrigeration 233 g 8 54,315 43,597 399,026 216 $23,780 $5,267 $29,047
HVAC Res Shell 34
1 1 1,349 19054 18,976 11 $59175 $1,186 $69 361
Water Heating Res Water Heating 61447 4 4 449962 34,687 3599920 193 $21,099 $14,569 $35,668
Comprehensive Res Comprehensive
Process Non-Res Cooking
HVAC Non-Res Cooling
HVAC Non-Res Heating
Res Lighting 4,0
46 216 216 1,011,801 870,068 7,607,262 4,216 $1479 796 $860 443 $234,239
Lighting Non
Process Non-Res Motors
4 4 13,455 10,764 53,819 29 $11,569 $6,827 $18,396
Process Non-Res Pumps 19800
99 201,684 1,613,476 851 $52,463 $499 360 $1019 823
Refrigeration Non-Res Refrigeration 15 18 18 212,2
HVAC Non-Res Shell
Process Non Res Process
Comprehensive Non Res Comprehensive
Other Other 910 16 16 175,420 135,926 11 445,560 781 $92,830 $49,869 $142,699
SubTotal 6 0 619 2 229 1,136 49579,745 39400,293 30,824,481 16,624 $580 9138 $387,698 $9679 836
rt
T&D IT&D r*
400 293 30 824,481 16,624 $580,138 $387,698 $967,836
Total 60,619 29229 11136 4,579,745 3, n
FEE Program Portfolio TRC Test 2•81 �
Excluding T&D r'
N